Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Novak: My role in Plame leak probe (LEAKER = JOE WILSON ???)
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | July 12, 2006 | ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

Posted on 07/12/2006 3:55:19 AM PDT by Chi-townChief

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: Red Badger
1. The "Primary Source" is a Whitehouse official.

No, the primary source is an Administration official. This means he works in some executive branch agency such as the CIA but not in the White House.

61 posted on 07/12/2006 6:12:14 AM PDT by Jeff F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: angkor
seems Fitz knew the primary source....I wonder how ?

...the special prosecutor informed Hamilton that he would be bringing to the Swidler Berlin offices only two waivers. One was by my principal source in the Valerie Wilson column...
62 posted on 07/12/2006 6:12:40 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: hershey
Novak's career is hardly failing. He is a journalist and reporter with a distinguished track record. Nothing can take that away from him.

His career was in danger of failing at C(X)NN as viewers continue to leave in droves. He wisely switched to FOX and thus maintained his reputation and popularity.

Novak is the wise Elder Statesman of journalism.
63 posted on 07/12/2006 6:13:10 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BadAndy

Precisely! And coupled with the statement that the leaker called Novak later to explain his mistaken exposure of Ms. Plame, this still allows for Wilson to be the primary source.

Novak: "Another double Manhattan, Joe? Say, How were you chosen by the CIA for the Niger investigation?"

Wilson: "Thanks for drink, Bob. Well, I had some inside encouragment, my wife works there."

Inadvertant and phrased to be inoccuous. Only problem is that Novak was a good reporter and headed to known resources to find a real name. Good reporters don't just print "his wife" or "Mrs. Joe Wilson".


64 posted on 07/12/2006 6:16:25 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Scatology is serendipitous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
That's DC pundit talk that simply means the person is not a paid political "advisor" like Rove or Carville in the Klintoon era. IOW, the person is a Staff member, like Press Secretary, Chief of Staff, et al.....

That won't matter to the MSM/DNC/DU because to them EVERYTHING and EVERYONE is political. If it came from the White House, it's "Bush's fault". Don't try and trick them with facts.

65 posted on 07/12/2006 6:17:43 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: kempster
I don't know what book Wilson wrote but the chances are he didn't make a "fortune." To make anything over advances a book must sell extremely well. Even best-sellers seldom make big money for an author unless they go into soft back, sell overseas etc.

It's even doubtful if Wilson even wrote a book. Probably had a ghost writer.

The shame of it is that creeps like Mr. & Mrs. Joe Wilson are on the government's payroll.
66 posted on 07/12/2006 6:19:14 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff F
Aren't the two terms synonymous? Administration Official could mean the Deputy Assistant Under Secretary of Paper Clip Counting.........
67 posted on 07/12/2006 6:23:08 AM PDT by Red Badger (Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

"seems Fitz knew the primary source....I wonder how ?"

I don't know. Fitz had a waiver, but he didn't necessarily know it was the primary source. Because even the primary source may not have known that he was Novak's primary source.

But he (the source) obviously does now, and so does Fitz.

The source may have given Novak the go-ahead to talk with Fitz, but not to disclose it in public, and not in print. Novak would be obliged to adhere to that (unless he wants to burn sources, which he'd never do, or else become a persona non grata in DC).

So the question is, why hasn't Fitz indicted the primary source?


68 posted on 07/12/2006 6:23:09 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

"And coupled with the statement that the leaker called Novak later to explain his mistaken exposure of Ms. Plame, this still allows for Wilson to be the primary source. "

Extraodinarily doubtful. Especially considering that Novak says the source is not a "political gunslinger". Wilson is certainly a political back-shooter.


69 posted on 07/12/2006 6:24:21 AM PDT by BadAndy ("Loud mouth internet Rambo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: YOUGOTIT
Which, if I read the FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulations) correctly and all the training I have had on the regulations would mean that she violated a federal law in getting a sole source contract for her husband. She and he should be in court for violation of a federal law, which several people have been tried, convicted and sent away for a long time for violating.

Nooooo. Don't you see that Joey was uniquely qualified and willing to do something no body else in the whole world was willing to do? Just ask him.

70 posted on 07/12/2006 6:27:26 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (There are only a few absolute truths in life, everything else is just an opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
3. The "fact" that Joe Wilson's wife worked for the CIA was "inadvertantly" revealed in a conversation. I.E, "Hey, you know his wife works for the CIA."
4. Novak looked up the name of the wife in Who's Who. ...........

That is more dot connecting than the CIA was willing to do prior to 911

71 posted on 07/12/2006 6:32:18 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (There are only a few absolute truths in life, everything else is just an opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator

Excellent analysis, and it makes sense, too! Thanks for decoding it for us.


72 posted on 07/12/2006 6:37:48 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (Another reason to love Southerners: The way they pronounce Hillary as "Hell-ary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LS
Rush Limbaugh today: I'll be on, 2nd hour.

Great! What's your topic?

73 posted on 07/12/2006 6:40:47 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: twigs

My book, "America's Victories: Why the U.S. Wins Wars and Will Win the War on Terror."


74 posted on 07/12/2006 6:43:38 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

75 posted on 07/12/2006 6:46:31 AM PDT by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal

Novak's on FOX? And you think he's a wise, elder statesman? He's the right wing version of David Broder. Wise, elder statesman= tired, old hack.


76 posted on 07/12/2006 6:51:22 AM PDT by Huck (Hey look, I'm still here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator

From an article on the Google News Page:

"Howard Kurtz of The Washington Post spoke with Novak today, and then reported: "Novak said he and Rove had differing recollections of what happened when he asked about Plame." Novak recalls Rove saying, "Oh, you know that, too?" Rove, according to his spokesman Mark Corallo, has said he responded, "I've heard that, too."


77 posted on 07/12/2006 6:54:31 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
The question to me is "will the Administration continue to lay down and take the thousand cuts inflicted on it in the Plame Affair?"

The White House and the Administration can't even seem to muster the will and energy to investigate treasonous newspapers and leakers even though they are charged with the protection of this country and its citizens.

I have long since disabused myself of the notion that the President and all the President's Men will ever go on the offensive on virtually ANYTHING, nor will they ever make more than token efforts to address the frightening misinformation doled out to the public hourly by the MSM.

This results in wound after wound inflicted on the Republican Party. I'm convinced that this White House is callously indifferent to political matters that pertain to the success of the Republican party in future elections.

There's little if any party leadership. When was the last time anyone heard the President say anything of value as the political leader of the GOP? Indeed, the party is divided and the conservative base is alienated over immigration and other issues. Does the President really care?

It appears the bleeding from a thousand cuts will continue unabated on every issue of importance due to the administration as a whole refusing to defend itself or to refute malicious propaganda or treasonous behavior.

I'm almost at the point I don't care anymore. Every time I hope and pray our president, our GOP leaders, our Justice Department, etc. will come out of hiding and investigate or fight back on some issue, I'm let down.

Are conservative talking heads, conservative columnists, conservative bloggers, the National Review and conservative sites like FR supposed to carry the whole load and do all the trench work for a totally detached White House, an out-of-touch Administration as a whole, the RNC, etc.?

We keep looking for the leadership to actively refute the Goebbel's media, but it's always a seemingly-impossible dream which foils our clawing at the air to grasp it.

Leni

78 posted on 07/12/2006 7:12:07 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Him and his wife Valerie should be frog marched and charged with misusing public funds.


79 posted on 07/12/2006 7:22:24 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kempster

Well .. he wrote a book .. but I'm not sure it made him a "forture". But .. I don't even remember the name of it .. LOL!


80 posted on 07/12/2006 7:22:29 AM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson