[Coop]

Why is the NY Times reporting about this? I don't see how it directly aids Al Qaeda terrorists.

[1Old Pro]

Why is the NY Times reporting about this? I don't see how it directly aids Al Qaeda terrorists.

Yes, that's a good point. However, it's difficult to commit treason on a daily basis so at times they must revert back to simple old defamation.

[adorno]

Why is the NY Times reporting about this? I don't see how it directly aids Al Qaeda terrorists.

Oh, but it does.

Remove Rush from the airwaves (NY Times' agenda), and you remove a powerful anti-Al-Qaeda voice.

[khnyny]

[Why is the NY Times reporting about this? I don't see how it directly aids Al Qaeda terrorists.]

Getting rid of someone like Rush would certainly help people like Al Qaeda. The NY Slimes are at it again. I guess they got jealous (or something) after Rush's meeting with Bush last week.

[fhlh]

getting LimPbaugh off the air helps the terrorists (and the DNC)...

[genxer]

Why is the NY Times reporting about this? I don't see how it directly aids Al Qaeda terrorists.


Of course this does. In the drive by media's mind. If talk radio crumbles, then they would be in sole control and the democrats would win elections and there for help al-Qaeda .

See...everything they do ;)