Skip to comments.
Rush Limbaugh Under New Investigation
NY Times ^
| 6/27/06
| wire report
Posted on 06/27/2006 10:41:35 AM PDT by gopwinsin04
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-251 next last
To: gopwinsin04
OMG.. NYT's at it again... :|
To: gopwinsin04
He already explained that Bob Dole's luggage somehow got loaded onto his plane!
3
posted on
06/27/2006 10:42:54 AM PDT
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: gopwinsin04
I opened my briefcase this morning and saw my daily pill minder of prescription pills I take to work. No, they are not in the bottle. I leave that at home.
I guess if a cop stopped me on the highway and was looking for a reason to give me a hard time, he could.
I sometimes drive one mile over the speed limit as well.
:)
4
posted on
06/27/2006 10:44:19 AM PDT
by
cvq3842
To: gopwinsin04
Under the deal reached last month with prosecutors, Limbaugh was not to be arrested for any infraction for 18 months in exchange for authorities deferring a charge of "doctor shopping." Prosecutors had alleged the conservative talk-show host illegally deceived multiple physicians to receive overlapping painkiller prescriptions. Was Rush arrested at the airport?
To: gopwinsin04
Pretty lame investigation. At least Rush is having a good time on his vacations.
6
posted on
06/27/2006 10:44:47 AM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: Incorrigible
About as common to get this stuff now in MExico as it is to buy TUMS in Detroit. What's the big deal? Why don't they get real serious and go after the crack dealers in the streets of NYC and get REAL serious on the fight to stop drugs?
To: gopwinsin04
Limbaugh's doctor had prescribed the Viagra, but it was ''labeled as being issued to the physician rather than Mr. Limbaugh for privacy purposes,'' OK....first thing: Is this really illegal? If so, who is really in trouble, Rush, or the physician?
8
posted on
06/27/2006 10:45:00 AM PDT
by
edpc
(What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly - Thomas Paine, American Crisis)
To: gopwinsin04
He said he told his Doctor that he was worried about the next ELECTION.
9
posted on
06/27/2006 10:45:13 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(California bashers will be called out)
To: Incorrigible
He also said the his doctor must have been confused when he told him that he was concerned about the next election.
10
posted on
06/27/2006 10:45:22 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein(the moon is a harsh mistress))
To: gopwinsin04
How is this any different than doctors giving out samples of prescription medications without a prescription?
If he was under a doctors care and the doctor gave him the meds whether it was in the doctors name or not what's the damn difference?
11
posted on
06/27/2006 10:45:37 AM PDT
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: gopwinsin04
Why is the NY Times reporting about this? I don't see how it directly aids Al Qaeda terrorists.
12
posted on
06/27/2006 10:45:45 AM PDT
by
Coop
(No, there are no @!%$&#*! polls on Irey vs. Murtha!)
To: ElkGroveDan
That was a great line from Rush.
To: Echo Talon
Investigators confiscated the drugs, which treat erectile dysfunction.
Don't they love pounding that one into the ground.
To: ConservativeMind
as far as I know he wasn't arrested at the airport... just detained... big difference.
To: gopwinsin04
God Bless Rush. Evil is trying to ruin him.
To: gopwinsin04
He knows the liberals are out to get him and lets himself get caught with a bottle of viagra. It is kind of sad.
To: Incorrigible
I bet David or Jay will use a joke like that tonight.
To: gopwinsin04
So does this mean that you can't travel with physician's samples?
19
posted on
06/27/2006 10:49:36 AM PDT
by
white trash redneck
(Everything I needed to know about Islam I learned on 9-11-01.)
To: Coop
Why is the NY Times reporting about this? I don't see how it directly aids Al Qaeda terrorists.Yes, that's a good point. However, it's difficult to commit treason on a daily basis so at times they must revert back to simple old defamation.
20
posted on
06/27/2006 10:49:50 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-251 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson