Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No scientific basis for 'born gay' theory. (DUH!)
The Salt Lake Tribune ^ | 07/08/2006 | David Clarke Pruden

Posted on 07/12/2006 2:07:22 PM PDT by carlo3b

No scientific basis for 'born gay' theory
By David Clarke Pruden

Although the simple "born gay" theory has faded from the science scene, activists continue to misrepresent scientific findings. When you assert that individuals are born gay and cannot change, people naturally jump to the conclusion that same-sex marriage is the only rational choice for same-sex attracted individuals.

   However, the innate-immutable theory of homosexuality has no basis in science. The simplistic biological theory has been dismissed by all of the researchers whose studies have been cited to support the notion that homosexuality is so deeply compelled by biology that it cannot change.

   Let's examine the words of just one of those often incorrectly cited as providing evidence for a "gay gene." Simon LeVay notes, "It is important to stress what I didn't find. I did not prove that homosexuality was genetic, or find a cause for being gay. I didn't show that gay men were born that way, the most common mistake people make in interpreting my work."

   A new research study by a University of Illinois team, which has screened the entire human genome, reported that there is no one gay gene. Writing in the journal Human Genetics, lead researcher Dr. Brian Mustanski noted that environmental factors were also likely to be involved.

   Of the innate-immutable argument, Dr. Richard C. Friedman and Dr. Jennifer Downey, noted, "At clinical conferences one often hears . . . that homosexual orientation is fixed and unmodifiable. Neither assertion is true . . . The assertion that homosexuality is genetic is so reductionistic that it must be dismissed out of hand as a general principle of psychology."

   And the fluidity of homosexual attractions is well-established. Dr. Ellen Schecter of the Fielding Institute studied women who had self-identified as lesbian for more than 10 years and who after age 30 were now in intimate relationships with men lasting a year or longer.

   Even more prominent was the research by Robert Spitzer, the very psychiatrist who led the charge to remove homosexuality from the psychiatric manual. His study of 200 gay men and lesbian women who had undergone re-orientation therapy concluded: 44 percent of the women and 66 percent of the men had arrived at what he called "good heterosexual functioning" and 89 percent of the men and 95 percent of the women reported that they were bothered slightly or not at all by unwanted homosexual feelings.

   Mainstream gay-affirming publications like The Advocate are changing their terminology to embrace the concept of fluid sexual attractions. Matt Foreman, of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, summarizes what the gay movement has done.

   "We as a movement can take pride that we opened the door for young people to be much more fluid about sexuality, gender, gender roles, orientation and sexual behavior than any other generation in history. That's what the gay movement has contributed to society, and that's a tremendously good thing."

   But is it? If the innate-immutable theory of homosexuality has no basis in science then why do so many activists still insist that individuals are born gay and cannot change? LeVay provided the answer. He notes " . . . people who think that gays and lesbians are born that way are more likely to support gay rights."

   This is not to say that anyone chooses homosexual attractions nor do most of us choose many of the other challenges we face in life, but we do choose how we respond.
   ---
   David Clarke Pruden is the executive director of Evergreen International, a nonprofit Latter-Day Saint organization that provides resources and educational services for same-sex attracted members.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: borngay; gay; gaygene; gaymarriage; gramsci; homosexual; homosexualagenda; interiordecorating; lesbianism; liberalismgonenuts; liberals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last
BORN TO CHOOSE
1 posted on 07/12/2006 2:07:29 PM PDT by carlo3b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
Well I guess this is finally put to rest.. (eyes rolling) :)
2 posted on 07/12/2006 2:09:27 PM PDT by carlo3b ("Leave the gun, take the cannolis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

While I agree that there isn't a gay gene. I wonder what causes people to be sexually attracted to the same sex? My brother in law tells me that he's never had any feelings of sexual attraction to women but has to men since he was in middle school. I'm sure more psychological study of this phenomena will reveal more as time goes on.


3 posted on 07/12/2006 2:10:37 PM PDT by Mazda3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

I know people who were born gay, as in Helen Keller would know they are gay. Maybe science can't prove this but I believe some people are just born gay.


4 posted on 07/12/2006 2:16:23 PM PDT by jackieaxe (Democrats are mired in a culture of screwing English speaking, taxpaying, law abiding citizens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mazda3Fan

Agreed. There clearly isn't a gay gene -- if there were, evolution would have weeded it out -- but to call homosexuality a choice is to miss the point as well. It's certainly a pervision, and I believe it's wrong. But that doesn't mean someone woke up one day and decided to be attracted to men. Something happened in their lives to cause them to be confused about their sexual identity. We won't make any headway by telling gays simply to choose differently; we have to adjust the cultural circumstances that make such confusion commonplace.


5 posted on 07/12/2006 2:16:28 PM PDT by BackInBlack ("The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

I can't think of one good reason why one man would choose to wake up in the morning with his arms wrapped around another man. (all dumb jokes aside)


6 posted on 07/12/2006 2:16:35 PM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

That sure is a DUH ALERT!

Could someone send this to Bush and other gay sympathizers? Oh yeah, Bush is against "gay marriage" but loves to hire them to do jobs NORMAL people are groveling around to do.


7 posted on 07/12/2006 2:17:20 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackieaxe

Absolutely no proof of this. Twin studies actually show that there is no Gay gene.


8 posted on 07/12/2006 2:17:29 PM PDT by nikos1121 (Thank you again Jimmy Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jackieaxe

"Maybe science can't prove this but I believe some people are just born gay."

That statement alone proves it to be untrue.


9 posted on 07/12/2006 2:18:15 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

God allows all sorts of mysteries and challenges to unfold before our eyes. Its how we deal with those mysteries and challenges that is what He is looking at. Gay Pride, somehow, doesn't strike me as the correct response to the challenge of misorientated sexual preference.


10 posted on 07/12/2006 2:18:40 PM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mazda3Fan
I'm sure more psychological study of this phenomena will reveal more as time goes on.

Except that it's been removed as a class of "mental illness" so it is no longer being studied except on a genetic level.

11 posted on 07/12/2006 2:21:39 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

Yes, we are all born the same and then during life we choose what we want to be. White-black, conservative-liberal, male-female, gay-straight.


12 posted on 07/12/2006 2:22:19 PM PDT by abercrombie_guy_38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mazda3Fan
I have for as long as I could remember, been attracted to sky diving.. My better judgment intercedes whenever I ponder too long on the consequences. I seldom allowed myself to obsess with the thought that it might be a great idea to jump out of too many planes..

We were all born with the ability to think and choose, my parents and adult support groups always furnished me with enough information to make sound judgments about dangerous behaviors.. The gay lifestyle is generally far more dangerous than parachuting..

Parents never let your child ponder on this subject without your sound warning against homosexuality..

13 posted on 07/12/2006 2:23:15 PM PDT by carlo3b ("Leave the gun, take the cannolis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mazda3Fan

More psychological study won't help.The Psychologists have already decided that they don't want to hurt the feelings of gay people by labeling them as anything worse than a 'variation on normal'. I believe that men are born gay but I believe that it is a personality disorder. I also think that some men have a woman induced trauma (bad break-up or divorce, etc.)and decide that another man might not hurt them as easily. Pure speculation. I'm not in the field of Psychology.


14 posted on 07/12/2006 2:23:24 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

As a born-again, heterosexual married to the same woman for 37 years next month, I have a question.

Having been active in church for many years, I have found myself in situations where I have had to counsel homosexual men. What do you say when they sit there, with tears rolling down their cheeks and say: "I can remember being attracted to boys since I was 5 years old." Or, when they say: "I did not choose to be this way. Give me a pill to make me straight and I'll take it."

Having always been taught that no one is born homosexual, I've never really known how to "adequately" respond to those types of statements.

Anybody got a clue?


15 posted on 07/12/2006 2:25:03 PM PDT by no dems (www.4condi.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abercrombie_guy_38
Yes, we are all born the same and then during life we choose what we want to be. White-black, conservative-liberal, male-female, gay-straight.

Wow. Propaganda really works for you. Bought it all. You lumped in genetics with a choice and a "not likely" quite nicely.

16 posted on 07/12/2006 2:25:57 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

I do know about the twin studies. And you're right. When one identical twin is gay, less than half the time will the second identical twin be gay.


17 posted on 07/12/2006 2:26:37 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

I find it hard to believe that anyone would choose to be gay. Why would anyone choose a lifestyle which is clearly outside of the mainstream and clearly unnatural, if not for being born that way? I don't understand it but some people have different urges.


18 posted on 07/12/2006 2:27:20 PM PDT by jackieaxe (Democrats are mired in a culture of screwing English speaking, taxpaying, law abiding citizens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nmh

" Oh yeah, Bush is against "gay marriage" but loves to hire them to do jobs NORMAL people are groveling around to do"

I was going to suggest Bush hires based on ability rather than who people have sex with. But the Harriet Meyers (sp?) nomination clearly blew that theme.


19 posted on 07/12/2006 2:31:52 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: abercrombie_guy_38
When I was a kid, everyone of any notoriety was a smoker.. Avoiding cigarette smoking was harder to avoid than any bad behavior I was confronted with, but I did.. I thought it was a real sick behavior..

Pondering on my next door neighbor's son wasn't in my basket, but if it had been, I would have thought it was a sick behavior, and would have avoided the thoughts.. Get it!

20 posted on 07/12/2006 2:33:25 PM PDT by carlo3b ("Leave the gun, take the cannolis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson