Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Starbucks targeted over high-fat products (no banana mocha Frapp, no banana cream crunch bar)
REUTERS ^ | Fri Jun 16, 2006

Posted on 06/16/2006 6:41:22 PM PDT by Liz

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Starbucks Corp. may be next on the target list of a consumer-health group that this week sued the operator of the KFC fried chicken restaurant chain for frying foods in oils high in harmful trans fat.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest said it is planning to campaign against the global cafe chain because of the increased risk of obesity, heart disease and cancer associated with high-calorie, high-fat products it sells. And the possibility of legal action against Starbucks, similar to the case it is taking against KFC owner Yum Brands Inc., has not been ruled out, said CSPI executive director Michael F. Jacobson. "Regular consumers of Starbucks products could face Venti-sized health problems," Jacobson said, referring to Starbucks' use of the 'Venti' designation for 'large.'

The group is primarily funded by newsletter subscribers and individual donors. It has support in the campaign from the small IWW Starbucks Workers Union, which has members in three stores, all in New York. They would like Starbucks to list nutrition information -- which is currently available online and in store brochures -- on its menu boards. "Customers can ask for nutrition information, but when you're talking about a transparent business in a busy world, that's not enough," union organizer and Starbucks "barista" staff member Daniel Gross said in an interview. He said the company should use healthier shortenings without trans fat, and publicize its smallest size, "short," which is available but does not appear on the menu. Continued...

The union contends that Starbucks staff gain weight when they work at the chain. They are offered unlimited beverages and leftover pastries for free during their shifts.

A 20-ounce Venti banana mocha Frappuccino with whipped cream contains 720 calories and 11 grams of saturated fat, and a banana cream crunch bar weighs in at 630 calories and 25 grams of saturated fat. By comparison, a McDonald's Corp. Big Mac has 560 calories and 11 grams of saturated fat.

A Starbucks spokesman said in a statement it is "actively researching" alternatives to high-fat products. The company said it plans to eliminate trans fat from

seasonal baked goods -- but not necessarily other products -- by this fall. "In our beverage ingredients, we have reformulated any component that contained significant artificial trans fat content," the spokesman said. Wendy's International Inc. and Panera Bread Co. have recently announced efforts to reduce or eliminate trans fats from their menus. Trans fat is an artery-clogging solid fat found in partially hydrogenated oils.

"Most people are taking the trans fat out of their foods because they raise the risk of heart disease and obesity," said Marion Nestle, professor of nutrition at NYU.

"There's a lot of pressure to do so, especially since the (KFC) lawsuit." Jacobson said Starbucks may have been spared the scrutiny fast-food chains received recently because of its health-conscious image. "People expect foods from Dunkin' Donuts to be unhealthy, but Starbucks has more of an upper middle class, healthy, hip, politically correct facade," Jacobson said. "But the food is just as harmful to your arteries." © Reuters 2006. All Rights Reserved.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; badfat; cspi; doomandgloom; foodpolice; geeksquad; healthypeople; healthypeople2010; liberals; michaeljacobsen; nannystate; obesity; sokaiya; starbucks; wereallgonnadie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-175 next last
To: Liz; Vision; doug from upland; RepoGirl; MaDuce; EBH; SaveTheChief; spectre; MAexile; GatorGirl; ...
the center for science in the public interest wants t hear from you

Center for Science in the Public Interest 1875 Connecticut Ave. N.W. Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20009 Main switchboard: (202) 332-9110 Fax: (202) 265-4954 General e-mail address: cspi@cspinet.org

61 posted on 06/16/2006 8:09:09 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

>>>>The Center for Science in the Public Interest is primarily funded by newsletter subscribers and individual donors.


AND NGO grants!


62 posted on 06/16/2006 8:11:39 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: benjaminjjones

ROFLMAO!!!!
Just great post!!!!

I am so with you on this...I have begun an addiction to Checkers' french fries followed by McDonalds hot fudge sundae.

Yeesh.


63 posted on 06/16/2006 8:12:54 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Moderate Mooslims.....what's that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker
Once you've had a Starbucks, other coffee seems weak and watered down.

I agree, but I'd include some other coffee chains and independent coffeehouses as well. I don't mind at all paying a buck and a half for a black coffee -- if it's good coffee.

What I don't understand is the $4 lattes and similar that they sell. If I was gonna dump cinnamon, chocolate, vanilla, as well as the mass quantities of sugar and cream which clearly annoy the "Center for Science in the Public Interest" into my coffee, then I'd start with cheap coffee, not the good stuff.

64 posted on 06/16/2006 8:13:06 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (Some people are like Slinkies: totally useless, but fun to throw down a stair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

I just finished my dinner of 5 slices of Round Table Meat Lover's Pizza, two beers, and a cigarette. After dinner, a black helicopter flew circles around my house. Must be the food police.


65 posted on 06/16/2006 8:13:13 PM PDT by dc27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker
Keepin an eye out on ya! ;o)

I heard you were on a thread about "drinkable sludge" & by golly(!) here ya are! ;o)

66 posted on 06/16/2006 8:13:46 PM PDT by Millee (Tancredo 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Vision
Just like Rush talked about today.

It's communism's way.

67 posted on 06/16/2006 8:14:24 PM PDT by rvoitier ("And if talk is cheap anywhere, perhaps it is cheapest, quite frankly, in the Congress." Vitter(R-La)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: benjaminjjones

That is so funny. But so true! ROFL!

'seben-de-lebben'


68 posted on 06/16/2006 8:16:22 PM PDT by phantomworker ("I wouldn't hurt you for the world, but you are standing where I am about to shoot..."--Quaker quote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Liz

...and another thing...

I find the concept of Starbucks baristas with IWW membership cards amusing.

"Brothers and sisters, the class struggle is over. We have met the bourgeoisie and they is us."


69 posted on 06/16/2006 8:16:27 PM PDT by RichInOC (Life is short. Have dessert first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision
Here's Rush's piece on these out of control bastards.
70 posted on 06/16/2006 8:16:44 PM PDT by rvoitier ("And if talk is cheap anywhere, perhaps it is cheapest, quite frankly, in the Congress." Vitter(R-La)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vision
I agree this is out of control.. I want to know where they get their donors from... Why do those donors donate to such a nutty cause when there are other really important things to worry about?? Like say for instance immigration, giving the country to socialists, and eminent domain??? I'm truly lost.

Or, I am just stupid..

71 posted on 06/16/2006 8:17:10 PM PDT by abner (Looking for a new tagline- Next outrage please!- Got it! PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS LOST IN THE USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Millee

ROFL!!! You heard right. Drinkable sludge thread here. Is that like skid row for coffee addicts? I appreciate ya keeping an eye out for me (or is that poking an eye out for me?) What would I do without my favorite stalker? I have your back, too, Millee. ;)


72 posted on 06/16/2006 8:21:54 PM PDT by phantomworker ("I wouldn't hurt you for the world, but you are standing where I am about to shoot..."--Quaker quote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

Ok, this one is definitely for YOU! Suddenly Taxman has a craving for Starbucks and POPULAR CULTURE! The world is spinning its axis on Africa! ;-)


73 posted on 06/16/2006 8:21:57 PM PDT by abner (Looking for a new tagline- Next outrage please!- Got it! PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS LOST IN THE USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker
Is that like skid row for coffee addicts?

LOL - At $4 a cup??? Hardly! ;O) Have a great night dear! Hopefully we can catch up over the weekend!

74 posted on 06/16/2006 8:28:36 PM PDT by Millee (Tancredo 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Can you say sokaiya?


75 posted on 06/16/2006 8:29:16 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina

Right. What's the difference between a $3 cup of coffee that will knock your socks off and make your toes curl and a $7 bottle of regular beer at a bar. Same price markup.

I actually buy the coffee by the pound and make it at home. Costs less than 25 cents a cup. I would not pay that price for coffee except if I was away from home and on an expense account or as a special treat. People who would waste their money on that everyday are a bit foolish IMHO.


76 posted on 06/16/2006 8:30:19 PM PDT by phantomworker ("I wouldn't hurt you for the world, but you are standing where I am about to shoot..."--Quaker quote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; Liz


No coffee for you!


77 posted on 06/16/2006 8:30:47 PM PDT by devolve (fx AMERICANS_KILLED_IN_2003_BY_ILLEGALS FBI-DOJ_REPORT_4380+4745=9125 NO__NUEVO__TEJAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Yummy.

78 posted on 06/16/2006 8:36:51 PM PDT by Liz (The US Constitution is intended to protect the people from the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Millee
drinkable sludge

Change that to UNdrinkable sludge, and you will perfectly describe Starbucks coffee.

79 posted on 06/16/2006 8:37:29 PM PDT by Gabz (Proud to be a WalMartian --- beep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Why don't these people just not patronize the places that serve things they don't want?

Damn, it is NOT rocket science.

80 posted on 06/16/2006 8:38:55 PM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson