Posted on 08/20/2006 5:11:18 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
p>The Talk Shows
Sunday, August 20th, 2006
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., and Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y.; airport security consultant Rafi Ron; Rand Beers, former presidential counterterrorism adviser; Washington Nationals co-owner Mark Lerner.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.; British Home Secretary John Reid; Spike Lee, director of the documentary "When the Levees Broke."
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Sens. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Iraqi Industry Minister Fawzi al-Hariri.
That would be great!
InSane may be right on WOT and Abortion, but he has stabbed Conservatives in the back far too many times to expect our support. He is toast in the primaries w/o a key group, Republicans.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
Yeah, right. It's as if I said, "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush," and you said, "oh no! It harms the bird! And you might get hurt!"
Anyone reading my post had to see that I didn't really believe McCain was a loose cannon and no one can seriously make the case that he is. Yes, a bit unpredictable on some things.
Words have meaning. So do metaphor.
I agree 100 per cent
I'll bet you a dollar he's not toast and that he'll be on the 08 ticket.
I haven't seen McCain "stab" any conservative in the back. Disagree with some conservatives, perhaps, but he's always done exactly what he said he would do.
If McCain were only looking out for himself, he would not have taken the unpopular positions he has, especially on the WOT
The needing more troops, and doing this and that and arm chair quarterbacking the WOT etc. is all just more Mccainiac triangulation/BS IMHO. I don't believe a word that comes out of his or Hillary's mouth, haven't for some time.
Remember every time Mccain has said yes on an issue he has also said no, Just like Hillary! These people are just full of it and are not to be trusted.
The last I heard is that the Senate has still not sent the bill over to the House. The Senate must remove the revenue portion of the bill before it can be sent over so the ball is in the Senate's court, not the House.
I differ....Liebermann would not be as a Democrat,
hence it is one less in the Senate for Dems..a big
plus for Repubs to hold the majority..don't you thnk?
Also, I think Liebermann would change a few things by
siding more with Repubs...since he was trated like a
piece of..sh$$ by the Dumbocrats.... Jake
Yes you are correct only 2 above normal did not know Firefox did that but then I have only used it a couple of times and have to admit went back to what I am more familar with.
Sorry should read posts more carefully
#144, That is true,but today we have the DBM which is not too unlike the waaay Radical Left radio Talk Shows that are so filled with lunacy and lunatics that they cannot even get sponsors. They have to be propped up by stealing from money designated for local Charity Funds,and take big bucks from Lunatic fringe types like Moveon.orgies.
I'm sorry, but I have no problem with a guy who says "more troops" while backing the President 100%. And I can't think of a single issue where McCain has said "yes" and then "no." He's remarkably consistent.
That sounds a good feature because obvious with IE the only way to do that is change your screen resolution and then you loose quality.
Oh Please, he stabs us in the back every chance he gets. He may be on the ballot, but not as a Republican.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
McCain also believes in "global warming." I see "global warming" as a tool to get more and more control over people. That is what appeals to McCain. Remember, McCain also said he would put "clean government" over the First Amendment. There was nothing "clean" about CFR. McCain made sure that it favored him. He said the business about contributions from tribes would be fixed. It has not.
The frustration level is high. There are some things GW could do that he is not but many require a stronger voting block in congress. Once again I would not take his job for anything. I still see our best bets as being totally activist and supporting the best candidates we can whenever we can.
However, my concern about McCain goes beyond this complaint. I think he is emotionally unstable, and is unfit to be President because of that. In addition, I am dead certain the media is pushing him in order to set us up with a candidate in which they have ready-made attacks already written.
For this same reason I would not support him in the office of Secretary of Defense or Vice President.
However, if by some disaster he gets the nomination, I will support him because his cabinet nominees would be drawn from the Republicans' deep bench, instead of the leftists of the democrats. I would vote for him and pray that the people surrounding him kept him under control, and would install the VP if he got too nutso.
So the president of CNN admits that they are an outlet of the Democrat party?
Whitehouse-news-message, Weekly Review & other lists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.