Sad thing is, US military bases are equally revealing, showing structures, berths, dry docks, vessels, and giving the exact latitude and longitude readings that would make smart weapon targeting very easy. A country without sufficient resource has an on-the-cheap military satellite system for targeting and analysis built into Google earth.
IMHO, the department of defense should require goolge earth to blur out pictures of our vital bases post haste .
1 posted on
06/22/2006 8:50:03 AM PDT by
Jeff Head
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: Jeff Head
the department of defense should require goolge earth to blur out pictures of our vital bases post haste.
Then China will just buy photos from someone else if they want it. It's just the reality of the modern world.
2 posted on
06/22/2006 8:54:20 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(I'm trying to think but nothing happens)
To: Jeff Head
A target rich environment!
4 posted on
06/22/2006 8:57:28 AM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Jeff Head
5 posted on
06/22/2006 8:57:39 AM PDT by
Disambiguator
(I'm not paranoid, just pragmatic.)
To: Jeff Head
Interesting.
When I view my home on Google Earth a power plant in our area is blurred out. I just presumed it would be the same for U.S. Military bases.
To: Jeff Head
It looks like they painted a bullseye on the deck of that aircraft carrier for us to aim at.
I predict that when the Chicoms see these photos, Google will be persona nongrata in Beijing.
To: Jeff Head
Too bad Google earth satellite images are not more current. Know images I've viewed are about 3 years old.
To: Jeff Head; stylecouncilor; windcliff
Great pix, JH. Thanks.
sc,w, ping.
13 posted on
06/22/2006 9:02:52 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: Jeff Head
Google Earth picks tend to be a minimum of 4 years old, sure they might help targeting some but you have no idea what's changed between then and now. And it's not like they're the only source for this old data, they've just compiled stuff that already in the public domain and put it in a sexy UI.
15 posted on
06/22/2006 9:06:19 AM PDT by
discostu
(get on your feet and do the funky Alphonzo)
To: Jeff Head
Hi Jeff,
Using these coordinates is quite another thing. On our GPS sats there is a signal that's in the clear and another sub-band message. While one is transmitted in the clear the other is for DOD use only. The system is set-up to cut off the signal that's available to the public and only transmit the DOD message during a time of war.
This is why the Europeans are setting up a network of their very own. Milsat is a completely different system than GPS BTW.
16 posted on
06/22/2006 9:06:46 AM PDT by
STD
(Rough Sailing Directly Ahead)
To: Jeff Head
There is an interesting article at The
Register
Google Earth threatens democracy
Military hardware laid bare to Godless commies
I thought I had posted it here but a search couldn't come up with it
27 posted on
06/22/2006 9:24:12 AM PDT by
grjr21
To: Jeff Head
Does google get their images from one source or from multiple sources? Many pictures from Silicon Valley are so sharp that you can clearly see individual cars in intersections. But pictures of the area where I grew up are at such a poor resolution that you can't even tell where the high school's football field is.
28 posted on
06/22/2006 9:27:10 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: Jeff Head
You do know that google earth is not a live feed, don't you? These are deliciously old pictures.
38 posted on
06/22/2006 9:52:06 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(I hate asshat Islamics with Scuds in their Volkswagen Minivans.)
To: Jeff Head
Cool. I tried to do exactly this with the Beta version several months ago with no luck.
41 posted on
06/22/2006 9:54:49 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(I don't vote for liberals -- regardless of party.)
To: Jeff Head
Not exactly. I can stand in Norfolk VA harbor in my two-bit open boat and get GPS locations more accurate.
What you should have noticed is that there were SO FEW ships present.
What matters is real-time intelligence: if the Chinese ships (on average were 90% in port up until a week ago), but now are 90% at sea, THEN the implication is frightening, particularly if they spent the prior two months loading ammo and missiles.
If a dock that sat empty for 7 years is one constantly mooring two or 4 ships now, then you can begin drawing conclusions about re-deploying assets to an area where they might attack.
51 posted on
06/22/2006 10:10:08 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Jeff Head
The genie's already out of the bottle. How are you going to blur out images of our vital bases ... that potential enemies saw and saved in their files years ago?
To: Jeff Head
IMHO, the department of defense should require goolge earth to blur out pictures of our vital bases post haste.NASA has similar downloadable satellite image software. It's called World Wind. This is a link to the World Wind website.
I plan to download it this weekend and, if I like it, will probably delete Google Earth.
55 posted on
06/22/2006 11:12:41 AM PDT by
Wolfstar
(Where you go with me, heaven will always be.)
To: Jeff Head
If such images are available to the public, imagine what our military has....
But one thing about your concern... Keep in mind that the Google Earth photos are not "live" or "streaming". Those pictures are likely months or even years old.
Yes, the specific location of said facilities can be found, but equipment, ships, missiles, etc. can be moved.
56 posted on
06/22/2006 11:18:04 AM PDT by
TheBattman
(Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
To: Jeff Head
I downloaded the free version of Google Earth and I can't figure out how to use it. I can't even find an icon or the program on the program list. I know this must sound really stupid, but how do I start it up?
Carolyn
61 posted on
06/22/2006 11:44:48 AM PDT by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: Jeff Head
I had a cousin who worked for the Dept. of Homeland Security, who once called another relative and asked them to walk outside and wave up at the sky.
Suffice it to say the technology our guys are using is much better than Google Earth.
67 posted on
06/22/2006 11:53:31 AM PDT by
BaBaStooey
(I heart Emma Caulfield.)
To: Jeff Head
I wish someone with the time and knowledge would use Google Earth to build presentations of major battles, such as showing the movements of troops during the battle of Stalingrad.
74 posted on
06/22/2006 12:04:17 PM PDT by
Sensei Ern
(http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy/ "Born to be M-I-I-I-LD!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson