Posted on 06/28/2006 1:45:44 PM PDT by Dane
WE LOST THE REFERENDUM
It was a landslide.
They had that referendum on illegal immigration yesterday and the answer was clear.
People dont care.
Im not saying that as a criticism, or as accusation, but as an observation. If yesterdays Republican Primary in Utahs third congressional district was a test of the countrys sentiment on illegal immigration, it is unarguably clear that people arent that bothered by it.
At least theyre not in Utah.
Congressman Chris Cannon pounded the living snot out of challenger John Jacob. It wasnt even close. John Jacob lost in every county, jurisdiction and precinct. At no point did he lead in any category and every new report of results was more bad news. As I sat last night at the computer with his staffers, watching the results post on the Internet, it was clear that by the time 10 percent of the precincts had posted that the race was lost.
So Ive got egg on my face.
I attacked Chris Cannon ruthlessly. I was John Jacobs loudest and most passionate defender. His loss is also my loss. His failure to represent the interests of the people is also my failure to read the interests of the people. What I thought was important was clearly unimportant to the voters. And in a republic, the voters are always right.
It turns out that Salt Lake Citys two daily newspapers, and Provos newspaper, the states other talk-show host, and most of the states politicians were all more in touch with the sentiments of the Republicans in the Third District than I was. It is clear that their general liberalism is a better reflection of voter sentiment than my rabid conservatism.
And I should have known that. Instead, I was blinded by my desire to evangelize the world to my view of freedom a decidedly conservative and Constitution-based view. But Utah is not a politically conservative state. It is dominated by the Republican Party, but not by conservative Republicans. The governor is a moderate to liberal, one senator is a moderate and the other is arguably a liberal. The last two governors were moderate to liberal and the attorney general is moderate to liberal.
Those are not accusatory labels, they are merely demonstrations of the consistently expressed will of the people. When Utahns go to the polls, they often pick moral conservatives, but rarely pick political conservatives. More typically they go for social liberals.
And they rarely go for political challengers from the right.
So, logically, John Jacobs campaign was doomed from the beginning. And I should have known that. I probably did know that, but chose to ignore it, caught up in the talking-head argument that this was the time and place the people would rise up against government neglect of the border and acceptance of illegal immigration.
That argument made sense. This was the chance. It was the chance for conservatives in the Republican Party to call to account the ruling liberal wing of the party. But that is not what the voters wanted.
And that cant be ignored.
If this was a referendum on illegal immigration, it seems the people want Senate over House, Kennedy over Tancredo. It seems that Chris Cannons 10 years of being the open-borders guy in the House is something the Republicans in Utahs Third District wanted to reward.
Again, that is not an accusation. It is not bitterness. It is an observation. The landslide re-election of an incumbent is not a call for change in that incumbents conduct or in the direction of his party. It is a ratification and approval of what they both have stood for.
George Bush and Vicente Fox won last night. It was a fair fight, I made the issue as clear as I could, and people chose what I wasnt selling. Which is their right and the great beauty of our republic.
We tried to make our stand, and we got steamrollered. We can take comfort in knowing that we did our best, and we can seethe in the bitterness of knowing that it didnt do any good. It was duty done, but pointlessly.
And I apologize for that. For taking up so much of your time with this issue. For being so passionate about something for which there is not a public enthusiasm. For being clearly out of touch with what Republicans want. For misreading the potential of this election.
It is impossible to ignore the fact that Chris Cannon won this primary by a larger margin than he won the primary two years ago. Last times $50,000 campaign did better than this times $700,000 campaign. And even that second figure is uncertain. It is possible that John Jacobs campaign ran out of money a month ago, that it was underfunded. It is possible that John Jacob was a poor candidate.
But it is also irrelevant.
In his concession remarks he bypassed a prepared speech John Jacob said that the results of the election showed that Chris Cannon has support in Washington.
Actually, thats not right.
The results showed that Chris Cannon has support in the Third District.
His constituents have known him for a decade and they seem overwhelmingly to like him and what he does. The referendum failed. Its business as usual business with which the voters seem completely content.
If this primary was an opening battle in the war to bring the Republican Party back to its conservative roots, we got massacred. And that will be noticed and have consequences. We conservatives hoped to show momentum and strength and didnt. And we may have hurt our cause substantially as a result. Opposition to illegal immigration has been hurt, and so has the attempt to chastise the party. We fell flat on our face, and to the winner go the spoils.
Politics is like baseball. When you lose, you congratulate the winner and walk off the field.
Chris Cannon won because he represented what people want. He won the election. He deserves congratulations.
Wasn't this the race where one of the candidates started talking about Satan?
This is a blog posting, not a legitimate news source.
Yes, John Jacob was the one who told the editorial board of the Salt Lake Tribune that satan was basically out to get him becuse he couldn't raise enough money, and then asked them not to print it.
Of course before the primary a score of people were telling me that it wouldn't make a difference in Utah and then today on another thread another Jacob supporter said it did(after the primary results came in).
I'll tell you one thing politics is a fascinating study of human behavior.
"I saw Jacob on TV , he came across a bit strange. Sorry, but first impressions are everything."
It takes an outstanding candidate to unseat an incumbent and more so in a primary off season vote.
Definition of a moonbat: A guy who thinks someone who panders to illegals and La Raza is a conservative.
I'm really curious about this one.
I understand why in California or Texas, illegal aliens are a big issue. They are, after all, there.
I live in Pennsylvania, a cold weather state that's losing population. Right now, Republican incumbant Senator Rick Sanatorium is running radio ads discussing his opposition to illegal aliens.
From what I can see, quite bluntly, Pennsylvania could use illegal immigrants, even those that have children and user city services. We need young people. Our school taxes are absurd because huge buildings with few students are being maintained. A few extra students would not kill us and would probably help the vitality of our area. And I daresay the same is true of hospitals and other institutions that are overloaded elsewhere in the country.
My foggy impression is that Utah is a similar type of location - another cold weather place losing population to the South and West. Per Wikipedia, it would have lost population without migration from outside of the US.
I would think that the 60,000-odd people who immigrated into the state from a foreign country would be easily absorbed into a population of 2.5 million, and therefore illegal immigration would not be much of a concern, if not any at all.
So why on earth would someone run on an anti-illegal platform in a state where there are not enough illegals to matter?
I think illegals would be largely welcome in most states where populations are shrinking or treading water. The big problems with illegals in California are due to huge numbers that strain resources locally. I'll bet if we could encourage them to migrate more evenly throughout the country we would have little problem absorbing them.
But I think most Mexicans and other illegals would have a very hard time living in cold weather states.
Thoughts?
D
I don't think the Mormons see illegal immigration in quite the same light as other folks.
"I will give Lonsberry some credit, he noticed and admitted that there is a world outside his echo chmaber"
Maybe u can invite him up the the Great Blue State for a Philly Cheese Steak.
Take out some of his Novice mistakes, The presidents phone calls
and you have a different ending.
""Right now, Republican incumbant Senator Rick Sanatorium is running radio ads discussing his opposition to illegal aliens.""
As far as I know Casey doesn't disagree with Santorum there so it seems senseless for that reason too.
If the jobs are there, people will migrate, irrespective of the climate of the land of their origins.
"REFERENDUM"?
Nope, when one of the contestants loses his mind and starts blaming "the devil" for his slipping in the polls there is no referendum to be held.
Rational people will either hold their noses and vote for the SANE candidate, or stay home.
Looking at the turn out, most stayed home.
If the RNC, White House, or open border lobby think this is their new weather vane, they are also delusional.
Make illegal entry a felony, close the border, fine the employers, begin asset forfeiture, make the invaders deport themselves!
I think what this election showed is that the voters of Utah don't care. It was a weak turnout. Cannon had the money and GW/Laura Bush making phone calls.
Anyone wishing to be on/off this pinglist please PM me!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.