Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sad thing is, US military bases are equally revealing, showing structures, berths, dry docks, vessels, and giving the exact latitude and longitude readings that would make smart weapon targeting very easy. A country without sufficient resource has an on-the-cheap military satellite system for targeting and analysis built into Google earth.

IMHO, the department of defense should require goolge earth to blur out pictures of our vital bases post haste .

1 posted on 06/22/2006 8:50:03 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: Jeff Head
the department of defense should require goolge earth to blur out pictures of our vital bases post haste.

Then China will just buy photos from someone else if they want it. It's just the reality of the modern world.
2 posted on 06/22/2006 8:54:20 AM PDT by cripplecreek (I'm trying to think but nothing happens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

A target rich environment!


4 posted on 06/22/2006 8:57:28 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Vely intelesting.


5 posted on 06/22/2006 8:57:39 AM PDT by Disambiguator (I'm not paranoid, just pragmatic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Interesting.

When I view my home on Google Earth a power plant in our area is blurred out. I just presumed it would be the same for U.S. Military bases.


6 posted on 06/22/2006 8:57:45 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

It looks like they painted a bullseye on the deck of that aircraft carrier for us to aim at.



I predict that when the Chicoms see these photos, Google will be persona nongrata in Beijing.


10 posted on 06/22/2006 9:01:48 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Too bad Google earth satellite images are not more current. Know images I've viewed are about 3 years old.


11 posted on 06/22/2006 9:02:28 AM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head; stylecouncilor; windcliff
Great pix, JH. Thanks.

sc,w, ping.

13 posted on 06/22/2006 9:02:52 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Google Earth picks tend to be a minimum of 4 years old, sure they might help targeting some but you have no idea what's changed between then and now. And it's not like they're the only source for this old data, they've just compiled stuff that already in the public domain and put it in a sexy UI.


15 posted on 06/22/2006 9:06:19 AM PDT by discostu (get on your feet and do the funky Alphonzo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Hi Jeff,

Using these coordinates is quite another thing. On our GPS sats there is a signal that's in the clear and another sub-band message. While one is transmitted in the clear the other is for DOD use only. The system is set-up to cut off the signal that's available to the public and only transmit the DOD message during a time of war.
This is why the Europeans are setting up a network of their very own. Milsat is a completely different system than GPS BTW.


16 posted on 06/22/2006 9:06:46 AM PDT by STD (Rough Sailing Directly Ahead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
There is an interesting  article at The Register 

Google Earth threatens democracy

Military hardware laid bare to Godless commies


I thought I had posted it here but a search couldn't come up with it
27 posted on 06/22/2006 9:24:12 AM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Does google get their images from one source or from multiple sources? Many pictures from Silicon Valley are so sharp that you can clearly see individual cars in intersections. But pictures of the area where I grew up are at such a poor resolution that you can't even tell where the high school's football field is.


28 posted on 06/22/2006 9:27:10 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

You do know that google earth is not a live feed, don't you? These are deliciously old pictures.


38 posted on 06/22/2006 9:52:06 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I hate asshat Islamics with Scuds in their Volkswagen Minivans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Cool. I tried to do exactly this with the Beta version several months ago with no luck.


41 posted on 06/22/2006 9:54:49 AM PDT by Antoninus (I don't vote for liberals -- regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
Not exactly. I can stand in Norfolk VA harbor in my two-bit open boat and get GPS locations more accurate.

What you should have noticed is that there were SO FEW ships present.

What matters is real-time intelligence: if the Chinese ships (on average were 90% in port up until a week ago), but now are 90% at sea, THEN the implication is frightening, particularly if they spent the prior two months loading ammo and missiles.

If a dock that sat empty for 7 years is one constantly mooring two or 4 ships now, then you can begin drawing conclusions about re-deploying assets to an area where they might attack.
51 posted on 06/22/2006 10:10:08 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

The genie's already out of the bottle. How are you going to blur out images of our vital bases ... that potential enemies saw and saved in their files years ago?


52 posted on 06/22/2006 10:14:56 AM PDT by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
IMHO, the department of defense should require goolge earth to blur out pictures of our vital bases post haste.

NASA has similar downloadable satellite image software. It's called World Wind. This is a link to the World Wind website.

I plan to download it this weekend and, if I like it, will probably delete Google Earth.

55 posted on 06/22/2006 11:12:41 AM PDT by Wolfstar (Where you go with me, heaven will always be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

If such images are available to the public, imagine what our military has....

But one thing about your concern... Keep in mind that the Google Earth photos are not "live" or "streaming". Those pictures are likely months or even years old.

Yes, the specific location of said facilities can be found, but equipment, ships, missiles, etc. can be moved.


56 posted on 06/22/2006 11:18:04 AM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
I downloaded the free version of Google Earth and I can't figure out how to use it. I can't even find an icon or the program on the program list. I know this must sound really stupid, but how do I start it up?

Carolyn

61 posted on 06/22/2006 11:44:48 AM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

I had a cousin who worked for the Dept. of Homeland Security, who once called another relative and asked them to walk outside and wave up at the sky.

Suffice it to say the technology our guys are using is much better than Google Earth.


67 posted on 06/22/2006 11:53:31 AM PDT by BaBaStooey (I heart Emma Caulfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

I wish someone with the time and knowledge would use Google Earth to build presentations of major battles, such as showing the movements of troops during the battle of Stalingrad.


74 posted on 06/22/2006 12:04:17 PM PDT by Sensei Ern (http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy/ "Born to be M-I-I-I-LD!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson