WHY BIN LADEN WANTS HOME DELIVERY OF THE NEW YORK TIMES

7.11.06 | Mia T

[Mia T]

WHY BIN LADEN WANTS HOME DELIVERY OF THE NEW YORK TIMES
by Mia T, 7.11.06

IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
(Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)

by Mia T, 6.27.06

"What is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary."

James Madison

hen the founders granted 'The Press' special dispensation, they never considered the possibility that traitors in our midst would game the system. But that is precisely what is happening today. (Hate America? Support jihad? Become a 'journalist!')

This was bound to happen.

The premise behind the First Amendment as it applies to the press--that a vigilant watchdog is necessary, sufficient--indeed, possible--to protect against man's basest instincts--is tautologically flawed: The fox guarding the White House, if you will.

Walter Lippmann, the 20th-century American columnist, wrote, "A free press is not a privilege, but an organic necessity in a great society." True in theory. True even in Lippmann's quaint mid-20th-century America, perhaps. But patently false in this postmodern era of the bubbas and the Pinches.

When a free and great society is hijacked by a seditious bunch of dysfunctional, power-hungry malcontents and elitists, it will remain neither free nor great for long. When hijacked by them in the midst of asymmetric warfare, it will soon not remain at all.

If President George W. Bush is serious about winning the War on Terror, he will aggressively pursue the enemy in our midst.

Targeting and defeating the enemy in our midst is, by far, the more difficult task and will measure Bush's resolve and courage (and his independence from the MPRDC (mutual protection racket in DC)) more than any pretty speech, more even than 'staying the course.'

No government ought to be without censors; and where the press is free no one ever will.

Thomas Jefferson
Letter, September 9, 1792, to George Washington

It is hard to believe that a man is telling the truth when you know that you would lie if you were in his place.

H. L. Mencken

READ MORE

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006

WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES
(Please see post 65)


The Devil & the Gray Lady


IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
(Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)


PINCH SULZBERGER, PEARL HARBOR + TREASON
WHY WE MUST PROSECUTE THE NEW YORK TIMES


WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?


WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN"
(DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)


'MAKE IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO.
(HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)


ON THE FICTIONALIZED MEMOIR (HEAR HILLARY IN SF)^{~PART TWO~}
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF HILLARY AND JANE IN SAN FRANCISCO


THE (oops!) INADVERTENT (TERRORISM) ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON (HEAR HILLARY IN SF) ^{~PART ONE~}


IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY


BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE


CHENEY: CALL THEM REPREHENSIBLE
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES₅


sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)


THE LEFT'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans


HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR
PROLIFERATION IN THE AGE OF CLINTON


QUID PRO COAL2:
CLINTON CORRUPTION + THE SEQUESTRATION OF GASEOUS FOSSILS
(HILLARY DOES COAL AT THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB)


SUSAN ESTRICH ON "DREDGING UP" THE RAPE OF JUANITA BROADDRICK + "ALL THAT OLD CLINTON STUFF"


UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."


ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE
(and doesn't even know it)


MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)



THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY
(DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) -- part1: clinton's "Brinkley" Lie


AFTERWORD: ON CLINTON SMALLNESS
(BRINKLEY MISSES THE POINT)

WHY HILLARY IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS A NATIONAL-SECURITY NO-NO^{PART ONE}

[Mia T]

fyi

[Mia T]

Katz's ping

[dennisw]

http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=all&q=katz%27s+salami&m=text

[Mia T]

The NY Slimes tried to downplay the revenues going to the government due to the tax cuts today. The tax cuts have made our good economy. Americans have more money to spend. Corporations and top earners have more money to spread around. It works !!!!!

Recall hillary's 9/11 exploitation of Chelsea.

[Mia T]

great! thanx. :)

[dennisw]

Here's great Katz's photo which took me a few minutes to extract from it's website

http://bobjagendorf.smugmug.com/gallery/117683/24/4231085

http://www.smugmug.com/community/Signs/keyword/salami

 

[Mia T]

wonderful ;)

[Gail Wynand]

Bush has the infuriating patience of Lincoln without the eloquence. His handling of the economy has been brilliant, his political acumen great, the verdict is simply not in on Iraq.

No, he will not prosecute NYT treason, but nothing prevents average Americans from spitting on these people, e.g., Sultzberger, Matthews, HRC, Boxer, etc. or their agents, when we meet them on the street. Indeed, the time for "street justice" up to and including historic forms of political expression akin to tar and feathers may be near.

What we need to know about the Left is that they are not merely misguided, nor do they share our "values" while simply adhering to a different path of attainment. The Left is evil. They are sick with a political contagion that is lethal to freedom. There is no meaningful difference between "democratic socialism" and soviet communism, other than the facade of legitimacy attained by a political majority consisting of the compensated, the illiterate, the illegally present, the conditionally informed such as via the "fairness doctrine", and the intellectually crippled, such as those who are seduced by infintile notions of science like "environmentalism". Atop both the overtly communist and leftist "progressive" movements are the same power hungry totalitarians (e.g. HRC / President of Zimbabwe). They have engaged in subversion and demagoguery, encouraging our enemies, and compounding the difficulty faced by our armed forces, solely for their selfish interest in discrediting Bush and "red state" values he represents, if only nominally at times.

Again the war on the home front, against the fifth column of subversion, sedition and treason, openly flaunted by the NYT, the MSN and the democrat leadership, is in the long run the most important battle facing America today.

[boo4]

Many thanks Mia, that's good stuff!

[malia]

bump!!!! another good one!!!!!!

[Mia T]

Bush has the infuriating patience of Lincoln without the eloquence.

Without eloquence, patience can easily look like pigheadedness. Without perspicuity, it probably is.

[Mia T]

'MISBEGOTTEN' TIMES
(NARROWNESS, MR. SULZBERGER, NOT WIDTH)

PINCH'S NON-APOLOGY APOLOGY

by Mia T, July 18, 2006

READ MORE