Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EU to Iran: Israel will not hesitate to attack it's ally, Syria
Ma'ariv / GAMLA ^ | July 18, 2006 | Z Lando

Posted on 07/17/2006 10:42:18 PM PDT by Challenge

EU to Iran: Israel will not hesitate to attack it's ally, Syria

GAMLA INTELLIGENCE NEWSLETTER

The Arab daily that comes out in London, "Al-Sharq Al Awsat" reports this morning that European diplomats in Iran have warned the Iranians that Israel will not hesitate to attack it's ally, Syria.

According to this report, these warnings are behind the decision to send the Iranian Foreign Minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, to Damascus, yesterday for "talks".

The newspaper also reports that these Europeans, coined "friends of Iran", warned Iran that Israel has decided to destroy the Hizbullah infrastructure in Lebanon and hunt down and kill it's leaders.

The Europeans told the Iranians that Israel is ready to enter a "fateful" confrontation with Syria, which just in the last weeks has upgraded it's alliance with Iran. Under these agreements, Iran must send troops and weapons to support Syria in event of Israeli attacks against it.

Iran, who sees itself as the Mid East power, would suffer greatly, if Syria was to get hit hard by Israel, without it entering the fray. It seems that the Iran is blinking, but this could be an illusion.

The newspaper also quotes an Iranian source in the foreign ministers group that many leaders in Lebanon are treating Iran "more coldly" in the last days.

This full report and more will appear in the GAMLA newsletter to be sent out later today!

Click here to sign up for the FREE GAMLA Intelligence Newsletter!



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; iran; israel; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 07/17/2006 10:42:19 PM PDT by Challenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Challenge
After picking Romano Prodi, italy seems to have gotten even more liberal, staunchly against israel in its conflict with the Palestinians and Lebanon.

Sort of how after Zapatero was voted in, the Spaniards seem to have turned more liberal.

Odd that Europeans seem to alter with their leaders. Most Americans have the same views they had before George W. Bush was picked.

2 posted on 07/17/2006 10:46:12 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Challenge

Damascus is dust anyway in the long run. It may be the Iranians who destroy it with a big bang...If the IDF takes Syria on.


3 posted on 07/17/2006 10:47:16 PM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Challenge

Very glad to see this. This afternoon the MSM seemed to be trying to undo Israel's resolve by throwing doubt every time Israel spoke with clarity and determination. If Israel has decided to take on Syria, then the middle east bullies may be embarrassed because they didn't think anyone would allow Israel to make that choice.


4 posted on 07/17/2006 10:47:54 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Challenge

We should help.


5 posted on 07/17/2006 10:48:36 PM PDT by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet
The Europeans told the Iranians that Israel is ready to enter a "fateful" confrontation with Syria, which just in the last weeks has upgraded it's alliance with Iran. Under these agreements, Iran must send troops and weapons to support Syria in event of Israeli attacks against it.

They have already done this so what the hell does it matter.

6 posted on 07/17/2006 10:52:46 PM PDT by cpdiii (Socialism is popular with the ruling class. It gives legitimacy to tyranny and despotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lancer_N3502A
We should help.

We are. Iran knows if they attack Israel that will give us just the excuse we need to hit the iranian nuke facilities.

7 posted on 07/17/2006 10:52:59 PM PDT by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon
We are. Iran knows if they attack Israel that will give us just the excuse we need to hit the iranian nuke facilities.

Exactly.

Even more than that, though. Iran would be targeted for regime change. AmanAnAsshole would realize that his 12th Imam wouldn't even save him.
8 posted on 07/17/2006 10:57:06 PM PDT by lmr (You can have my Tactical Nuclear Weapons when you pry them from my cold dead fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon

We could have the rare opportunity of dealing with two birds with one stone. God is good!


9 posted on 07/17/2006 10:57:39 PM PDT by mathurine (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Good point. The article mentions that Iran has recently entered a defense agreement with Syria. I suspect Iran has recently guaranteed things to Syria that may become a chain around Iran's neck.


10 posted on 07/17/2006 10:59:28 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon
Bush is using Israel to kick Iran in this situation, nothing more.

The US has it's own agenda. It just so happens it's also in Israels interest.

11 posted on 07/17/2006 10:59:32 PM PDT by zarf (Italian Kid: My father can beat up your father! Jewish Kid: Big deal, so can my mother!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon
The fact that they exist is all the reason we need, we're just waiting for the right time.

We should Stealth bomb Syria's SAM sites just to give the IAF the upper hand.
12 posted on 07/17/2006 11:00:30 PM PDT by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

I'm sure every plane arriving from Iran right now at the Damascus airport is loaded with weapons to be smuggled into Lebannon and for Syria.

The Bakka valley is a notorious weapons smuggling route.


13 posted on 07/17/2006 11:02:59 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lancer_N3502A

The IDF took care of the Syrian SAM sites in 1982 and they can do it again. I'm sure the russians are selling them outdated worthless crap as they usually do.


14 posted on 07/17/2006 11:05:40 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

I'm sure you're right about that.


15 posted on 07/17/2006 11:06:45 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

Probably right, but it'd give our boys something to do...8-D


16 posted on 07/17/2006 11:12:08 PM PDT by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

I'd say it would be logistically impossible for Iran to provide significant assistance to Syria in either manpower or material. They have no means of delivering the aid overland across Iraq or Turkey, or by sea either. They would be interdicted and destroyed with exceptional efficiency.


17 posted on 07/17/2006 11:18:49 PM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

There should be NO planes from Iran landing in Damascus.

Israel ought to put a stop to that right now. An ultimatum follwed by a few shoot-downs ought to work wonders.


18 posted on 07/17/2006 11:21:20 PM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Challenge
Syria is NOT the problem, Tehran is.

It is WAY PAST time to take the fight into Tehran.

What good is a B-2 if we are too chickens*** to use it?

19 posted on 07/17/2006 11:40:27 PM PDT by rebel_yell2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Challenge
According to this report, these warnings are behind the decision to send the Iranian Foreign Minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, to Damascus, yesterday for "talks".

LOL. The proverbial "talks" like when a wife says, "Honey, I think we need to talk."

D'oh!

20 posted on 07/17/2006 11:44:03 PM PDT by rake (Okinawa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson