Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TSA.gov - Threat Level Change for the Aviation Sector
tsa.gov ^ | August 10, 2006 | Transportation Security Administration

Posted on 08/10/2006 3:37:00 AM PDT by HAL9000

Threat Level Change for the Aviation Sector

The U.S. threat level is raised to Severe, or Red, for all commercial flights flying from the United Kingdom to the U.S.

The U.S. threat level is raised to High, or Orange for all commercial aviation operating in the U.S., including international flights. Flights from the U.S. to the U.K. are also Orange.

All travelers on commercial U.S. carriers and on all flights into the U.S., please be advised of the following changes to airport screening procedures:

NO LIQUIDS OR GELS OF ANY KIND WILL BE PERMITTED IN CARRY ON BAGGAGE. ITEMS MUST BE IN CHECKED BAGGAGE. This includes all beverages, shampoo, sun tan lotion, creams, tooth paste, hair gel, and other items of similar consistency.
Exception: Baby formula and medicines must be presented for inspection at the checkpoint.

Beverages purchased in the boarding area (beyond the checkpoint) must be consumed before boarding because they will not be permitted on board the aircraft.

Passengers traveling from the U.K. to the U.S. will be subject to a more extensive screening process.

These measures will be constantly evaluated and updated when circumstances warrant.

How every passenger can assist in security:

TSA Contact Center Phone 866-289-9673 or E-mail tsa-contactcenter@dhs.gov



TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 911fifthanniversary; aviation; extended; fifthanniversary; homelandsecurity; londonairlineplot; orangealert; security; terrorism; transportation; tsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: driftdiver
The terrorists are trying to change their attack profile but there is one common denominator in 99% of the attacks and it aint Grandma or two year olds.

Right. So we should not screen them at all, right?

41 posted on 08/10/2006 4:37:01 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
IEDs can be made out of a lot of everyday-looking, common, ordinary stuff that would be hard to detect, if the different components were divided up into different bags and then assembled later on the plane.

Thank you for "getting it".

The wacky liberals do not believe the threat is real and that this was made up to overshadow Lamont's win.

The wacky conservatives think we should just intern every Muslim and do nothing else.

Both groups should not be ignored.

42 posted on 08/10/2006 4:40:06 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Yep, that's the incident...thanks.


43 posted on 08/10/2006 4:40:17 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"They just say "medicines" that would include such as Pepto Bismol, Maalox etc."

Yes, I believe you're correct. A passenger would probably lose their Pepto Bismol, if they're unwilling or don't have the time to put it in their checked baggage, but the TSA won't take a legitimate prescription for say insulin away that a passenger might need in an 'in flight' emergency.

44 posted on 08/10/2006 4:43:07 AM PDT by 4Freedom (America is no longer the 'Land of Opportunity'. It's the 'Land of Illegal Alien Opportunists'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom

We're gonna have some wacko lib screaming because she had to taste her own breast milk.

In my mind, taste it or pitch it. It isn't like she is not carrying two working breasts.

I'd taste my own snot if everyone else had to, in order to have my kids safe on a flight. And actually, I would hate it but I wouldn't whine to the press.


45 posted on 08/10/2006 4:45:07 AM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Aren't the Chechnyians pretty caucasian looking?

That has always been my fear since Breslin.


46 posted on 08/10/2006 4:47:54 AM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Great -- I have to fly cross-country tomorrow.

Might as well go to the airport now so I can make my 10 am flight tomorrow.


47 posted on 08/10/2006 4:48:36 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Creation "science" has a final answer--adherence to the scriptures. All other data are discarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
No, the focus is ELDERLY......which you claim we are wasting our time on screening.

How many elderly terrorists hijacked those planes on 9/11?

Take your time.

I would like to know if you could visually identify an elderly Muslim from an elderly Christian if they are dressed the same? Or are you one of those guys who can spot criminals without a second thought?

The majority of Muslims are from Middle Eastern countries, and they are of Middle Eastern descent. Now try not to get too traumatized when I suggest that there may be a 'slight' difference in palor? (and no, that isn't the only factor)

Now kindly explain how a terrorist is going to "easily" slip bomb components into Aunt Ida's purse?

How much time do you spend at airports? Do you watch people?

I spend more time at airports than you may think. And yes I do watch people.

What of it?

Watch the elderly....many are in a stupor from medication or whatever.......it would be child's play to put an object into their bag, and let them carry it onboard.

Sounds like YOU are the one who is in a stupor. Are you really that dumb? You are doing the same thing (and unjustifiably I might add) to senior citizens that you accuse me and others of doing to Muslims. Now get a clue Sparky, there were NO senior citizen terrorists in the 9/11 attacks, not ALL senior citizens walk around in a medicated stupor (in fact there are plenty of people of ALL ages that do that, and I suspect you might be one of 'em!), and you need to re-think what you're talking about here.

A large percentage of flights now carry the disabled. Have you seen the wheelchairs in airports? How tough would it be to get something into their bags when they cannot turn around or look under their seat?

Why of course, the disabled are so pathetic that you can light a match on their forehead for the fuze on your bomb and they'll never notice.

Your initial charge is that grandma is not going to be threat because TSA is wasting its time screening them. I purport that you are ignorant of the threats out there. Al Qaeda is not the only terrorist group. There are many, many others that would like to make a name for themselves by pulling off a big event that have nothing to do with Muslims.

Name a few.

Better yet, tell us which one of these alternate terrorist groups are as big a threat as al Qaeda?

As I said...you are myopic.

You has met the enemy, and he is you.
48 posted on 08/10/2006 4:50:52 AM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
There must come a point where political correctness will have to be jettisoned for the sake of good sense, the general welfare of our citizens, and stopping the hemorrhaging of resources.
The inconvenience and expense to millions of travelers can't be justified to satisfy the needs of a handful of muslim non-citizens.

Banning all foreign muslims from all flights to the US would be an excellent start with flights for US non citizen muslims allowed only once --- out.

Even the cost of "tolerance" has a limit. Currently it must be billions$ yearly in time lost, inconvenience and frustrations. It's just a matter of time that things will change, specially when there is little or no evidence of the existence of the "good" muslim. Talk is cheap. Positive action non-existent.

49 posted on 08/10/2006 5:01:34 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Related thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1680953/posts
'Plot to blow up planes' foiled [UK TERROR THREAT LEVEL RAISED TO IMMINENT{U.S.raised terror level)


50 posted on 08/10/2006 5:02:19 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
You say rancor... I say self-defense mechanism.
Senseless pandering to killer cultures is not a virtue.

If TSA and the rules that drive them is part of the problem...

51 posted on 08/10/2006 5:07:25 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Now get a clue Sparky, there were NO senior citizen terrorists in the 9/11 attacks...

And because of that, we should not screen them.

Keep fighting yesterday's war. You will assure our loss.

The majority of Muslims are from Middle Eastern countries, and they are of Middle Eastern descent. Now try not to get too traumatized when I suggest that there may be a 'slight' difference in palor?

Yeah, like the Chechnyans? Also, you never heard of black muslims or caucasian traitors like John Walker Lindh?

You are doing the same thing (and unjustifiably I might add) to senior citizens that you accuse me and others of doing to Muslims.

I don't give a crap about political correctness. I never said you were a racist. I only suggested that your belief that screening the elderly is a waste of time is ignorant of the threat.

Better yet, tell us which one of these alternate terrorist groups are as big a threat as al Qaeda?

Sendero Luminoso, Black Panthers, FARC, Tamil Tigers, etc. The sad fact is that Sept 11th has made many of these groups jealous because they have been around a lot longer and have wanted to hit the US.

Now, many of these groups want to upstage Al Qaeda. The last thing we need is competition among terrorist groups!

But in your "wisdom" we would never screen caucasians or children or women or the elderly.....only young Muslim males.

Brilliant.

52 posted on 08/10/2006 5:10:36 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Cooperate with TSA personnel at checkpoints and at all gate

Bring your own vaseline.

53 posted on 08/10/2006 5:13:29 AM PDT by dingoMcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Let's just agree to disagree. Give it a rest.
This is no time for sermonizing by the clueless.

The rules will change; it's simply a matter of when. Going through PC motions is simply frustrating.

54 posted on 08/10/2006 5:17:10 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
"Thank you for "getting it"."

There are a lot of folks that wish we could go back way things were before 9/11. Unfortunately, that won't ever happen.

There are just too many nut jobs out there with a crazy cause that they're willing to kill innocent people for.

Muslim jihadists may be at the top of that list, but there are many others and these days everybody with a lap top has most of the makings of an IED. All you need to add is the explosive charge.

That wouldn't be so bad, if laptops were the only device that could be used. Add cellphones, PSPs, PDAs, walkmen, mp3 players, portable DVD players, camcorders, cameras, GPS units and a ton of other electronic gadgets that EVERYBODY, including me, carries onto the plane with them.

I was in line behind a moron that tried to carry a couple dozen 12 gauge shotgun shells onto the plane with him, so I know first hand that TSA can catch that, but what if someone put a couple ounces of gunpowder into some other innocent looking container?

I don't like standing in line any more than the next guy, but I sure don't want to go crashing into a skyscraper, either.

I'm for cutting TSA a little slack. Let them use their fancy explosive detection machines all they want, if it will prevent terrorists from killing us on purpose or just the plain stupid from killing any of us by accident.

55 posted on 08/10/2006 5:22:37 AM PDT by 4Freedom (America is no longer the 'Land of Opportunity'. It's the 'Land of Illegal Alien Opportunists'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

LOL!


56 posted on 08/10/2006 5:23:44 AM PDT by 4Freedom (America is no longer the 'Land of Opportunity'. It's the 'Land of Illegal Alien Opportunists'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Let's cut to the chase here.

There ARE other terrorist groups out there, just like there are all sorts of venomous snakes throughout the world.

However: America is currently at war with one specific species of venomous snakes, the snakes that answer to the name 'al Qaeda'. And the adherents of that death cult are all believers and followers of the "religion of peace".

For that reason, we should be reserving our highest scrutiny for those who fit that profile, and that means Muslims. I will be the first to agree that not all Muslims are al Qaeda terrorists, but all al Qaeda terrorists have turned out to be Muslims, that is the ugly fact of life.

Sure there are other terrorist groups. But the one that is engaging in world wide jihad happens to be al Qaeda and their kin, like Hezbullocks, Hamas, etc., just to name a couple.

I never said that Grandma should get an automatic pass on to the plane without any screening. What I am saying is that it is statistically unlikely that a terrorist threat is going to be manifested that way, your concern about bombs and other tools of terrorists being smuggled into the purses and bags of unsuspecting passengers is admirable, however you are making an assumption that any terrorist is going to run the risk of losing control over the very weapons he intends to use in carrying out his mission.

That, I contend, is rather unlikely. Above all else, terrorists want to keep control over as many details (and weapons) as possible.

IOW, strip searching Granny is not going to do a damn thing to stop terrorism.

It might give some senior citizen TSA screener a large charge, but it won't enhance our security.

Everyone should be screened, period. But the highest level of scrutiny should be reserved for the most likely suspects.


57 posted on 08/10/2006 5:30:47 AM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

FWIW, I heard this morning that the men weren't actually seated on the plane, but that seating was close, which would tell me that the attack was imminent.

Of course, there's no telling how correct early reports are.


58 posted on 08/10/2006 5:31:05 AM PDT by Xenalyte (who is having the best day ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Aren't the Chechnyians pretty caucasian looking? That has always been my fear since Breslin.

This is a straw man.
At the very least a US passport database check, and the entry of all foreign passports and photos of foreign nationals flying in our airlines would be a good start.
I would scrutenize even US passport holders if they have the sandmaggot accent. There are US citizens, and fraudulent US citizens.

PC will be the death of us.

59 posted on 08/10/2006 5:41:09 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I'll speculate that the plot was intended to be carried out on Sept. 11th - for obvious reasons

My guess is sooner than that, or we wouldn't have this massive disruption of airline traffic today. We know first reports are usually misleading, but I get the feeling, based on mention that the plot was known for awhile, that perhaps the Brits thought 9/11 was the target, but some development proved that a wrong assumption.

OTOH, if this was a lucky catch by British intel, it would explain pushing the panic button today, since the plan's details would be sketchy.

60 posted on 08/10/2006 6:05:08 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson