Skip to comments.
US rushing 'smart bombs' to Israel
Jerusalem Post ^
| 7/22/6
| NATHAN GUTTMAN
Posted on 07/22/2006 3:15:28 PM PDT by SmithL
The US is rushing a delivery of "smart bombs" to Israel after Israel indicated it needed the bombs for its military campaign against the Hizbullah.
The New York Times reported Saturday that the decision to rush the shipment was reached after little debate within the administration.
The "smart bombs" - bombs which are equipped with precision guidance devises, are part of an arms deal reached months ago between Israel and the US, but the fighting in Lebanon led Israel to ask for an expedited delivery of the bombs, before the agreed scheduled of supply.
According to the report, the US is stressing that the early shipment should not be seen as an emergency supply to help Israel, but rather as a change of schedule in a deal which was previously agreed upon.
An American - Islamic group - Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) called on the Bush administration to stop the deal, saying that the rush delivery at a time of war would be "unconscionable."
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; allyisrael; bombs; hezbullies; smartbombs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: Jameison
The ordered shipment was reported few months ago [in connection with the Iranians] as not very large - 500 bombs, IIRC. So there was lead time, production run wouldn't be too large, and as for designer brains - they have these to spare.
21
posted on
07/22/2006 3:30:56 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: RushingWater
Should this be public? Looks like the New York Times is our enemy once again. I guess we should be grateful they didn't publish the times and dates of the delivery. Phocking Times are determined to get us all killed.
22
posted on
07/22/2006 3:31:32 PM PDT
by
strange1
("Show the enemy harm so he shall not advance" Sun Tzu The Art of War)
To: SmithL
The smart bombs will spare innocent Lebanese lives. I say ship 'em fast. ;^)
Israel bombed the roads to Syria and the airports in an effort to stop the Iran/Syria supply chain. Israel has every right to rearm, just as I am sure Hezbollah is desperately trying to do. Wars are hell, to the victors go the spoils. Hezbollah was doomed from the start. Too bad. They should have thought this through before kidnapping and attacking Israel.
23
posted on
07/22/2006 3:32:57 PM PDT
by
tioga
To: SmithL
They don't need smart bombs...Cluster bombs and daisy cutters will do every thing they need to do...And maybe a little napalm for the hard to reach places...
24
posted on
07/22/2006 3:33:27 PM PDT
by
Iscool
To: SmithL
"Where would you like them delivered?"
25
posted on
07/22/2006 3:37:11 PM PDT
by
jwh_Denver
(Arabs, the ultimate dysfunctional robots.)
To: SmithL
An American - Islamic group - Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)
26
posted on
07/22/2006 3:37:17 PM PDT
by
eyespysomething
(How do I set a laser printer to stun?)
To: Iscool; All
27
posted on
07/22/2006 3:38:09 PM PDT
by
musicman
To: Truthsearcher
Unless, of course CAIR *wants* more innocent Arab civilians killed so they can help their PR campaign against Israel. Nah, that couldn't be.Nah...that can't be it..yer way off base :)
28
posted on
07/22/2006 3:39:15 PM PDT
by
evad
To: SmithL
the rush delivery at a time of war would be "unconscionable." So if it was not a time of war it would be ok?
Or maybe a regular delivery would be fine?
How about if we use fed ex?
29
posted on
07/22/2006 3:40:08 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(A propensity to hope and joy is real riches; one to fear and sorrow, real poverty)
To: jwh_Denver
Load the C-5s, one right after the other. How about a few Stealth bombers for good measure. In fact, I would love to write a personal message on one of those bunker busters.
To: SmithL
An American - Islamic group - Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) called on the Bush administration to stop the deal, saying that the rush delivery at a time of war would be "unconscionable." Why, CAIR making it more difficult for Israel to efend itself? Unthinkable!
To: SmithL
32
posted on
07/22/2006 3:54:52 PM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: GSlob
Think GBU-28 bunker buster.
33
posted on
07/22/2006 4:46:53 PM PDT
by
Log
To: SmithL
The New York Times reported Saturday that the decision to rush the shipment was reached after little debate within the administration.
When is the New York Times going to "get it" and shut the hell up...unless disinformation has been fed to them, someone somewhere with the authority to do so needs to help them "get it."
They are acting like snotty high school journalism students encoding articles with secret messages about the principal...the stakes are too high with what the NY Times is printing.
34
posted on
07/22/2006 4:57:09 PM PDT
by
hummingbird
(Bloggers killed the Media Stars.)
To: zook
Another leak of sensitive info.
Likely CIA.
Entire Fed Govt needs a security purge.
35
posted on
07/22/2006 6:15:11 PM PDT
by
OldArmy52
(China & India: Doing jobs Americans don't want to do (manuf., engineering, accounting, etc))
To: SmithL
An American - Islamic group - Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) called on the Bush administration to stop the deal, saying that the rush delivery at a time of war would be "unconscionable."Every once in awhile, I read something like this and cannot think of an adjective adequate to its incredible stupidity.
36
posted on
07/22/2006 6:16:51 PM PDT
by
Irish Rose
(Will work for chocolate.)
To: SmithL
Hey Dubya, let's giterdone already! Give em what ever they need before they need it.
37
posted on
07/22/2006 6:42:52 PM PDT
by
NickFlooding
(Canceling out liberal votes since 1972.)
To: SmithL
I watched some footage of the ordnance the Israelis were dropping and I clearly saw a lance on one bomb......Daisycutter!!
Give'em Hell, Israel.
38
posted on
07/22/2006 6:45:58 PM PDT
by
stboz
To: SmithL
Cool.
Whatever they need.
39
posted on
07/22/2006 7:19:30 PM PDT
by
Soul Seeker
(Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
To: SmithL
"Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) called on the Bush administration to stop the deal, saying that the rush delivery at a time of war would be "unconscionable."" A ringing endorsement from CAIR! Great stuff! For our good friend Israel, it's time for some good customer discounts and some "two for one" blue light specials. No limit!
40
posted on
07/22/2006 7:19:50 PM PDT
by
GBA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson