Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush slams leak of terror finance story ["The disclosure of this program is disgraceful,"....]
Yahoo ^

Posted on 06/26/2006 8:23:26 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Bush slams leak of terror finance story

10 minutes ago

President Bush on Monday sharply condemned the disclosure of a secret anti-terrorism program that taps into an immense international database of confidential financial records. "The disclosure of this program is disgraceful," he said.

"For people to leak that program and for a newspaper to publish it does great harm to the United States of America," Bush said. He said the disclosure of the program "makes it harder to win this war on terror."

The program has been going on since shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. It was disclosed last week by several news organizations.

Using broad government subpoenas, the program allows U.S. counterterrorism analysts to obtain financial information from a vast database maintained by a company based in Belgium. It routes about 11 million financial transactions daily among 7,800 banks and other financial institutions in 200 countries.

"Congress was briefed and what we did was fully authorized under the law," Bush said, talking with reporters in the Roosevelt Room after meeting with groups that support U.S. troops in Iraq.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush43; emptyrhetoric; msm; newyorktimes; nyt; sedition; treason; treasontimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-280 next last
To: TexKat

Thanks, TK, for providing that speech.

"If you want to figure out what the terrorists are doing, you try to follow their money. And that's exactly what we're doing."

Yes. FOLLOW THE MONEY.

The President, as usual, is absolutely right.


121 posted on 06/26/2006 9:51:44 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I will go down with this ship, and I won't put my hands up in surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

I meant to actually CALL OUT the newspapers...but, you know, there are too many people that believe everything they read.


122 posted on 06/26/2006 9:52:30 AM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The Left hates America


123 posted on 06/26/2006 9:53:44 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (The Left hates America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Tony on Cspan now:

"The public's right to know may jeopordize someone's right to live!"

I nominate THAT as quote of The Day!!!!!!!!!!!


124 posted on 06/26/2006 9:54:53 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Is that all we're going to get? Jaw-boning?

I wish President Bush were as interested in expanding liberty at home as he is abroad and as eager to alienate domestic opponents as he is our allies.


125 posted on 06/26/2006 9:55:02 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Are you watching this Frm. Prosecutor on FNC ... Jayne Weinstrub ???

I am going to smack my TV

She says how do we know this Amdinistration won't break laws in the future

Now they are accusing the President of something HE NEVER DID

GRRRRRR


126 posted on 06/26/2006 9:55:45 AM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePb6H-j51xE&search=Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: The G Man

Man that Times clown just looks like a lib. The type that
got beat up a lot on the play ground, and swore to get even when he grew up. I guess being the Benedict Arnold of his time makes him feel that that he is somebody. He disgusts me.


127 posted on 06/26/2006 9:56:14 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

She is a slimy you-know-what grrrr..

I'm listening to Tony Snow White House pc on Cspan...LIVE:)


128 posted on 06/26/2006 9:57:05 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
"That said, I think such a case can be made, and is probably being forged right now"

1. Prosecute NYT reporters under Sedition Act, or

2. Subpoena NYT reporters and compel them to divulge names of leakers in the government. When they refuse to divulge, jail them for contempt and let them rot.

Did I leave anything out?
129 posted on 06/26/2006 9:57:15 AM PDT by rockthecasbah (Don't wait for 6 strong men to take you to church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
but it is possible that the previous cases COULD be about ready to be prosecuted...which might make the White House less inclined to overreact to this one...knowing what is coming later.

Good point Sleuth! Wish I had thought of it! ;*)

130 posted on 06/26/2006 9:57:50 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4Irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
[Jayne Weinstrub] says how do we know this Amdinistration won't break laws in the future

I don't know, Jane. How do we know you won't get addicted to drugs and become a crack ho?

131 posted on 06/26/2006 9:58:25 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I hate asshat Islamics with Scuds in their Volkswagen Minivans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

I am soooooooooooooooo sick of these people

grrrrr

Switched to Cspan1


132 posted on 06/26/2006 9:58:29 AM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePb6H-j51xE&search=Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: rockthecasbah

I don't think you left anything out. When the AG pursues the case, that evidence better be crushing. In my opinion, it is, but it has to be so in court, as well.

My hope is that the NYT gets crushed!


133 posted on 06/26/2006 9:59:57 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Have I missed what the President's going to do about this?


134 posted on 06/26/2006 10:01:12 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The G Man
there is a negative and a positive side to this situation, on the plus side, it will force the terrorists to use other means, which may lead to easier apprehension, on the negative side; the terrorists have a better understanding of US technical ability
135 posted on 06/26/2006 10:01:46 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The NYT & WP are on the side of the Terrorists.


136 posted on 06/26/2006 10:02:49 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Treasonous bastards


137 posted on 06/26/2006 10:03:43 AM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; notigar
Bush condemns disclosure of secret anti-terror program

The program has been going on since shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. It was disclosed last week by the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times.

The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times reported that the records were examined under a series of broad U.S. subpoenas, with the Times reporting that Treasury officials did not seek individual court-approved warrants or subpoenas to examine specific transactions.

The Journal also said the existence of the program may be controversial in Europe and other parts of the world, and within the global banking industry, which has long worried about the privacy of transactions.

Both newspapers said audits of the program are conducted to make sure that data searches are based on intelligence leads about suspected terrorists. And both said administration officials say the program has been important to both disrupting terrorist activity and to catching those responsible for attacks.

138 posted on 06/26/2006 10:04:12 AM PDT by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

I don't know if you've been listening to Rush's show today but the sub that's in for Rush had AG Gonzales as a guest. On this particular issue, Gonzales was very mum, not commenting, premature, etc.

Next guest was Edwin Meese. Meese said there was certainly enough ground to launch an investigation at the Slimes.

Point is, the DoJ is being cagey, keeping mum and getting the bases covered. I believe (hope!) that Meese gave us a heads up on what to expect.


139 posted on 06/26/2006 10:04:35 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (It takes ideas and optimism to win elections. The DemocRATS have neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
I firmly believe nothing would make Pinch happier than to see another terrorist disaster in America.

If they'd hit the Slimes building, I could be tempted to agree.

Ok, not really. Just kidding.............mostly.

140 posted on 06/26/2006 10:06:09 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (It takes ideas and optimism to win elections. The DemocRATS have neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson