Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Help Republicans Win the Connecticut Senate Seat in 2006 [retread troll zotted]
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/ctsenate ^

Posted on 08/16/2006 12:45:00 PM PDT by Sashasasha

We ask all Republicans politicians to help the Connecticut Republican candidate win the senate seat up for election on November 7, 2008.

We ask you to do this by:

1. Convincing Republican nominee Alan Schlesinger, who has proven to be a weak candidate, to drop out of the race.

2. Replacing Alan Schlesinger with a strong Republican candidate.

3. Accepting the fact that Republicans, like popular Governor Jodi Rell, can win in Connecticut.

4. Stopping all verbal and financial support of Independent Democrat Joe Lieberman, who has pledged to caucus with the Democrats and continue to vote with them on most issues.

5. Endorse the Republican nominee, and work to get him or her elected.

If Republicans continue to surrender this seat to Lieberman, it sends a bad message to America: if liberal senators vote with us on one or two issues, we will let them be re-elected without a fight.

While Alan Schlesinger is legitimate Republican with a conservative record, his election has been mired in scandal. With polls showing his support below 10%, it is clear that he will not win the election. If Schlesinger were to drop out of the race, he could be replaced with a great Republican candidate.

The American Conservative Union gave Lieberman a 7% rating in 2003, a 0% rating in 2004 and an 8% in 2005. Lieberman has already promised to caucus with Democrats and maintain his liberal voting record. There is no reason for Republicans to aid his election in any way.

John Kerry only won this state by a 10% margin in 2004. With Lieberman and Lamont splitting the liberal vote, this is a great opportunity for Republicans to add a seat to their senate majority.

In the 2004 Connecticut Senate race, Republican Jack Orchulli took a third of the vote against popular Democratic incumbent Chris Dodd. Orchulli would easily be able to maintain those votes in 2006, already making him competitive in a three way race.

If the Republican party was united behind a strong candidate like Orchulli, he could win the seat, add to the Republican senate majority and carry out a respectable voting record for conservatives nationwide. The re-election of Joe Lieberman won't do any of that.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: connecticut; democratoperative; desperate; dncagent; dummie; dusleeper; electioncongress; koskiddie; lamont; lieberman; newbie; orchulli; retread; schlesinger; seminarposter; troll; zot; zotted
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 next last
To: GregH

Wrongo


81 posted on 08/16/2006 2:39:27 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

BTW, if State Senator John McKinney is half as despicable an excuse for a Republican and for a human being as his congresscritter father who died of AIDS, we don't need him either. Lieberman won't die of AIDS, whatever his drawbacks may be.


82 posted on 08/16/2006 2:40:06 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

great analysis ..not.


83 posted on 08/16/2006 2:40:32 PM PDT by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Just how does another Republican "step in"? Getting this nominee out might wind up like the Delay fiasco in Texas.


84 posted on 08/16/2006 2:40:49 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: GregH

What it would actually show is tactical sense.


85 posted on 08/16/2006 2:43:10 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: GregH
you dont see Dims even vouching for Chafee, Collins,Snowe etc anyone apart from a another dim.

If any Rat runs against Snowe or Collins or any other "enlightened" GOP moderate, the Dim candidate and the Dim machine will campaign against them just as hard as they would against a real conservative.

I don't support Schlesinger because he's scandal tainted and won't make it above 5%. But still, the GOP should stay out of this race and let the chips fall where they may fall. It's just like Alien vs Predator. Whoever wins, we lose.

86 posted on 08/16/2006 2:44:04 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (404 Page Error Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

how exactly is it tactical sense for Republicans to get Lieberman elected, how does it help to maintain the GOP majority in the senate, get Judges appointed, tax cuts etc if a ultra liberal is allowed to define himself as a centrist politically,


87 posted on 08/16/2006 2:45:39 PM PDT by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Sashasasha
There are races all over the country that need the resources more: Jim Talent; Conrad Burns; Mark Kennedy; Rick Santorum for four.

AND when Red Ned is defeated by Lieberman and Republicans re-elect Lieberman as they did over "Republican" Weicker in 1988; the Demonrats, moveon.org, the Deans, International ANSWER, and the other red slime will scream in pain as intense as that of banshees doused in Holy Water.

As Republicans unite behind Lieberman, Lamont and his red supporters will be destroyed without waste of resources.

88 posted on 08/16/2006 2:46:08 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GregH

Those confused about what to do here need lots of analysis.


89 posted on 08/16/2006 2:48:02 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Just how does another Republican "step in"?

I don't know. It may be too little too late for a good Republican to step up. But conservatives and Republicans should never support a liberal. I can understand if Joe would have denounced his own party and forcefully stood by Bush's side on the WOT instead of backing down right before the primary. Look, Lieberman even trashed the WOT and Rumsfeld when it was clear he was losing the moonbat vote. He's just another Dim politician trying to save his ass.

90 posted on 08/16/2006 2:48:16 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (404 Page Error Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
The intellectually challenged in the Senate may be talking about that, but the ones who want to keep the Dems as strong as possible will bring Joe back in the fold. Imagine if they shun Joe, even though he offers to caucus with them. They push him into being an independent, instead of voting with the GOP 10 percent of the time, it becomes more like 40 percent of the time, since Joe probably trends towards the GOP on social issues and business. Joe either doesn't vote for Harry for leader, or votes for the GOP.

The Dems won't want that. They will support Lamont half-heartedly, unless it appears that Lamont will win (which is unlikely). As the race heads to the finish, they will make nice, and a few may even campaign for ol' Joe.

From Joe's point of view, the voters in his state are pretty left wing. They are split between the moonbats and the socialists. Joe cannot win if he suddenly becomes a Republican. He HAS to tell the voters that he will stay a Dem, or else the Dems won't vote for him, because they sure don't want to send a Bush supporter to the Senate. So, even if he is pissed off at his own party, he has to say nice things about the Dems, and tell the voters that he will still be a Dem if elected. So, unless he wants to look like a liar, when he gets back to DC, he'll do exactly what he promised, which is caucus with the Dems. They'll put him on a committee, maybe not his first choice, but a decent one, and all will be forgotten in a year or two. After all, it's not like Joe left the party or anything, he's just not as far left as 52 percent of the Dems in Connecticut. He's still to the left of 60 or 65 percent of the dems nationwide.

91 posted on 08/16/2006 2:48:21 PM PDT by Defiant (Let the Muzzies travel on their own airlines so they don't endanger the rest of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The best thing for the GOP to do (failing to get a replacement candidacy) is to stay out of the race and let the rats tear it out, a case of one extreme ultra lib or ever another less extreme ultra lib slugging it out in CT..the GOP should not be wasting its effort.


92 posted on 08/16/2006 2:48:50 PM PDT by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Sashasasha

Do you ever get tired of being wrong?


Schlesinger should run very quietly and then drop out of the race near the end of October.

We want this Joe vs. Ned.

Either way we win.


93 posted on 08/16/2006 2:52:51 PM PDT by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
A vote for Schlesinger is a vote for Lamont!

Never thought I'd live to see the day that a Freeper in good standing told other Freepers to vote for the Dem candidate instead of the Republican in the race. It will be a cold day in hell before I vote for a Dem in any race where political philosophy has any bearing. Dogcatcher, maybe. School board on up, hell no.

94 posted on 08/16/2006 2:55:19 PM PDT by Defiant (Let the Muzzies travel on their own airlines so they don't endanger the rest of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: GregH
There is ONE overriding issue, the War on Terror. Joe will support the President on this which is the ONLY reason he was challenged. Hence a victory for Joe would be a victory for the President. It would also allow the GOP to truthfully portray the Party of Treason as unfit for leadership due to their blindness on National Security. It would also allow the GOP to truthfully portray the Party of Treason as bigoted, intolerant, anti-Semitic and just clueless in general.

Joe was the Party of Treason's VP candidate and now it turns on him like rabid dogs. This shows that the party is totally untrustworthy and hypocritical. It ran a candidate which it says NOW is a dog. It NOW has to admit that it was lying in 2000 or is lying NOW.

This is a disaster for the Party of Treason and a welcome opportunity for the GOP if handled properly. Either they support Lamont or Joe. If Lamont they are easily branded as the party of wild-eyed radicals. If Joe then they piss off the Ultra Left leaving it more disposed to vote Green.

BTW I do not want the GOP to officially endorse Joe or to run no candidate because that would hurt him more than help. Republicans need no instruction on what to do here so an official position is not needed.
95 posted on 08/16/2006 2:58:36 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

See #95.


96 posted on 08/16/2006 3:00:22 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
W I do not want the GOP to officially endorse Joe or to run no candidate

It will be interesting for the GOP to "let it ride" and see just what the voters of Connecticut do.

97 posted on 08/16/2006 3:07:15 PM PDT by airborne (Fecal matter is en route to fan! Contact is imminent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: rock58seg
Vote for lieberman = a vote for Democrat chaos and confusion.

A vote for Lieberman is a vote for a left wing democrat. I don't smoke crack because it's safer than heroin, and I don't vote for Lieberman because he's less loony than Lament. They're both still liberals, only a few degrees separated.

98 posted on 08/16/2006 3:16:40 PM PDT by Defiant (Let the Muzzies travel on their own airlines so they don't endanger the rest of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Lieberman wouldn't join the attempted filibuster against Alito. Lamont almost certainly would have. Lieberman has pointed out that we owe our president some respect in wartime, in the national interest. Lamont would not. That kind of thing matters.

I would add that there would be a slight upside to a Lieberman loss. The idea of a "moderate Democrat" would take another small hit, and it would become slightly more clear to a few more people that they simply belong in the GOP, not the Rat party. But the "moderate Dem" myth is very powerful, because the historic Democratic party has a powerful hold on many, many people's imaginations.

It's more helpful, I think, to show the handful of other non-crazy Democratic senators that they can be non-crazy and still survive a primary challenge and the opposition of their hard-left colleagues.

But look, if Joementum loses, he had it coming.


99 posted on 08/16/2006 3:51:03 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Sashasasha

I see you have a history here...


100 posted on 08/16/2006 4:22:31 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson