Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton calls for Rumsfeld's resignation
The Citizen ^ | August 4, 2006 | AP staff

Posted on 08/04/2006 11:29:31 AM PDT by yoe

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton called Thursday for the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, hours after excoriating him at a public hearing over what she said was a “failed policy” in Iraq.

“I just don't understand why we can't get new leadership that would give us a fighting chance to turn the situation around before it's too late,” the New York Democrat told the Associated Press.

“I think the president should choose to accept Secretary Rumsfeld's resignation.”

Clinton confronted Rumsfeld directly on Iraq and Afghanistan earlier in the day, and said his answers left her convinced he should go.

“The secretary has lost credibility with the Congress and with the people. It's time for him to step down and be replaced by someone who can develop an effective strategy and communicate it effectively to the American people and to the world.”

For months, Clinton has resisted joining the chorus of other Democrats demanding Rumsfeld's ouster. Her remarks Thursday were the harshest assessment yet from the woman considered her party's early front-runner for the 2008 presidential nomination.

The former first lady has come under attack from some in her own party for her 2002 vote for the war and her current opposition to a deadline for U.S. troop withdrawal.

“I am frankly tired of hearing the same stories from the administration's national security team,” Clinton told the AP. “The president changed his economic team, he changed his White House team - I think it's time for him to change his security and defense team.”

Clinton said her own view of the war has not changed.

“What's been clear is that despite my being a constant and persistent critic of how the president has conducted the war, it has not achieved the goals that he has set,” she said.

Earlier in the day, the senator wasted no time going after Rumsfeld when he testified in a morning hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“Under your leadership there have been numerous errors in judgment that have led us to where we are,” the New York Democrat said at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing. “We have a full-fledged insurgency and full-blown sectarian conflict in Iraq.”

The defense secretary seemed briefly stunned by the intensity of her attack, exclaiming, “My goodness,” before launching into a point-by-point defense.

He rejected some of her specific criticisms as simply wrong and said the war against terror will be a drawn-out process.

“Are there setbacks? Yes,” said Rumsfeld. “Is this problem going to get solved in the near term? I think it's going to take some time.”

The testy exchange between Clinton and Rumsfeld came after a top general told the panel violence in Iraq is probably as bad as he's ever seen it and the country may be descending into civil war.

“We hear a lot of happy talk and rosy scenarios, but because of the administration's strategic blunders - and frankly the record of incompetence in executing - you are presiding over a failed policy,” she said. “Given your track record, Secretary Rumsfeld, why should we believe your assurances now?”

Rumsfeld vehemently denied he'd ever glossed over the difficulties of the fighting in Iraq or elsewhere.

“There's a track record here,” countered Clinton. “This is not 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, when you appeared before this committee and made many comments and presented many assurances that have frankly proven to be unfulfilled.”

“Senator, I don't think that's true,” Rumsfeld fired back. “I have never painted a rosy picture. I've been very measured in my words and you'd have a dickens of a time trying to find instances where I've been excessively optimistic. I understand this is tough stuff.”

At that point, the Republican chairman of the committee, Sen. John Warner of Virginia, came to Rumsfeld's defense, saying his past comments had been balanced.

Clinton still shied away from a demand made by a growing number of Democrats: a deadline for withdrawing troops from Iraq.

The disagreement between the two extended to Afghanistan. The senator specifically faulted Rumsfeld for saying in 2002 that the Taliban was gone, noting that the extremist faction has grown stronger in recent months.

He conceded violence has escalated in Afghanistan, but added, “Does that represent failed policy? I don't know. I would say not.”

The defense secretary said he expected the violence there to follow a seasonal pattern and decline as winter approaches.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; broomstick; congress; grandstanding; hillary; klintons; nomorewirehangers; rumsfeld; sillydems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: henbane
LOL!!

I think we'll get a chance to end her presidential ambitions in a couple of years.

61 posted on 08/04/2006 12:45:11 PM PDT by AdvisorB (For a terrorist bodycount in hamistan, let the smoke clear then count the ears and divide by 2.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Hiliary, the Junior Senator, from New York called for Sec. of Defense Rumsfeld's resignation...LOL.

"I think the president should choose to accept Secretary Rumsfeld's resignation."
---
As if Rumsfeld is going to listen to her. Since when does President Bush follow directives from Hillary?


62 posted on 08/04/2006 12:47:07 PM PDT by Goldie Lurks (professional moonbat catcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

I can't believe Rumsfeld was dumb enough to go before that committee. Completely dumb...


63 posted on 08/04/2006 12:53:15 PM PDT by nikos1121 (Thank you again Jimmy Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Would women take pride in a woman who seemed to know about multiple women who were having relationships and sex with her husband for decades? Do they want a victim President? Is allowing numerous women to be boinking her husband considered the kind of leadership skills we want to have in any President?

Would anyone love how she handled trying to get government employees falsely jailed in the travel office fiasco?

Would they want to hire Hillary for President if they were aware of how her husband gave the Chinese the ability to fix their rockets and also gave them new guidance systems so they for the first time reach and nuke any city in the USA?

Can the people really handle hearing her speak for any length of time without wishing they had cotton in their ears?

Was anyone really fans of Hillary's attempt to destroy a seventh of the US economy in trying to create socialized medicine through the government to ruin the best medical care in the world?

I don't know... those dopes in New York elected her. Your litany is just a small sample too - what about Vince Foster?
- The FBI files at the White House?
- The missing Rose Law Firm records that suddenly turned up at the White House.
- Her husband's wholesale pardons his last month in office, one of which benefited a small precinct in New York which voted for here by over 90%.
- The pettiness of actually stealing furniture and other items from the White House and taking them to Chappaqua?
- Her brother Hugh's representation of plaintiffs who were also recipients of a presidential pardon

The list of her complicity in corruption and criminality is long and deep. She shouldn't have the political credibility of a skunk, yet the MSM fawns over her.

64 posted on 08/04/2006 12:55:07 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
I keep oysters. Does that count?

No it does not.


65 posted on 08/04/2006 1:11:21 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
My point is that we have two years to get the public more educated.

I hope people like Ann Coulter comes out with a book on Hillary and her husband and how dangerous for the country that would be.
Not only would she make mega-bucks with that book, but she would slam the woman back to hell in all interviews.
66 posted on 08/04/2006 1:12:57 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

LOL! Good fnid.


67 posted on 08/04/2006 1:13:19 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

"The proletariat will unite and throw off our chains...just as soon as Farmer Ivan milks us."


68 posted on 08/04/2006 1:42:31 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (NewsMax gives aid and comfort to the enemy-- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1642052/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Well now. The great man has spoken!



Oh. Oh dear. Nevermind.
69 posted on 08/04/2006 3:52:27 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

That foreign sounding congressman would say it so much better. "You dare to call yourself a Secretary of Defense? You're a pitiful spent manipulative, pompous old man! Why don't do the honorable thing for once in your life and shoot yourself in the head repeatedly with a worn-our BB gun! I'm waiting for your answer, but I don't think you have the courage to answer me, you snivveling evil, uncouth grandstander! I yield the balance of the remaining 2.25 seconds of my time to my honorable colleage from Massa"--BUZZZ!


70 posted on 08/04/2006 4:03:05 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne; ASA Vet

Of course. :-)


71 posted on 08/04/2006 7:07:55 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

LOL


72 posted on 08/04/2006 7:08:11 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: yoe
She thinks that her saying this, helps her with the DUers and the KOSsacks. It probably won't, in the long-run.
73 posted on 08/04/2006 7:09:50 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe; SJackson; yonif; Simcha7; American in Israel; Slings and Arrows; judicial meanz; ...
I saw some of the questioning on cable. Clinton was in true form—Democrat form that is. After one of her outrageous accusations, Rumsfeld just said, Oh, my...."

She is the perfect example of why, if the Democrats make any gains whatsoever in the next election cycle, the violence plaguing the rest of the world will find its way once again to America's shores.





AMERICA AT WAR
At Salem the Soldier's Homepage ~
Honored member of FReeper Leapfrog's "Enemy of Islam" list.
Islam, a Religion of Peace®? Some links...  by backhoe
Translated Pre-War IRAQ Documents  by jveritas
Mohammed, The Mad Poet Quoted....  by PsyOp
One FReeper On The Line  by SNOWFLAKE
The Clash of Ideologies - A Review

"It's time we recognized the nature of the conflict. It's total war and we are all involved. Nobody on our side is exempted because of age, gender, or handicap. The Islamofacists have stolen childhood from the world." [FReeper Retief]

American Flag

74 posted on 08/04/2006 7:41:29 PM PDT by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Hillary got on the Armed Services Committee for one reason and I quote:

"I want to know what I'm talking about".

Kinda says it all: She should have added: "I don't know sh** about the military and frankly I could care less, but this is about running for President and since I would be Commander in Chief, I have to make it look good".

Going after Rummy makes me look like I know something and ya know....people are so stupid, they'll believe me. Notice that I never told Rummy any alternatives just that he's "stupid".

75 posted on 08/07/2006 3:26:40 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Mrs. Bill Clinton:

- Former First Lady of Arkansas
- Former First Lady of United States, 1993-2001
- Currently in first term as U.S. Senator (D-NY)


IMHO, there actually is one reason, not well understood by many, that she claims the power granted her, and that is that she was the architect of Richard Nixon's fall...which gave us Jimmuh Carter......


76 posted on 08/07/2006 3:43:47 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: avacado
Then he said "In responding to your prepared statement..."

I thought Rummy easily dispatched the over matched junior senator from NY. The media didn't give his responses much play, I think most of it went over their heads.

Or maybe, as Rummy had stated the day before, these public hearings are used by some senators for political posturing.

Naturally, the media reports the home-teams minor points no matter how badly they lost the overall game.

77 posted on 08/07/2006 4:20:38 AM PDT by oldbrowser (Good news is no news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
Rummy went there for one reason....to show us what Hillary is up to and expose her as a "rehearsed" plotter/planner for the Dem nomination.

He's soooo good and showed us so well!! She accomplished NOTHING!!

78 posted on 08/07/2006 5:15:08 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson