Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MO Senate Poll: Jim Talent Trails Claire McCaskill by 6 points
KMOV ^

Posted on 06/24/2006 3:57:01 PM PDT by waterloofan

A tighter race is looming in the battle for the United States Senate. GOP incumbent Jim Talent trailed democrat Claire McCaskill by a slim 3 points in January.

Now, McCaskill's lead is six points and McCaskill's edge mirrors Nixon’s in the governor’s race.

She leads among women by 13%, and independent voters by 14%.

McCaskill leads big in St. Louis City, and has a 12% edge in St. Louis County.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: election2006; electioncongress; jimtalent; mo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Anybody knows how reliable this poll is? It's strange that this MO race seldom gets polled. Most pundits are focused on RI, PA, MT, MN etc...
1 posted on 06/24/2006 3:57:04 PM PDT by waterloofan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: waterloofan

The change is still within the margin of error. Most polls have shown that Jim Talent is in trouble, including Rasmussen (branded as the most reliable pollster when people like the results).


2 posted on 06/24/2006 3:59:48 PM PDT by AntiGovernment (A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waterloofan; AntiGuv

It is a poll under the name of a liberal newspaper. It is meaningful only if it can be compared to a previous poll by the same outfit, whatever that outfit is. Still it sucks. Talent is an intelligent senator, and it would sadden me greatly to see him go down in the tide. Maybe my fellow psephological guru on this site has some thoughts.


3 posted on 06/24/2006 4:03:55 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGovernment

It's all about turnout, turnout, turnout. Who is the most motivated. I know I would walk across broken glass to vote for my Conservative Republican Congressman, Dave Weldon. I just hope Missouri Republicans are similarly motivated.


4 posted on 06/24/2006 4:04:24 PM PDT by AdvisorB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: waterloofan

I don't know about this particular poll. But it is over four months until the election. In politics, that is almost an eternity. Most people haven't even begun to think about the election. So, I wouldn't get my panties in a bunch over this poll. To the Libs, polls always begets news. But curiously, the resultant news ALWAYS favors the Libs. Let them revel in drinking their bath water.


5 posted on 06/24/2006 4:05:42 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Memo to GOP: Don't ask me for any more money until you secure our Southern border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Hello,

I will be calling Senator Talent's local office in about 2 weeks, to offer my help with his reelection effort.


Glad to be here, MOgirl
6 posted on 06/24/2006 4:10:09 PM PDT by MOgirl (Democrats: The Culture of Treason (and you know what I'm talkin about!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MOgirl

More from ...
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/8CD39743858142E086257197005F0EAB?OpenDocument

Among 800 likely voters polled last week, 49 percent supported state Auditor Claire McCaskill, a Democrat, in her quest to replace U.S. Sen. Jim Talent, R-Mo. That compared to 43 percent who favored retaining Talent, who has been in office since 2003. The remaining 8 percent were undecided.

Missouri voters say they're willing to spend more tax dollars to restore Medicaid coverage to 90,000 residents, and strongly support increasing the state's minimum wage for workers.

They also continue to overwhelmingly embrace a ballot proposal that would protect many forms of embryonic stem cell research, and one to increase the state's tobacco taxes.


MO sucks!! They agree to the baby-killing stem cell research!


7 posted on 06/24/2006 4:15:00 PM PDT by waterloofan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: waterloofan
MO sucks!! They agree to the baby-killing stem cell research!

No we don't. Were pretty solidly red. The Post-Dispatch always writes stuff like this. When I first moved here I thought Missourians supported every tax increase on the planet. Wrong. And you would not believe the money they have poured into this stem cell initiative. Fancy tv ads all the time. They imply that the research, which they never say is going to be embronic stem cells paid for with tax dollars, will cure absolutely everything and that this initiative simply is to insure that, if these miracle cures become available, folks in the state won't be prohibited from benefitting from them. It is the most dishonest thing I have ever seen

8 posted on 06/24/2006 4:20:21 PM PDT by Bahbah (Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: waterloofan
Hello,

MO sucks, huh?

1) You automatically believe this poll, huh? Are you familiar with the St. Louis Post? Enough said.

2) Where the hell do you live? Perhaps if I learn that, I can accuse your state of SUCKING, even though you live there. Or, perhaps because you do live there.

MOgirl
9 posted on 06/24/2006 4:21:56 PM PDT by MOgirl (Democrats: The Culture of Treason (and you know what I'm talkin about!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MOgirl; waterloofan

LOL. Were not ganging up on you, water. The state is quite conservative. If we can prevent the voter fraud in St. Louis and Kansas City, I'm pretty sure we'll be alright and keep Jim Talent in the Senate.


10 posted on 06/24/2006 4:24:27 PM PDT by Bahbah (Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Don't read too much into this poll by the Liberal Left-wing rag called the Post Dispatch. My wife's Grandparents labeled the Post a YELLOW JOURNAL in the early 20th century.
Hasn't changed its spots. Probably 5-6 points off because of its bias.


11 posted on 06/24/2006 4:27:56 PM PDT by golfisnr1 (look at a map)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: waterloofan

Missouri's new voter ID law goes into effect for the November 2006 election requiring a picture ID. I hope it reduces the criminal voting in St. Louis and Kansas City by the democrats. I believe it will have the desired effect because the democrats have their skivvies in a jammy packed wad over the law.


12 posted on 06/24/2006 4:29:35 PM PDT by anchorclankor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1

The Post-Dispatch, which I have not subscribed to in years (I won't even buy the Sunday edition for the ads), is our very own Pravda.


13 posted on 06/24/2006 4:31:26 PM PDT by Bahbah (Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: waterloofan

"Anybody knows how reliable this poll is?"

Talent is finito. He voted for the Senate immigration bill. McCaskill is running on enforcement first. It's all over her website.


14 posted on 06/24/2006 4:31:32 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Oh lookie. A borderbot pushing for the defeat of a Republican. How original.
15 posted on 06/24/2006 4:32:18 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Apparently Being Mean to a Troll is Now Against the Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: waterloofan

Here's her website

http://www.claireonline.com/

Clearly she's making immigration a major issue of her campaign.

In Tennessee and Virginia the Dem and Repub Senate candidates are all against the Senate bill and for enforcement. In Ohio both sides are for the Senate bill. In Nebraska the Republican running against Nelson has publicly supported the Senate bill. Nelson will be reelected. Dem Cantwell in Washington is IMO finished for her support of the Senate bill, the Republican is against.


16 posted on 06/24/2006 4:37:23 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

In 2002 the final S.L. P-D poll had Talent and Carnahan tied at 48%.


17 posted on 06/24/2006 4:46:34 PM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Hello,

Everything I read here on FR said that Talent voted against the Senate Immigration Bill. Do you have a source
that he did vote for it?

Glad to be here, MOgirl
18 posted on 06/24/2006 4:49:20 PM PDT by MOgirl (Democrats: The Culture of Treason (and you know what I'm talkin about!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

The problem in MO, as seen from TN, is the liberal democratic infrastructure. There appears to be a lot of fraud and judicial activism for any Republican to overcome.


19 posted on 06/24/2006 4:51:51 PM PDT by Ingtar (Prensa dos para el inglés)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Smorch
It's all about turnout, turnout, turnout. Who is the most motivated.

Yes, but only in very close elections. If Talent is trailing McCaskill by 42-48%, then no amount of turnout will prevent him from going down. However, if it's something like 47-47%, then turnout will certainly help (even if the undecideds break for the challenger).
20 posted on 06/24/2006 4:53:23 PM PDT by AntiGovernment (A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson