Posted on 07/05/2006 6:58:07 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback
At the turn of the century, a prominent Christian led a movement to transform American culture. He stood up for the weak and downtrodden. He pointed out the connection between Darwinism and the nastier parts of American life. And, for his trouble, he was labeled a “fanatic” and a “demagogue.”
The “turn of the century” I’m referring to is the year 1900, and the Christian is William Jennings Bryan.
Bryan, whom the Christian Science Monitor called “a forgotten hero,” is the subject of a new biography titled A Godly Hero. Its author, Georgetown professor Michael Kazin, wrote the book “to gain a measure of respect for Bryan and his people.”
Given Bryan’s impact on American history, this shouldn’t be necessary. He was a three-time Democratic nominee for president, and he was Woodrow Wilson’s Secretary of State. And these were just his official duties.
Unofficially, he was regarded as the greatest orator of his age—an age when people went out of their way to hear two-hour speeches, at least the good ones. And Bryan’s were spellbinders. His “Cross of Gold” speech at the 1896 Democratic convention is widely regarded as the most electrifying political speech in American history.
Bryan’s oratory and Christian passion made him a hero to millions of ordinary Americans, many of whom named their children after him. He articulated their concerns in unapologetically biblical and moral language.
He championed reforms that we take for granted today: women’s suffrage, labor unions, and anti-trust, to name but a few. He transformed the Democratic party from a “bulwark of laissez-faire capitalism” into the party of the “little guy.”
Yet, he is a “forgotten hero.” Why? Mostly it’s because of his association with the “Scopes Monkey Trial.” His participation on the anti-evolution side gave critics like H. L. Mencken, who already hated him, a chance to caricature Bryan and “his people.”
This caricature was then immortalized by the play and movie, Inherit the Wind. If Americans are aware of Bryan at all, their image is of a Bible-thumping blowhard whose positions couldn’t withstand scrutiny.
As I’ve told you before, Inherit the Wind is a Darwinist distortion, especially in its depiction of Bryan. Bryan wasn’t opposed to the teaching of evolution. His concern was for the cultural consequences of Darwinism like “Social Darwinism” and eugenics. As he put it, “[science] can perfect machinery, but it adds no moral restraints to prevent the misuse of the machine.”
As Kazin tells us, Bryan “burned only and always to see religion heal the world.” If that sounds familiar, it should—it’s the vision that drives many Christians today. While our critics caricature us as being concerned with only one thing—sex—the truth is very different. Much of America’s humanitarian efforts in places like Sudan and North Korea are the product of the kind of passion Bryan expressed among evangelicals of his day. If Bryan were around today, he’d be a great social conservative Christian and/or political leader. Like Bryan, the Great Communicator and Populist, our goal today is to heal, not dominate. But like him, we are often caricatured for our troubles.
Let’s hope it doesn’t take a century for our efforts to gain a “measure of respect,” as well.
And, he would be unwelcome in the party of babykilling.
I'm no fan of populists, and we all know where the "party of the little guy" bit led us, but the man had a good heart.
There are links to further information at the source document.
If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
BreakPoint/Chuck Colson Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
Pick another hero, Chuck.
Ann Coulter has a great chapter on the Scopes: Monkey Trial in her book, "Godless". She debunks a lot of the myth that has permeated since "Inherit the Wind" ran, like the fact that the teacher on trial was a substitute and friend of the prosecutor - never in danger of actually going to jail. The entire trial was a publicity stunt for the town of Dayton, Ohio.
As you say, such a man would be unwelcome among Democrats. However, aside from his solid Christian credentials, I believe that WJB was very much a populist and social reformer. I think he would fit quite comfortably among the Liberation Theology folks who talk about Christ but worship Marx.
I don't mean to put WJB down -- but he lived in a time of rampant social reform and he was one of the reformers. That's not always good. Perhaps his faith would have kept him on the side of the Good Guys.
This is yet another example in a very long line of examples where the public has so very easily swallowed the lies it has been fed.
Perhaps, but then he might just have been another Joe Lieberman. Lieberman's faith is so strong it prevents him from doing much of anything on a Saturday...but permits him to vote for killing babies every time it comes up.
It's true that Bryan is unfairly dumped on for being a Bible believer, but he wasn't a hero.
He was a kind of a grandstanding blowhard, he was instrumental in pushing the socialist agenda in the US, he was one of the prime movers of Prohibition, etc.
> If Bryan were around today, he’d be...
... on the wrong side of history.
I think you're probably closer to the truth than Chuck. To me, Bryan is a prime example of good intentions leading to the wrong place.
Bryan was the definition of a creationist loser.
One wise poltico of the period compared Bryan with the Platte River... a mile wide at the mouth but only two inches deep.
If you're talking politics, I mostly agree. If you're talking science...
Geraldo in waiting, media chanting
Alternative voices shout--God is passe
You don't have to believe in the things I believe in
But we'll watch the world and see what passes away.
White Heart, "Let My People Go"
White Heart, "Let My People Go"
IOW, Bryan would have made a good party Republican today. Not a conservative by any stretch of the imagination, but a good Republican. No wonder Colson thinks he's a hero.
Dayton , Tennessee, not Dayton Ohio.
The really tricky part for Dayton, Ohio, was to get the trial held in the similarly named but much smaller city of Dayton, Tennessee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.