Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WE LOST THE (IMMIGRATION)REFERENDUM
Lonsberry.com ^ | 6/28/06 | Bob Lonsberry

Posted on 06/28/2006 1:45:44 PM PDT by Dane

WE LOST THE REFERENDUM

It was a landslide.

They had that referendum on illegal immigration yesterday and the answer was clear.

People don’t care.

I’m not saying that as a criticism, or as accusation, but as an observation. If yesterday’s Republican Primary in Utah’s third congressional district was a test of the country’s sentiment on illegal immigration, it is unarguably clear that people aren’t that bothered by it.

At least they’re not in Utah.

Congressman Chris Cannon pounded the living snot out of challenger John Jacob. It wasn’t even close. John Jacob lost in every county, jurisdiction and precinct. At no point did he lead in any category and every new report of results was more bad news. As I sat last night at the computer with his staffers, watching the results post on the Internet, it was clear that by the time 10 percent of the precincts had posted that the race was lost.

So I’ve got egg on my face.

I attacked Chris Cannon ruthlessly. I was John Jacob’s loudest and most passionate defender. His loss is also my loss. His failure to represent the interests of the people is also my failure to read the interests of the people. What I thought was important was clearly unimportant to the voters. And in a republic, the voters are always right.

It turns out that Salt Lake City’s two daily newspapers, and Provo’s newspaper, the state’s other talk-show host, and most of the state’s politicians were all more in touch with the sentiments of the Republicans in the Third District than I was. It is clear that their general liberalism is a better reflection of voter sentiment than my rabid conservatism.

And I should have known that. Instead, I was blinded by my desire to evangelize the world to my view of freedom – a decidedly conservative and Constitution-based view. But Utah is not a politically conservative state. It is dominated by the Republican Party, but not by conservative Republicans. The governor is a moderate to liberal, one senator is a moderate and the other is arguably a liberal. The last two governors were moderate to liberal and the attorney general is moderate to liberal.

Those are not accusatory labels, they are merely demonstrations of the consistently expressed will of the people. When Utahns go to the polls, they often pick moral conservatives, but rarely pick political conservatives. More typically they go for social liberals.

And they rarely go for political challengers from the right.

So, logically, John Jacob’s campaign was doomed from the beginning. And I should have known that. I probably did know that, but chose to ignore it, caught up in the talking-head argument that this was the time and place the people would rise up against government neglect of the border and acceptance of illegal immigration.

That argument made sense. This was the chance. It was the chance for conservatives in the Republican Party to call to account the ruling liberal wing of the party. But that is not what the voters wanted.

And that can’t be ignored.

If this was a referendum on illegal immigration, it seems the people want Senate over House, Kennedy over Tancredo. It seems that Chris Cannon’s 10 years of being the open-borders guy in the House is something the Republicans in Utah’s Third District wanted to reward.

Again, that is not an accusation. It is not bitterness. It is an observation. The landslide re-election of an incumbent is not a call for change – in that incumbent’s conduct or in the direction of his party. It is a ratification and approval of what they both have stood for.

George Bush and Vicente Fox won last night. It was a fair fight, I made the issue as clear as I could, and people chose what I wasn’t selling. Which is their right and the great beauty of our republic.

We tried to make our stand, and we got steamrollered. We can take comfort in knowing that we did our best, and we can seethe in the bitterness of knowing that it didn’t do any good. It was duty done, but pointlessly.

And I apologize for that. For taking up so much of your time with this issue. For being so passionate about something for which there is not a public enthusiasm. For being clearly out of touch with what Republicans want. For misreading the potential of this election.

It is impossible to ignore the fact that Chris Cannon won this primary by a larger margin than he won the primary two years ago. Last time’s $50,000 campaign did better than this time’s $700,000 campaign. And even that second figure is uncertain. It is possible that John Jacob’s campaign ran out of money a month ago, that it was underfunded. It is possible that John Jacob was a poor candidate.

But it is also irrelevant.

In his concession remarks – he bypassed a prepared speech – John Jacob said that the results of the election showed that Chris Cannon has support in Washington.

Actually, that’s not right.

The results showed that Chris Cannon has support in the Third District.

His constituents have known him for a decade and they seem overwhelmingly to like him and what he does. The referendum failed. It’s business as usual – business with which the voters seem completely content.

If this primary was an opening battle in the war to bring the Republican Party back to its conservative roots, we got massacred. And that will be noticed and have consequences. We conservatives hoped to show momentum and strength and didn’t. And we may have hurt our cause substantially as a result. Opposition to illegal immigration has been hurt, and so has the attempt to chastise the party. We fell flat on our face, and to the winner go the spoils.

Politics is like baseball. When you lose, you congratulate the winner and walk off the field.

Chris Cannon won because he represented what people want. He won the election. He deserves congratulations.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: aliens; baybuchanan; cannon; election2006; hannity; housemanager; immigrantlist; immigration; impeachmentmanager; jacob; owned; pwn3d; rushlimbaugh; savage; tancredo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-291 next last
To: WhiteGuy

Maybe you could tell me why, if there are so many of you folks out there why the sock puppet lost so big? Are you all just a lot of talk?


161 posted on 06/28/2006 8:12:18 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

Comment #162 Removed by Moderator

To: Streaky
Personally I'm in favor of a reasonable approach, much like the one addressed in Congressman Pence's Plan. You know, the plan that John Jacobs claims could be his own...Jacobs of course being the candidate supported by Tancredo...but then he calls the Pence Plan amnesty. Strange how that works isn't it.

The good news is that this "referendum" in Utah will probably get the Congress back on track with the Pence Plan which already had large support.

163 posted on 06/28/2006 8:16:14 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Dane

I have to say that I'm about as anti-illegal as anyone but the hysteria on the immigrant threads has turned me off. I didn't stop caring but I sure don't want to be identified by that crowd. I'll just continue what I've been doing for almost 20 yrs, call and write my lawmakers and write reasonable editorials.


164 posted on 06/28/2006 8:21:08 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiki
"I'll just continue what I've been doing for almost 20 yrs, call and write my lawmakers and write reasonable editorials."

Friend, that is exactly what the voters of Utah did last night in a very big way.

165 posted on 06/28/2006 8:22:38 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Maybe you could tell me why, if there are so many of you folks out there why the sock puppet lost so big?

Please define "you folks"


Are you all just a lot of talk?

How articulate..............

I can only speak for myself, I will not support any candidate who fails to put American sovereignty first. That means that I am more than "a lot of talk." I will support and vote for candidates who advocate this position exclusively.
166 posted on 06/28/2006 8:22:49 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (It's about the People Who Count the Votes................. - Wally O'Dell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Well, I'd have to vote for Cannon too if his opponent says things like "It's the devil's fault" this or that happened.


167 posted on 06/28/2006 8:24:51 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
That's fine. However, the borderbots couldn't oust a guy when they had almost a clear field in voter turnout so I have a feeling you are going to just get angrier as time goes by.
168 posted on 06/28/2006 8:25:11 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

Apparently, the people of Utah know a nut when they see one.


169 posted on 06/28/2006 8:25:48 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
The poor guy was used by Tancredo and he really did seem surprised that he lost. It was kind of sad.
170 posted on 06/28/2006 8:27:02 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

Comment #171 Removed by Moderator

To: muleskinner

Cannon is backed by the NRA and has an almost perfect career rating with the ACU; in other ones a strong conservative.


172 posted on 06/28/2006 8:28:05 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

You're probably right.

Viva el presidente arbusto!


173 posted on 06/28/2006 8:29:11 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (It's about the People Who Count the Votes................. - Wally O'Dell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Streaky
"Pence's plan is junk."

I really do hate to break this to you sparky but Jacobs supported Pence's plan and Tancredo supported Jacobs. So is it only junk when it's not your sock puppet proposing it?

174 posted on 06/28/2006 8:29:35 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Dane
You almost sound like you are cheerleading posting this.

Do you own cabbage fields?
175 posted on 06/28/2006 8:30:20 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
Viva el presidente arbusto!

LOL. I think you said something about childish name calling. You are a hypocrite. Oh well carry on.

176 posted on 06/28/2006 8:30:50 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

Comment #177 Removed by Moderator

To: Streaky
So which is it?

Is the Pence plan always junk, even when your boy Jacobs supports it? Or is it just junk when it's not one of your sock puppets pushing?

I think the voters in Utah understood the question...and they weren't buying the BS you folks were trying to peddle.

178 posted on 06/28/2006 8:52:01 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

Comment #179 Removed by Moderator

To: kingu

John and Ken are SOOOO gay...


180 posted on 06/28/2006 9:18:34 PM PDT by Clemenza (The CFR ate my bilderburgers! Time to call for a trilateral commission to investigate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-291 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson