[Aussie Dasher]

Good stuff!!!!

[A CA Guy]

Did they go so far as to play any Yoko Ono music?

[dawn53]

There was a TV series a few years ago, and one of the characters used to routinely hack into the government TV and broadcast the "truth." Can't remember the name of the series, but I always thought that would be a good psychological weapon.

[ASA Vet]

Here's yesterdays thread

[no-to-illegals]

can one imagine the head of hassan nasrallah on a swine, as the swine run to and fro squealing. LOL

[StolarStorm]

Odd message to send the Lebanese. Why would they care how many people have been killed? What should have been shown was the video about the rockets being fired near the controversial destroyed building.

[BunnySlippers]

Seriously????

[elcid1970]

Ha, hah!!!!!!!

Go Israel, you wonderful people!!

:^)

[taxesareforever]

Great job Israel!!!

[FreeRep]

Good post.
All the great things are simple, and many can be expressed in a single word or image.

[Enterprise]

Hey pig boy, you've been hacked and pw3nd!

[SkyPilot]

Make Your Time

[pointsal]

what a charming bit of programming

[JohnCliftn]

Developing idea...

Israel has few fair forums to present its case. Right?

1. Anti-Israel Venues: World Court, UN, European News-media, US Main-Stream-Media, etc. have proven hostile and prejudiced against Israel. Some of America's better newspapers have fairly presented Israel's case, but alas their circulation is still too small.

2. Possibly Fair Venue: It occurs to me that one place Israel could present its case is the US Supreme Court. There are precedents for this from the 19th Century, notably a border dispute among Chile, Peru and Bolivia.

3. Constitutional? It is Constitutional because (A) the US Constitution, Article III, gives the Supreme Court "Original Jurisdiction" in Treaty cases, and (B) there are enough Treaties involved so that someone can find some Treaty clause pin the legal action on.

4. Fair? It is Fair because, although some Supreme Court Justices have bizarre interpretations and opinions, all the Justices were excellent at guiding "Findings Of Facts" back in the days when each Justice presided over a Court with Original Jurisdiction in ordinary matters. This ability impose Rules of Evidence is all what is needed here.

5. Historical Model? It would work like the "Truth Commission" that Archbishop Tutu chaired in South Africa right after the fall of Apartheid. The SA "Truth Commission" use demonstrable facts to expose Apartheid for all to see for all time -- Apartheid was bad for Whites as well as Blacks. Similarly, the Israel Case would use facts that are demonstrated with all the Rigor of our Rules of Evidence.

[river rat]

I wonder what odds Las Vegas is offering on this man living to see the next Ramadan?

It begins September 24, 2006.
Nasrallah's life will hopefully end before that....

Semper Fi

[Rome2000]

Maybe the GOP can use these tactics in November against our domestic enemies in the press and democratic party.

[gotribe]

Can someone hack Katie Couric? Would be a riot. Go Israel!

[Thunder90]

show the dead Hezbullah fighters with pigs crawling over them..

[LachlanMinnesota]

It is good to show the Lebanese that the Hezzies can be eliminated so that they have hope for a future without the Hezzies molesting them from behind...