Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/19/2006 7:22:44 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: LdSentinal

this is hugh... :)


2 posted on 06/19/2006 7:24:58 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

I certainly hope this doesn't stop either one of them from running. Once America gets wind of Kerry's military record and Hillary's winning personality I'm certain they'll change their minds... I toughest question will be; "Which one is the very best?"


4 posted on 06/19/2006 7:26:49 PM PDT by The Brush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
I wonder why CNN only polled Rudy, McCain and Jeb....? Why not Allen or Romney?
5 posted on 06/19/2006 7:27:33 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

Nigh anyone who voted for Kerry would also vote for Clinton. That small slice of Ohio made all the difference, and it could happen that way again in 2008.


6 posted on 06/19/2006 7:27:42 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
sounds like the dems need another Ross Perot to get back in office.
8 posted on 06/19/2006 7:33:31 PM PDT by martinidon (Bush won sKerry lost and Soro's is out millions for nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

The rats will deliver 47% of the national vote to whatever commie leftist loser traitor who happens to claw his/her way to the front of the pack. And they'll try to close the gap by endowing illegal aliens and dead people with "the right to vote".


10 posted on 06/19/2006 7:35:11 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

Herself could STILL get elected on a plurality with a third-party candidate in the race, much like the 1992 race was decided.

H. Ross Perot probably confused the electoral picture in this country for the next twenty years, at least.


11 posted on 06/19/2006 7:47:03 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
This is rubbish. No person who voted for Kerry in 2004 will abstain from voting because Hillary is the nominee. People will be far madder at Bush in 2008 than they were in 2004, and Hillary will get all of Kerry's vote.

And...the chic, newly registered vote, which I personally think would give her the election were a bland Republican like Allen or Rudy to run.
13 posted on 06/19/2006 7:50:37 PM PDT by TeenagedConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

Sorry LdSentinal, I meant to post my reply #12 to YOU, the instigator of this thread!! LOL!


16 posted on 06/19/2006 8:07:55 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

17 posted on 06/19/2006 8:13:25 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

What would we do without polls?


23 posted on 06/19/2006 8:32:31 PM PDT by Huck (Hey look, I'm still here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

Considering this is a DNCNN poll the true number is 55%, these peoples minds are not going to change no matter how many commercials. And just when we were told how America loves the coclintons??

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


35 posted on 06/19/2006 9:44:22 PM PDT by bray (Hey Zaqueeri, say hello to Hitler, Stalin and Mohamhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
I guarantee Hillary's negatives will go down. She will be a major contender and I would be very surprised, even stunned, if she did not get the Democrats nomination.
37 posted on 06/19/2006 9:47:35 PM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

My guess is that 20% of the no votes were the kook left wing base being angry with her over the war. Probably 15% of those would 'come back home' for a general election vote, but the poll is still good news.


39 posted on 06/19/2006 10:00:27 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
Hi noooo,

Hi noooo,

It's off to vote we go!
41 posted on 06/19/2006 10:12:17 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devolve; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; bitt; Boazo; dixiechick2000; Smartass; Lady Jag

42 posted on 06/19/2006 10:46:00 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal
Regarding potential Democratic candidates, 47 percent of respondents said they would "definitely vote against" both Clinton, the junior senator from New York who is running for re-election this year, and Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, the party's candidate in 2004.

The other 53% simply puked.

45 posted on 06/19/2006 10:54:38 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

Sounds wonderful. Now, if Shrillery would win the convention and within 72 hours discover that her ABSOLUTELY NO vote had risen to 85% . . . it would be even more wonderful.


46 posted on 06/19/2006 11:02:47 PM PDT by Quix (PRAY AND WORK WHILE THERE'S DAY! Many very dark nights are looming. Thankfully, God is still God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

THE DECLINE OF HILLARY CLINTON: THE DYNAMICS
(SHE HAS ONLY ONE WAY TO GO. AND IT ISN'T UP.)


THE POLITICS OF DUMPING HILLARY (see post 53)


'HILLARY'S BIGGEST PROBLEM... SHE'S OLD NEWS'


SUSAN ESTRICH ON "DREDGING UP" THE RAPE OF JUANITA BROADDRICK + "ALL THAT OLD CLINTON STUFF"


TIRE INFLATION, GAS STATIONS + THE NEED TO SEQUESTER HILLARY


Nina Burleigh: Do the Right Thing, Hillary


'HIATUS' FOR HILLARY?


IS REUTERS SENDING A MESSAGE ABOUT A COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF HILLARY?




ON REJIGGING GALLUP'S LOSING NUMBERS FOR HILLARY
THE ALTERNATE UNIVERSE OF ANNE KORNBLUT



SEE VIDEO: "HILLARY IS 'DOOMED'" (more 'plantation' fallout)


HILLARY'S EXPOSED LEFT FLANK 'SCARES THE HORSES' (VIDEO)


HEAR CHRIS MATTHEWS + MAUREEN DOWD DEVOUR HILLARY


THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)


ESTRICH IMPEACHED BY HER OWN WORDS,
EXPOSES STOCK HILLARY PLOY: EXPLOIT WOMEN
my amazon.com review


STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: ED KLEIN AND SUSAN ESTRICH AGREE ABOUT HILLARY


HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes




61 posted on 06/20/2006 7:05:02 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

This will not phase Hitlery, with her winning personality she will be able to turn the tide and win over these ungrateful peasants. LOL.. Amen.


68 posted on 06/20/2006 7:45:48 AM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson