Posted on 08/18/2006 9:31:38 PM PDT by Let's Roll
Subject: Fwd: Spanish newspaper article on Judaism (In English)
All European life died in Auschwitz
By Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez
I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly discovered a terrible truth - Europe died in Auschwitz. We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world.
The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world. These are the people we burned. And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.
They have turned our beautiful Spanish cities into a third world, drowning in filth and crime. Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts. And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition.
We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their talent for hoping for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs. What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.
All American Patriots must pay attention and come together or they will eventually lose their great country as well. Spain has gradually allowed their country to be absorbed by liberal polices, ideals and a permissiveness that presented the current dilemma.
Nice pinup of Ahmad-in-jihad. Red eyes a diabolical touch.
Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.
Those who chose not to convert were stripped of all their property and assets prior to expulsion. They were not allowed to take any more than they could carry with them.
The Romans and Egyptians, no. The Virginians, yes.
I believe it was the Arabs who came up with the concept of "zero", allowing the entire of mathematics to open up.
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/Zero.html
Well, here's another source:
"Several months after the fall of Granada an Edict of Expulsion was issued against the Jews of Spain by Ferdinand and Isabella (March 31, 1492). It ordered all Jews of whatever age to leave the kingdom by the last day of July (Tisha B'Av), but permitted them to remove their property provided it was not in gold, silver, or money."
I'm sick of it. Just sick of it. The fact that some historical event may have been bad, or even very bad, is in no wise a license to exaggerate without limit.
How about something simple, like the Arab introduction of the use of the "zero" to mathematics ?
I would say that made the world better ...
Well, what if it was in LAND, smart guy?
permitted them to remove their property provided it was not in gold, silver, or money
OK, couldn't take any LAND, for obvious reasons. Couldn't sell their land and take the money or its value in gold & silver.
So what kind of property, other than the clothes on their backs, were they allowed to take with them, Defender of the Faith?
I did not know that....thanks.
Very sobering.
Is this supposed to support your statement that Hitler studied Islam in the trenches during WWI ?
Hitler spent WWI fighting on the front in France.
The Armenian Genocide took place around what is now Turkey.
"Sorry, what I wrote was unclear...I did not mean Hitler studied islam as a religion, he studied the METHODS of annihilation practiced by the Turks. "
Nice little tapdance - just wondering which website you got the original "hitler studied Islam in the trences" from ?
You may wish to ponder the accuracy of other statements they make.
"Let's try this again."
Maybe you should take a deep breath and calm down instead.
"So what kind of property, other than the clothes on their backs, were they allowed to take with them"
Sounds as though they were allowed to take such things as horses, donkeys, mules, cattle, sheep, precious perfumes, fabrics, and jewelry.
"Defender of the Faith?"
I wish I could aspire to that title, but I will never approach deserving it.
Just trying to defend the truth here.
Sounds as though? Not one of the contemporary accounts of the refugees mentions leaving with large fortunes in livestock and gems. NOT ONE!
If they did take livestock with them, this would have been eaten while on the road.
"Not one of the contemporary accounts of the refugees mentions leaving with large fortunes in livestock and gems. NOT ONE!"
Man, you are really tendentious. Do you really have such a low opinion of those Jews as to think they would be stupid enough to be seen leaving with a "large fortune?"
That said, we're not arguing about "large fortunes." We're arguing about whether your statement that they were required to forfeit all property is correct or not, and have established that it isn't.
"If they did take livestock with them, this would have been eaten while on the road."
In 14th century Europe, livestock were as good as cash. Particularly good horses.
Strike out 'in the trenches' - due to faulty memory -all else can be sourced:
Adolf Hitler used what is now called the Armenian holocaust as his model for an even greater holocaust. Ottoman Turks developed techniques later used by the Nazis, such as piling 90 people into a train car with a capacity of 36, and leaving them locked in for days, terrified, starving, and often dead.
Hitler was even more impressed with how the Turks got away with genocide. When Hitler on Aug. 22, 1939, explained that his plans to invade Poland included the formation of death squads that would exterminate men, women, and children, he asked, "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?" ...
You wrote: "You may wish to ponder the accuracy of other statements they make."
Who are 'they'?
... the mathematical conception of zero ... was also present in the spiritual form from 17 000 years back in India.
What is certain is that by around 650AD the use of zero as a number came into Indian mathematics. The Indians also used a place-value system and zero was used to denote an empty place. In fact there is evidence of an empty place holder in positional numbers from as early as 200AD in India but some historians dismiss these as later forgeries. Let us examine this latter use first since it continues the development described above.
In around 500AD Aryabhata devised a number system which has no zero yet was a positional system. He used the word "kha" for position and it would be used later as the name for zero. There is evidence that a dot had been used in earlier Indian manuscripts to denote an empty place in positional notation. It is interesting that the same documents sometimes also used a dot to denote an unknown where we might use x. Later Indian mathematicians had names for zero in positional numbers yet had no symbol for it. The first record of the Indian use of zero which is dated and agreed by all to be genuine was written in 876.
from your link
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.