Posted on 07/27/2006 1:39:40 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
Ann Coulter just on Cavuto being interviewed.
She wanted to "remind the viewers" that the normal election cycle is for the party in the White House to lose seats. She expects this election to be one where Republicans lose seats. She added "a lot of seats" before Neil moved on to another question.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I believe Rush was quoting a Dem on that "prediction".
bttt
First, she is wrong we will most likely gain seats. Second she must be getting her election info from the same people who helped her write her anti science diatribe.
I hope the MSM runs with this and similar stories. Novak is saying he has a source who claims a loss of 30 seats. Get this message out. Make the dims feel so confident of a win, that many won't show up to the polls.
Or maybe it was a spineless Repub he was quoting. Sometimes its hard to tell the difference.
Bob Novack, not a an accurate source...
Maybe she consulted the same source that told her Clinton was a latent homosexual.
Word to you GOP mainstreamers: you pushed for GWB in 2000.
How's that "conservative" (GOP's election label for him) been working out?
Sow to the wind, reap the whirlwind.
He said that in the debates when he was up for re-election. My solice at the time was I knew the house led by Delay wouldn't send it to him. If both houses go to the dems all bets all off.
The GOP would have to lose 31 seats for the Dems to get a majority. I don't know if a disaster of that proportions is possible. If it is, this country is headed for serious trouble.
Everyone says Republicans will lose 30 seats because they abandoned their conservaive base.... Is that to imply that "we" will vote for democrates as an alternative or be so dumb as to not vote at all?
So what is she doing to help reverse the trend? Nothing that I can see.
Bush was still a better choice than Kerry.
Also, I believe local elections are about taxes, guns and local issues.
No way do the Dems offer a better alternative.
I see no real changes.
I don't support big spenders.
Maybe then the President can use a veto and spending will be controlled.
The solution was never really replace the Democrats with Republicans.
Anyone who stays in DC long enough will be corrupted by the power and money there. The solution is term limits.
Well she did spend 3 chapters in her latest book trying to prove that a belief in science makes one a God hating liberal.
That didn't exactly help the conservative cause.
Bye bye pombo
What is SHE doing? I didn't know she had a seat to save.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.