To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
08/14/2006 10:25:02 PM PDT by
GoLightly
To: Marius3188
it will change our perception of Illinois history dramatically Let's keep Clam. If one Frog beat another there by two whole years makes no difference and certainly isn't dramatic news.
5 posted on
08/14/2006 10:39:40 PM PDT by
ASA Vet
(3.03)
To: Marius3188
[What's certain is that something's written in the stone. What's less certain is whether the markings have any historical significance.]
"Whosoever pulleth the sword from this stone...."
6 posted on
08/14/2006 10:45:46 PM PDT by
spinestein
(Follow The Brazen Rule)
To: GoLightly; blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; ...
7 posted on
08/14/2006 11:03:51 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Marius3188
The two-inch-thick slab of limestone a foot high and eight inches across captured Cook's attention because of the markings carved onto its surface, including:
* The letters "IHS" (a Greek abbreviation for Jesus) with a small cross extending up from the "H."
* A larger cross below the letters in a unique "reclining" position.
* The numerals "1671."
To: Marius3188
From what I understand, it has to be the real deal. The markings translate to "On this day in 1671, we surrender."
To: Marius3188
Who is to say he wasn't there in 1681, was feeling mischievous and carved 1671?
21 posted on
08/15/2006 3:16:15 AM PDT by
fso301
To: Marius3188
"it's going to kind of take the wind out of the stone's sails." Tortured metaphor alert!
23 posted on
08/15/2006 3:41:12 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
( “I'm the Emperor, and I want dumplings!” (German: Ich bin der Kaiser und will Knödel.))
To: Marius3188
LaSalle, Dictionary of Canadian biography. Discussion of his whereabouts in 1671 starts around paragraph 10 and goes on for about 10 or 12 paragraphs.
24 posted on
08/15/2006 3:49:51 AM PDT by
syriacus
(A vote 4 Lamont is a vote 4 the right of abusive men to kill women + children, here + abroad.)
To: Marius3188
Early efforts at fauxtology.
25 posted on
08/15/2006 4:21:37 AM PDT by
Raycpa
To: Marius3188
If the carving was done in 1675, it blows the old thing. Proving "about" 300 years old means nothing. And limestone?? pretty soft stuff.
31 posted on
08/15/2006 7:21:02 AM PDT by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Marius3188
50 posted on
06/27/2008 10:01:48 PM PDT by
CodeToad
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson