Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MY SECOND ANN COULTER THREAD - EVOLUTION DISCUSSION (or Here We Go Again)

Posted on 06/27/2006 5:06:32 AM PDT by 7thson

Ann Coulter states in her book on page 201 -

Darwin’s theory of evolution says life on Earth began with single-celled life forms, which evolved into multicelled life forms, which over countless aeons evolved into higher life forms, including man, all as the result of the chance process of random mutation followed by natural selection, without guidance or assistance from any intelligent entity like God of the Department of Agriculture. Which is to say, evolution I the eminently plausible theory that the human eye, the complete works of Shakespeare, and Ronal Reagan (among other things) all came into existence purely be accident.

On page 202, she states The “theory” of evolution is:

1. Random mutation of desirable attributes (highly implausible)

2. Natural selection weeding out the “less fit” animals (pointless tautology)

3. Leading to the creation of new species (no evidence after 150 years of looking)

My question – is she correct in her statements? Is that Darwin’s theory?

On the ligher side, check out the first paragraph on page 212. LOL Funny!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 1youreanidiot; 2noyoureanidiot; allcapitalletters; anncoulter; anothercrevothread; evolution; flailaway; godless; hurltheinsults; nutherpointlessthred; pavlovian; picsplease; royalwasteoftime; sameposterseachtime; thesamearguments; thnx4allcaps; uselessdiscussion; wasteofbandwidth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 701-713 next last
To: Dustbunny
Yep you are right there but they are backed by fact.

Are you saying that nothing in evolution theory is backed by fact?

41 posted on 06/27/2006 5:59:53 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
Page 217:
Darwin's disciples simply assert that evolution led from this species to that by the process of random mutation-with cruel nature striking down the genetic losers- and to hell with fossil record's showing nothing of the sort."
42 posted on 06/27/2006 6:01:10 AM PDT by The Brush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

The theory of evolution does not state whether supernatural guidance has occurred or is occurring. It does not address the issue.

I am especially amused by those who try to stretch the theory to state that evolution "proves" that God did not create the stars and planets.

Evolution, of course, addresses strictly biological processes. It has nothing whatsoever to do with anything else.


43 posted on 06/27/2006 6:01:40 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dustbunny

The Theory of Relativity is still called the Theory of Relativity.

If you've ever used a GPS, the calculations are constantly adjusted for relativistic effects. Planes are guided to their destinations, and Taliban are blown up, by something that's "Just a Theory."


44 posted on 06/27/2006 6:02:28 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The Brush

How did you like the beginning of page 212?


45 posted on 06/27/2006 6:02:32 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

I agree almost completly with Ann's expressed political views. She has a devastating pen and she's almost always right on target. But, she would do herself a favor, along with the rest of us conservatives, if she would steer clear of areas obviously outside her expertise--especially evolution. For the life of me, I can't see why it's on her agenda. It's not a political issue. Well grounded opinions about evolution flow from years of study. Ann's remarks betray her ignorance and make her look like a fool to folks like me who would otherwise be staunch admirers. Worst of all, they give conservatism a black eye amoung educated people of all political stripes.


46 posted on 06/27/2006 6:03:50 AM PDT by zebra 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Brush

Anyone want to place bets on the amount of time Ann Coulter has spent examining the "fossil record?"


47 posted on 06/27/2006 6:04:22 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Now, the problem is that a belief in Evolution really requires a belief in "magic"

Ohhhhh, no sorry that is incorrect.

48 posted on 06/27/2006 6:06:27 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Man Law: You Poke It, You Own It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

From the current political situation worldwide one can draw the conclusion that if the theory of selection of the fittest is to occur and a few mutations along the way then: when the whole world is destroyed by war the selected species will be insects!


49 posted on 06/27/2006 6:07:55 AM PDT by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
OK, you are right, Ann is wrong, Darwin is a fact and GOD did not create the world. /sarc

I am not a believer in the 6,000 year theory. To GOD one of our seconds could(theory) be a million years. Who knows, we will just all have to wait and see.

50 posted on 06/27/2006 6:08:23 AM PDT by Dustbunny (Amazing Grace how sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

"Probably because they're the people surrounded by clear evidence of evolution all the time."


Please state one proof!!


51 posted on 06/27/2006 6:13:51 AM PDT by Russ_in_NC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: Strategerist

I know this may sound childish - and if so, I guess I have yet to evolve into an adult - but how much time have you spent looking at the fossil record? For that matter, who on FR has spent the most time looking at the fossil record?


53 posted on 06/27/2006 6:19:29 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

To: zebra 2

She states in her book that back in the 80's, the Chinise uncovered fossils before the Cambrian(sp) period that tends to disprove the theory of evolution. When a school teacher brought this up in class - a biology teacher - with no reference to God, the ACLU got involved and the school teacher was fired. What she is stating about evolution, is that the liberals embrace it to such a degree that they will not abide any argument against it in the public school system.


55 posted on 06/27/2006 6:22:45 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
The theory of evolution does not state whether supernatural guidance has occurred or is occurring. It does not address the issue.

Yes it does. It's about natural processes. Natural equals not supernatural therefore it is about how things happen apart from any supernatural explanation.

I am especially amused by those who try to stretch the theory to state that evolution "proves" that God did not create the stars and planets.

The theory of evolution goes beyond just biology. Read sky and telescope for a while.

Evolution, of course, addresses strictly biological processes. It has nothing whatsoever to do with anything else.

So when the field of astronomy uses the word evolution they don't really mean evolution?

56 posted on 06/27/2006 6:22:55 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (More and more churches are nada scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: zebra 2
I think you are missing the point of people like me (and Ann), who see a difference between accepting scientific thought and accepting secular zealotry, which pushes beyond what is actually known.

A bit off subject, but I see very little difference between a television psychic and an archaeologist that recreates an entire civilization from a few shards of pottery. Have you read my post #31?

Why do your politics demand religious purity (in this case lack of religion)? I don't demand that Conservatives be Christians.
57 posted on 06/27/2006 6:23:31 AM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

Perhaps I was not clear in my post. What I said was "This is the way I see it" meaning ME. That was my opinion unless I specifically attributed parts to Ann. Sorry for the confusion.


58 posted on 06/27/2006 6:23:39 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: Vaquero; Junior; Ichneumon
Thanks for the ping, but I was away from the computer for an hour and I missed it until now. It's a bit too late for me to use my ping list. The thread already has over 50 posts, and it's pretty much taken on a life of its own. There will be other Coulter threads ...
60 posted on 06/27/2006 6:27:03 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 701-713 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson