Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Day one of the UN gun ban summit
Townhall.com ^ | Jun 27, 2006 | Cam Edwards

Posted on 06/27/2006 2:19:34 PM PDT by neverdem

They’ve gathered in New York City, the best and brightest minds in the global gun ban movement. Oh, they don’t want you to think for a second that they’re actually interested in your guns. Kofi Annan as much as said so yesterday, when he told the attendees of the Small Arms Review Conference, “This Review Conference is not negotiating a ‘global gun ban’, nor do we wish to deny law-abiding citizens their right to bear arms in accordance with their national laws.” Got it, gun owners? There’s nothing to fear from the UN when it comes to your guns.

It’s too bad for Kofi that many of the countries attending the summit didn’t get his memo. Yesterday’s speeches were full of calls for expanding the current agenda to include the civilian possession of firearms. Hans Winkler, speaking on behalf of the European Union, called the current Program of Action “the key starting point for further action on small arms”. The ambassador from Australia, Robert Hill, spoke glowingly of his country’s gun laws that “require the registration and licensing of all firearms owners, prohibit a range of automatic and semi-automatic long arms and handguns, and mandate minimum firearms safety training and storage requirements.”

The statement from Indonesia’s representative was perhaps the clearest example of what these countries are aiming for.

“We believe that no armed group outside of the State should be allowed to bear weapons. We also believe that regulating civilian possession of Small Arms/Light Weapons will enhance our efforts to prevent its misuse. In our view, the issue of ammunition should also be addressed in the context of the Program of Action because in the absence of ammunition, small arms and light weapons pose no danger.”

Not every country is as transparent as Indonesia. When looking at the statements of the various representatives, what isn’t said is just as important as the words we actually hear. Take, for example, the comments by Brazilian representative Ronaldo Mota Sardenberg. He told the summit, “this Review Conference should not limit ourselves to renewing our commitment to the full implementation of the Program of Action. It should rather be taken as an opportunity to address the Program’s shortcomings, by means of the adoption of substantive aimed at strengthening and complementing its mechanisms.” In other words, what we’ve got right now doesn’t go far enough. This comes from a country tried to ban civilian ownership of firearms outright (the referendum failed last fall).

The anti-gun summit continues for the next two weeks, and you can get daily updates from http://www.NRAnews.com Executive Editor Ginny Simone every afternoon on “Cam and Company”, heard on the aforementioned NRAnews.com and Sirius Satellite Radio. Coming up on Tuesday, the United States issues its opening statement.

Cam Edwards is the host of “Cam and Company” on www.nranews.com and Sirius Satellite Radio.  A veteran talk show host and political analyst, he blogs at www.camedwards.com in addition to his daily talk show.  Cam lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and five children. 


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: New York; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; billofrights; gungrabbers; righttobeararms; secondamendment; socialistutopians; un; unfailures; ungunbansummit; unitednations; usoutofun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

1 posted on 06/27/2006 2:19:37 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Day 1 of UN Gun Summit.

Guns suck, we hate them. The US should give us more money.

Day 2222 of UN Gun summit. See day 1 notes.

2 posted on 06/27/2006 2:21:22 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
We believe that no armed group outside of the State should be allowed to bear weapons.

MOLON LABE, MF.

3 posted on 06/27/2006 2:21:32 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

From my cold, dead hands.....


4 posted on 06/27/2006 2:23:49 PM PDT by ODC-GIRL (Proudly serving our Nation's Homeland Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ODC-GIRL

People it aint gonna happen. That would be choose sides- go sign.


5 posted on 06/27/2006 2:27:07 PM PDT by samadams2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
So, an organization of Governments, in full view and total awareness of the history of the 20th century had decided that civilian use of guns is the problem.

That makes sense!!

6 posted on 06/27/2006 2:27:38 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
We believe that no armed group outside of the State should be allowed to bear weapons.

Help make genocide safe for the governments of the world. Support international gun control.

Click to download poster in PDF format

7 posted on 06/27/2006 2:27:47 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"We believe that no armed group outside of the State should be allowed to bear weapons. "

That include the U.N. " Peacekeepers " ?


8 posted on 06/27/2006 2:28:06 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
...nor do we wish to deny law-abiding citizens their right to bear arms in accordance with their national laws.

"We wish to change national laws such that law-abiding citizens can no longer bear arms in accordance with their national laws."

9 posted on 06/27/2006 2:28:31 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Did they kick it off with a 21-gun salute?


10 posted on 06/27/2006 2:28:35 PM PDT by Thom Pain (Supporting the Constitution is NOT right wing. It is centrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
We believe that no armed group outside of the State should be allowed to bear weapons.

"Our view of an ideal situation was Saddam Hussein's Iraq."

11 posted on 06/27/2006 2:30:10 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Enemy Action

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

12 posted on 06/27/2006 2:31:16 PM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Another excellent reason to keep Rudy in NOOYAWK!


13 posted on 06/27/2006 2:31:34 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (LET ME DIE ON MY FEET, IN MY SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
If the UN armed everybody it might be of a little use.
The tyrants running the UN and most of its members would quake in their boots because only armed people can do away with those tyrants.
14 posted on 06/27/2006 2:32:47 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Get the UN OUT of the US now!

They are discussing overriding our constitution.

We may not be able to stop what they discuss but we don't have to be host country to them.


15 posted on 06/27/2006 2:34:29 PM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Correction: Guns suck in the hands of people outside the UN. We want to be clear on this. Kofi Anus


16 posted on 06/27/2006 2:35:38 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: weegee

They're enjoying nice meals, too, courtesy (24 percent) of the US taxpayer.


17 posted on 06/27/2006 2:35:58 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"In our view, the issue of ammunition should also be addressed in the context of the Program of Action because in the absence of ammunition, small arms and light weapons pose no danger.”

A refreshing bit of honesty.

18 posted on 06/27/2006 2:36:50 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Ironic. I keep guns just because of the existence of the UN.


19 posted on 06/27/2006 2:37:59 PM PDT by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
the best and brightest minds in the global gun ban movement.

The average IQ of the group must be around what? 90?

20 posted on 06/27/2006 2:38:22 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson