Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stylin19a

"seems Fitz knew the primary source....I wonder how ?"

I don't know. Fitz had a waiver, but he didn't necessarily know it was the primary source. Because even the primary source may not have known that he was Novak's primary source.

But he (the source) obviously does now, and so does Fitz.

The source may have given Novak the go-ahead to talk with Fitz, but not to disclose it in public, and not in print. Novak would be obliged to adhere to that (unless he wants to burn sources, which he'd never do, or else become a persona non grata in DC).

So the question is, why hasn't Fitz indicted the primary source?


68 posted on 07/12/2006 6:23:09 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: angkor

Because there was nothing revealed that was covered by Law.


87 posted on 07/12/2006 8:12:37 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: angkor
So the question is, why hasn't Fitz indicted the primary source?

Because the Primary Source hasn't broken any laws...........

92 posted on 07/12/2006 8:39:57 AM PDT by Red Badger (Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson