Skip to comments.
Ohio Democrat Ends Campaign after arrest (congressional candidate Stephanie Studebaker)
Townhall ^
| Wednesday, August 16, 2006
Posted on 08/16/2006 4:05:05 AM PDT by IrishMike
Democratic congressional candidate Stephanie Studebaker is removing her name from the ballot after being charged with domestic violence, according to a statement posted Tuesday evening on her campaign Web site.
Studebaker and her husband, Sam, were booked Sunday morning into the Montgomery County jail after police answered calls about a fight in their home. Each was charged with domestic violence and released on a $25,000 bond.
This photo provided by the Montgomery County, Ohio, sheriff's office shows Stephanie Studebaker. Studebaker, a Democratic congressional candidate, and her husband Sam Studebaker, were each charged with domestic violence after sheriff's deputies responded to the couple's home on the report of a fight, authorities said Monday, Aug. 14, 2006. They were both booked Sunday into the Montgomery County jail, police said. Each was released on a $25,000 bond. (AP Photo/Montgomery County sheriff's office) "After deciding to focus my efforts entirely on my family, I am withdrawing my name from the ballot as a candidate for Ohio's Third Congressional District, effective immediately," the statement on the Studebaker for Congress site read.
She suspended her campaign Monday evening against two-term incumbent Mike Turner, a Republican already considered the solid favorite. The seat, in southwest Ohio, includes Clinton and Highland counties, most of Montgomery County and about half of Warren County.
Studebaker, 45, a veterinarian and political activist, won her party's nomination in her first run for elective office. Dennis Lieberman, Montgomery County's Democratic Party chairman, said a special primary election would be held to replace her.
That likely will be Ohio's second special congressional primary next month. Six-term Republican incumbent Bob Ney officially withdrew from the 18th District race in southeast Ohio on Monday.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 2006; 2008; congress; congresselection; congresselections; ohio; senate; uglystick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
08/16/2006 4:05:07 AM PDT
by
IrishMike
To: IrishMike
They were only fighting for a Lark
2
posted on
08/16/2006 4:12:30 AM PDT
by
fredhead
(Women want me....Fish fear me....I can dream can't I?)
To: IrishMike
I don't know if she should be more embarrassed or her husband.
3
posted on
08/16/2006 4:14:33 AM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: IrishMike
"..and her husband Sam Studebaker, were each charged with domestic violence.."
'Domestic violence', 'distracted driving', charges are getting wondrfully vague niwadays.
4
posted on
08/16/2006 4:15:29 AM PDT
by
TalBlack
To: IrishMike
There has to have been more to this, Montgomery County is heavy Dem. The burbs may be GOP but the county went for the Dems in the last election.
5
posted on
08/16/2006 4:16:17 AM PDT
by
Recon Dad
(Marine Spec Ops Dad)
To: IrishMike
This wouldn't stop Hillary.
To: IrishMike
"Democratic congressional candidate Stephanie Studebaker is removing her name from the ballot."
Do Democrats get to remove their names fromn ballots while Republicans (Tom Delay) can't?
7
posted on
08/16/2006 4:18:45 AM PDT
by
preacher
(A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
To: IrishMike
She certainly has the typical criminal look of a dim candidate ...
8
posted on
08/16/2006 4:19:04 AM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
To: preacher
Do Democrats get to remove their names fromn ballots while Republicans (Tom Delay) can't?
.
.
.
That would seem the case.
Remember New Jersey when Bob (the torch) Torcelli was loosing badly in the polls, against state election laws, but condoned by the DRats on the NJ state courts, Torcelli was replaced by the retired cadaver.. Lautenberg.
9
posted on
08/16/2006 4:23:03 AM PDT
by
IrishMike
(Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
To: IrishMike
No wonder this country is going to hell in a hand basket..With people like this running for office and in office there is no more values left with this kind of trash..at least she left the race, something most democrats would not do..
10
posted on
08/16/2006 4:24:17 AM PDT
by
Beth528
To: tx_eggman
She looks exactly like a Meth head that wifey and I ran across yesterday...
11
posted on
08/16/2006 4:27:16 AM PDT
by
ErnBatavia
(Meep Meep)
To: tx_eggman
Obviously not her best picture...but even on her best day I would question her IQ........
12
posted on
08/16/2006 4:36:42 AM PDT
by
yoe
To: TalBlack
Distracted driving is a creative way to enhance the extortion abilities of fundraising for each town.
13
posted on
08/16/2006 4:37:17 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: IrishMike
Probably my libertarian streak coming out but:
- What is "domestic violence." What is the threshold between having a spat and domestic violence? Pretty vague charge.
- Wonder if the police had a warrant to come onto private property? Unless the couple were out on the front lawn brawling, what would be the probable cause? Can a wife not throw ashtrays at her husband in the privacy of their home anymore?
I bet there is more to this story. And, if the candidate were a Republican, we would all know it by now.
14
posted on
08/16/2006 4:38:05 AM PDT
by
IamConservative
(Humility is not thinking less of oneself; humility is thinking about oneself less.)
To: IamConservative
>What is "domestic violence." What is the threshold between having a spat and domestic violence? Pretty vague charge.
A. The admission that or
B. residual physical damage to another person within the domicile indicating that, a battery or aggravated battery has taken place.
>Wonder if the police had a warrant to come onto private property? Unless the couple were out on the front lawn brawling, what would be the probable cause? Can a wife not throw ashtrays at her husband in the privacy of their home anymore?
No Probable Cause problem here. No warrant needed to respond to a 911 call, call from a neighbor, sounds or sight of a battery taking place.
15
posted on
08/16/2006 4:49:04 AM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
To: MindBender26
Good point. I've known 2 men arrested for 'DV' for breaking their own possessions (throwing things against the wall/floor, not at the women, swearing and yelling in a fit of rage over a wife / girlfriend guilty of irresponsible behavior from detrimental fiscal irresponsibility (Ccards) and/or cheating, deceit, and lying.
The cops and the courts automatically determined there was no reason for the men to get mad and rulings followed such.
Nowadays with our PC courts, schools, gov folks, getting mad is not an option when another human being has blatantly done another wrong.
16
posted on
08/16/2006 5:26:48 AM PDT
by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: tx_eggman
Egads, she's rough looking. Were they fighting over the crack pipe?
17
posted on
08/16/2006 5:28:01 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: IamConservative
Can a wife not throw ashtrays at her husband in the privacy of their home anymore? Obviously so - since I don't remember the Capitol Police arresting Shillary for domestic violence.
Oh wait - she was throwing lamps, not ashtrays.
18
posted on
08/16/2006 5:31:43 AM PDT
by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: TalBlack
'Domestic violence', 'distracted driving', charges are getting wondrfully vague niwadays. And it seems strange to me that BOTH get charged with domestic violence for a fight INSIDE their own home.
Weird.
To: RSmithOpt
>Good point. I've known 2 men arrested for 'DV' for breaking their own possessions (throwing things against the wall/floor, not at the women, swearing and yelling in a fit of rage over a wife / girlfriend guilty of irresponsible behavior from detrimental fiscal irresponsibility (Ccards) and/or cheating, deceit, and lying.
The underlying purpose in cases such as this is to prevent harm. There are few situations in which LEOs can prevent a battery or even homicide, rather than just write reports after the crime occurs. This is one of those rare cases.
If either party is so out of control they are breaking their own valuables, it's a short jump to breaking the other person's valuables... or even breaking the other person.
The death penalty is not a legitimate punishment for too much charged on the family credit card. (On the other hand, ask me about this when the wife's AMEX bill comes in every month!)
20
posted on
08/16/2006 2:32:35 PM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson