Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Embassy Warns Of Possible Terror Attacks In India
Associated Press ^ | August 11, 2006

Posted on 08/10/2006 10:57:20 PM PDT by HAL9000

NEW DELHI -- The U.S. Embassy in New Delhi warned Friday that foreign militants, possibly al-Qaida members, may be planning to carry out bombings in India's two major cities in the coming days.

In an e-mail sent to American citizens living in India, the embassy said New Delhi, the capital, and Bombay, the country's financial and entertainment hub, were the likely targets, and the attacks were believed to be planned for either before or on India's Independence Day, Aug. 15.

The embassy confirmed that it had sent the e-mail, although Indian officials refused to comment on the warning.



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedaindia; alqaida; bombay; globaljihad; india; mumbai; newdelhi; terrorism; terrorists; usembassy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 08/10/2006 10:57:21 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

As if this hasn't been going on for about sixty years since Pakistan and India were separated when England pulled out.

Further evidence for the urgent need of recolonization by the West.........


2 posted on 08/10/2006 11:00:08 PM PDT by 308MBR ( "She pulled up her petticoat, and I pulled out for Tulsa!" Abstinence training from Bob Wills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR

Didn't they have a few big ones a couple of weeks ago ?

Cool .. let's just capture or KILL the terrorists, and worry about the rest of things later...


3 posted on 08/10/2006 11:14:45 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
in India's two major cities...New Delhi, the capital, and Bombay, the country's financial and entertainment hub...

That journalist just ticked off some of the civic boosters in Calcutta...

4 posted on 08/10/2006 11:15:14 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR


What's more important is robin williams rehab. Let's have priorities here!


5 posted on 08/10/2006 11:16:47 PM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Westlander

....as well as what Mel Gibson says when he's a bit lit.


6 posted on 08/10/2006 11:18:52 PM PDT by 308MBR ( "She pulled up her petticoat, and I pulled out for Tulsa!" Abstinence training from Bob Wills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RS

Geeze dude. I like the way you think....and that tagline.

Nothing like a little common sense to clear the air.


7 posted on 08/10/2006 11:20:04 PM PDT by 308MBR ( "She pulled up her petticoat, and I pulled out for Tulsa!" Abstinence training from Bob Wills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR
"Recolonization"? LOL!
Colonization was the reason why Pakistan was created in the first place. Colonization was the reason why we have a permanent Kashmir problem. And as a further payback England is currently undergoing a "recolonization" carried out by Pakistan and B'desh. We already have plenty of British screw-ups to ask for more.
8 posted on 08/10/2006 11:29:35 PM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

I suppose the libs will blame this on Bush and Iraq


9 posted on 08/10/2006 11:34:47 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://discuss.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Gengis Khan
Colonization was the reason why Pakistan was created in the first place.
Colonization was the reason why we have a permanent Kashmir problem.

"At the start of the nineteenth century, most of present-day Pakistan was under independent rulers. Sindh was ruled by the Muslim Talpur mirs (chiefs) in three small states that were annexed by the British in 1843.

"In Punjab, the decline of the Mughal Empire allowed the rise of the Sikhs, first as a military force and later as a political administration in Lahore.

"The kingdom of Lahore was at its most powerful and expansive during the rule of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, when Sikh control was extended beyond Peshawar, and Kashmir was added to his dominions in 1819. After Ranjit Singh died in 1839, political conditions in Punjab deteriorated, and the British fought two wars with the Sikhs.

"The second of these wars, in 1849, saw the annexation of Punjab, including the present-day North-West Frontier Province, to the company's territories. Kashmir was transferred by sale in the Treaty of Amritsar in 1850 to the Dogra Dynasty, which ruled the area under British paramountcy until 1947.

"...In Punjab, annexed in 1849, a group of extraordinarily able British officers, serving first the company and then the British crown, governed the area. They avoided the administrative mistakes made earlier in Bengal.

A number of reforms were introduced, although local customs were generally respected. Irrigation projects later in the century helped Punjab become the granary of northern India.

"The respect gained by the new administration could be gauged by the fact that within ten years Punjabi troops were fighting for the British elsewhere in India to subdue the uprising of 1857-58 (see the British Raj , this ch.).

"Punjab was to become the major recruiting area for the British Indian Army, recruiting both Sikhs and Muslims. "

==============

Source:http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+pk0017)

===============================

===============================

A VERY brief history of modern Kashmir

"Following the independence from British rule in 1947 and the partition of India and Pakistan, individual princely states in the subcontinent were given the choice of joining either of the two countries.

"The strategic value of Kashmir meant it was important for both countries to have it join their side.

"In 1948, the Maharaja signed accesion to India, much to the dismay of Pakistan. Pakistan feels that since the majority of the Kashmiri population is Muslim, Kashmir should belong to them.

"India maintains that since the ruler of Kashmir took the decision like other princely states did there should not be any question on the issue. Moreover India argues that since it is not strictly sectioned on the basis of one religion like Pakistan is, and since there are more Muslims in India than in Pakistan, it should not matter if the majority of Kashmiris are Muslims.

This issue has remained a bone of contention between the two countries ever since."

11 posted on 08/11/2006 12:48:00 AM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: InstantKarma51
Empire? Is already an old joke.

Today's UK is competing with B'desh to provide cheap labour for the terrorist industry.
13 posted on 08/11/2006 1:10:01 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Thanks but I already know that part of history.


14 posted on 08/11/2006 1:10:55 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: InstantKarma51

These intelligence alerts are the norm every year for 15 Aug and 26 Jan. Bit of hype at present.


16 posted on 08/11/2006 1:38:23 AM PDT by Cage Rattler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR

>>Further evidence for the urgent need of recolonization by the West.<<

No.


17 posted on 08/11/2006 2:33:25 AM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

So, what are you saying? That you have a PHD in South Asian affairs? From where? The University of Timbuktu?

The "Disputed" territory is not the coloured part of India that the map you posted labels as "disputed". Its the Gilgit area in your map. Another war and Pakistan can forget about Kashmir. It will lose Sindh to India and Balochistan will become an Indian ally bordering Iran. Pakistan might as well re-christen itself as Muslim Punjab and NWFP, kinda like Serbia and Montenegro...ooops wait, they separated too...maybe it will be more likely "the Dictatorshit of Muslim Punjab" and the "Chaotic Islamic wasteland in the middle of nowhere".


18 posted on 08/11/2006 2:55:29 AM PDT by MimirsWell (Pakistaneo delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Pakistan feels that since the majority of the Kashmiri population is Muslim, Kashmir should belong to them.

Canada feels that since the majority of the Alaskan population was Inuit, Alaska should belong to them.

Root causes again. I've always wondered why we have so many Eskimo suicide bombers.

19 posted on 08/11/2006 3:30:00 AM PDT by dinasour (Pajamahadeen and member of the Head SnowFlake Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MimirsWell

"That you have a PHD in South Asian affairs? From where? The University of Timbuktu?"

Or maybe John Kerry School of Foreign Affairs?


20 posted on 08/11/2006 5:40:22 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson