Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2006 3:49:32 PM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Torie; HostileTerritory; fieldmarshaldj; Clintonfatigued; Kuksool; LdSentinal; AuH2ORepublican; ...

ping!


2 posted on 06/28/2006 3:51:10 PM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
Jim Bopp, a lawyer for the Republican Party of Texas, disagreed, telling Sparks "there's been no withdrawal." Bopp said that instead, DeLay moved to Virginia, making him ineligible and triggering a state law that allows the party to select a new nominee.

If a Democrat did this we'd be calling it BS, which it is.

We denounced it when Toricelli and the Dems pulled something like this, so I hope we're going to live by our principles and not dance around and make excuses just because someone we like is doing it now.

3 posted on 06/28/2006 3:53:14 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
Sparks also said that if political parties are allowed to replace primary election winners with more popular candidates, "the abuse would be incredible."

Just ask Senator Lautenberg.

4 posted on 06/28/2006 3:53:45 PM PDT by Hillsdale Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
"Kenneth Bailey, party affairs director for the Democrats, said that if DeLay is not on the ballot, the Democrats won't be able to raise as much money and create voter interest statewide.

"He's kind of a lightning rod we use to drum up support," said Bailey."

IOW, "It takes a lot of time and effort to weave a web of lies a distortions about someone as intricately has we've done with Tom DeLay. We can't accompish that on another candidate overnight, ya know. The judge needs to take that into account!"

5 posted on 06/28/2006 3:54:28 PM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
From the Texas Election Code:

§ 145.001. METHOD FOR WITHDRAWAL AS CANDIDATE.
(a) To withdraw from an election, a candidate whose name is to appear on the ballot must request that the candidate's name be omitted from the ballot.

(b) To be effective, a withdrawal request must:
(1) be in writing and be signed and acknowledged by the candidate; and
(2) be timely filed with the appropriate authority as provided by this code.

(c) A withdrawal request filed by mail is considered to be filed at the time of its receipt by the appropriate authority.

(d) The time of a withdrawal is the time that an effective withdrawal request is filed.

(e) This section does not apply to a candidate for president or vice-president of the United States

===

How could DeLay have withdrawn if he didn't do it by writing? It doesn't appear a judge may administratively withdraw a candidate.

8 posted on 06/28/2006 3:57:11 PM PDT by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
"Sparks also said that if political parties are allowed to replace primary election winners with more popular candidates, "the abuse would be incredible."

Indeed. This type of election abuse would only be tolerated in New Jersey where Toricelli was replaced by Lautenberg because the Judge said the people had the right to a competetive race. But like I said, it is only allowed in New Jersey.

10 posted on 06/28/2006 3:58:34 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

I thought it was terrible at the time that DeLay went through the primary and then withdrew. If we lose that seat because of DeLay withdrawing, I don't want to ever see him praised on this site again. He has left Texas Republicans at the mercy of a judge. The Democrat could win by default. What happens if the House comes down to a one seat margin? Are people still going to praise DeLay?


14 posted on 06/28/2006 4:01:03 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Elect Bob Sullivan OK Governor -- Throw out Dem Gov DoLittle Henry in 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
If Delay's name stays on the ballot then he better get busy and start campaigning.
15 posted on 06/28/2006 4:01:15 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
"He's kind of a lightning rod we use to drum up support," said Bailey.

Be careful what you wish for Mr. Blivit!

Ask yourself what happens if DeLay is left on the ballot and he wins!!!!

Tom Delay will take his seat in Congress.

16 posted on 06/28/2006 4:02:25 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
LOL! Judges always make such statements to elicit clarity from the lawyers.

I'd give the headline writer an "A" for provocativity.

The Dems should file suit to have judges declare all the Republican candidates involuntarily "withdrawn" LOL!

20 posted on 06/28/2006 4:04:43 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

"He also said he is registered to vote in Virginia, already voting in that state's recent primary "

That's interesting ... far as I know, the only primary in VA this month was for the Dems


32 posted on 06/28/2006 4:33:06 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv; Dog Gone
D.G. Just between you and me... What the he!! is goin on here??? I caught a whiff of some FReeper criticising Delay over stuff that Torecelli in N.J. pulled, trying to make some sort of screwy "moral equivalance" out of it!

I find NOTHING equivalent between ANY Democrat and Delay, let alone that criminal Torecelli in N.J. So please tell me that I'm right to be a little irritated on this.

35 posted on 06/28/2006 4:53:41 PM PDT by SierraWasp (California is MEXIFORNIA , MANANA!!! The European settlers suffer from GANG-GREEN, TODAY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
Its funny.... the Democrats got Ronnie Earle to boot DeLay and now they want keep him in Sugar Land! They must really miss him or be desperate they can't use him to turn off voters to continued GOP control of Congress. No wonder they want to keep on the ballot despite the fact he no longer lives in Texas!

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

41 posted on 06/28/2006 10:15:09 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Seems like the judge has declared his affiliation with the Democrats.

When he rejects a legal and "presumed honest" statement by DeLay that he has moved, and is therefore ineligible and turns that into a "withdrawal" which is a formal action that requires a formal document....

The judge will lose. If DeLay did not file a formal withdrawal, then he did not resign.


44 posted on 06/29/2006 6:20:20 AM PDT by Paloma_55 (I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson