Posted on 07/16/2006 7:03:22 PM PDT by neverdem
Several new studies suggest that diabetes increases the risk of Alzheimers disease, adding to a store of evidence that links the disorders. The studies involve only Type 2 diabetes, the most common type, which is usually related to obesity.
The connection raises an ominous prospect: that increases in diabetes, a major concern in the United States and worldwide, may worsen the rising toll from Alzheimers. The findings also add dementia to the cloud of threats that already hang over people with diabetes, including heart disease, strokes, kidney failure, blindness and amputations.
But some of the studies also hint that measures to prevent or control diabetes may lower the dementia risk, and that certain diabetes drugs should be tested to find out whether they can help Alzheimers patients, even those without diabetes. Current treatments for Alzheimers can provide only a modest improvement in symptoms and cannot stop the progression of the disease.
The new findings were presented today at a six-day conference in Madrid by the Alzheimers Association and attended by 5,000 researchers from around the world.
Alzheimers affects one in 10 people over 65, and nearly half over 85. About 4.5 million Americans have it, and taking care of them costs $100 billion a year, according to the association. The number of patients is expected to grow, possibly reaching 11.3 million to 16 million by 2050, according to the Alzheimers Association.
But those projections do not even include a possible increase from diabetes.
Alzheimers is going to swamp the health-care system, said Dr. John C. Morris, a neurology professor at Washington University in St. Louis, and an advisor to the Alzheimers Association.
In the past decade, several large studies found that, compared to healthy people of the same age and sex, those with Type 2 diabetes were twice as likely...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Unless they find some way to burn that glucose real quick it gets stuffed into their fat cells or into nasty old triglycerides.
If and when I get it down into the 70s (which is still "normal") I can smell a Crispy Cream 10 miles upwind in a 2 inch per hour downpour.
And, lo and behold, vigorous use of your brain/mind complex tends to mitigate the effects of Alzheimers, even if you've got it ~ (I think we have the thread on that research somewhere within the last two weeks).
I was going along with your thesis until I noticed you used the word "too" in front of high blood sugar.
Surely, if you have such a high degree of intelligence, you would not have made such a simple error.
I'll take your advice with a grain of salt, and worry not about my kidneys.
Think of a flat rock.
Enjoy your life filled with spreadsheets and monitoring, immerse yourself in the glycemic index.
I'd encourage you to savor a meal, and don't drive. Why?
It's proven that driving can lead to death, as does walking down stairs, boating, swimming, parachuting, hang gliding, breathing, swallowing, eating pretzels, lighting fireworks, et al.
Your life must be tremendously boring. I hope you live a long, boring life.
Which is the brain equivalent of physical exercise with respect to Type II diabetes. There have been a few studies now that show that heavier brain utilization mitigates/prevents Alzheimer's. Insulin, like oxygen, is not particularly good for us though necessary and a lot of age related damage is caused by it. Idle insulin is the devil's workshop, so keeping the levels low and the hormone occupied prevents a lot of biological mischief. Insulin related damage increasingly becomes the leading cause of cardiovascular disease after 60.
I'm pretty sure I would have heard or read something in the meanwhile. Update Date: 2/9/2005 for the previous link.
Here's what they write at http://familydoctor.org/327.xml
"Testing (also called "screening") is usually done with a fasting blood test. You'll be tested in the morning, so you shouldn't eat anything after dinner the night before. A normal blood sugar test result is below 110 mg per dL. A test result higher than 125 mg per dL suggests diabetes. However, you should have 2 tests that are higher than 125 mg per dL, on 2 different days, before a diagnosis of diabetes is made. Test results from 110 mg per dL to 125 mg per dL suggest that you have a higher risk of diabetes." Reviewed/Updated: 12/05
It's a minor argument on what the cutoff is, over 100 or over 110 for "prediabetes" also known as impaired glucose tolerance. Over 125 fasting blood glucose on 2 different days is still required for the diagnosis of diabetes, unless you can show me a more recent and authoritative link.
If and when I get it down into the 70s (which is still "normal") I can smell a Crispy Cream 10 miles upwind in a 2 inch per hour downpour.
If your in a hospital and your blood glucose is less that 70, but you're asymptomatic, expect a serving of orange juice with 2 packs of sugar.
I sympathize. I'm also Type II and my A1C started out at 7.1. By taking Avandamet (Avandia and Metformin aka Glucophage) and exercising for an hour a day every other day (mostly walking), I lowered mine to 5.7 - 6.0. When my doctor told me the new level was 6.0, not 7.0, I basically said it was BS. If it was truly SCIENCE, why did they drop it from one round number to another round number? Can't they say that 6.8 was the new benchmark or 6.4? No. They jump from 7.0 to 6.0. In short, NIH or CDC or whomever makes these guidelines is full of sh!t.
The problem is that your doctor is always going to want to "play it safe" because they are paranoid of malpractice suits. Therefore, they are bullied into the national guidelines whether they agree with them or not.
Personally, I feel my best when my glucose is around 120. The "experts" claim that's too high. They want it at 90-110. When I get below 100, I feel weak and tired.
Keep in mind that any sugar measurement is a snapshot and not the be-all-end-all your doctors treat it like. The important thing is to watch what foods give you a sugar spike and learn to do without them. Exercise often. See if your medicine may work better by taking 1/2 doses every 12 hours rather than one dose every 24 hours. Check into other types of medication (there's a new one that gives you a 30-day "shot" with some +/- side effects). Bottom line, read everything you can get your hands on so you can take control of your health rather than letting your doctor control it. If you're in the 6's, you don't have that much modification to do but find what works and then stick with it.
Good luck. (Sorry to hijack the thread)
Sounds like symptomatic hypoglycemia to me. I would stop the new pill. Bring one of the new pills to the office next week. You can take it there and she can check your blood glucose if she doesn't believe you. This may take a few hours before it takes effect. You may want to bring a book, run some errands in the meantime, etc. It should take about the same amount of time as it took on the day you described earlier. Then she can document the effect. Docs are often very sceptical of a patient's history. The notion of patient non-compliance is always in the back of their heads.
What have you heard about this?
When I was sticking to Atkins, I would keep my carb target under 20 per day. It easily goes over that even when you are trying to avoid it. I'm very aware of a low blood sugar condition. I would experience hypoglycemic rebounds from a can of real Mountain Dew when I was in my 20's. It still happens today if I foolishly consume high glycemic index carbs. It causes a shaking, nervous feeling that makes it difficult to write with a pencil. A normal low just causes a tired, depressed feeling.
Thanks for the info.. When I was told I was a type2 I was pissed.. I love pasta bread and potatoes but over time like a month I tried to conform,,, and brought it down to 6.9.. I count carbs never eat real sugar but need to exercize more
Thanks stay in touch.. Kay
BTW how many carbs do you eat a day??
Science and Ethics at Crucial Crossroads
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
Thanks for the post & source.
Does type 2 diabetes also come from consuming a lot of sugar?
Watch it with Mercola, I think he may be a bit of a quack. I have read some of his research papers and I don't think any of them are peer reviewed. If you know differently I'd like to hear what you think.
P.S. Mercola isn't even an M.D., he's an Osteopath.
It's a very complicated subject. Suffice to say, genetic predisposition, lack of exercise and excess calorie consumption equals bad news. The links in comments 16 and 26 might shed some light.
When Osteopaths have unrestricted licenses to practice medicine and surgery, when the federal government provides three and four year scholarships for completing their degrees, what is your problem with any D.O.?
For your comment and references to other posts about type 2 diabetes, much appreciated.
My husband is an Osteopath.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.