Skip to comments.Starbucks targeted over high-fat products (no banana mocha Frapp, no banana cream crunch bar)
Posted on 06/16/2006 6:41:22 PM PDT by Liz
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Starbucks Corp. may be next on the target list of a consumer-health group that this week sued the operator of the KFC fried chicken restaurant chain for frying foods in oils high in harmful trans fat.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest said it is planning to campaign against the global cafe chain because of the increased risk of obesity, heart disease and cancer associated with high-calorie, high-fat products it sells. And the possibility of legal action against Starbucks, similar to the case it is taking against KFC owner Yum Brands Inc., has not been ruled out, said CSPI executive director Michael F. Jacobson. "Regular consumers of Starbucks products could face Venti-sized health problems," Jacobson said, referring to Starbucks' use of the 'Venti' designation for 'large.'
The group is primarily funded by newsletter subscribers and individual donors. It has support in the campaign from the small IWW Starbucks Workers Union, which has members in three stores, all in New York. They would like Starbucks to list nutrition information -- which is currently available online and in store brochures -- on its menu boards. "Customers can ask for nutrition information, but when you're talking about a transparent business in a busy world, that's not enough," union organizer and Starbucks "barista" staff member Daniel Gross said in an interview. He said the company should use healthier shortenings without trans fat, and publicize its smallest size, "short," which is available but does not appear on the menu. Continued...
The union contends that Starbucks staff gain weight when they work at the chain. They are offered unlimited beverages and leftover pastries for free during their shifts.
A 20-ounce Venti banana mocha Frappuccino with whipped cream contains 720 calories and 11 grams of saturated fat, and a banana cream crunch bar weighs in at 630 calories and 25 grams of saturated fat. By comparison, a McDonald's Corp. Big Mac has 560 calories and 11 grams of saturated fat.
A Starbucks spokesman said in a statement it is "actively researching" alternatives to high-fat products. The company said it plans to eliminate trans fat from
seasonal baked goods -- but not necessarily other products -- by this fall. "In our beverage ingredients, we have reformulated any component that contained significant artificial trans fat content," the spokesman said. Wendy's International Inc. and Panera Bread Co. have recently announced efforts to reduce or eliminate trans fats from their menus. Trans fat is an artery-clogging solid fat found in partially hydrogenated oils.
"Most people are taking the trans fat out of their foods because they raise the risk of heart disease and obesity," said Marion Nestle, professor of nutrition at NYU.
"There's a lot of pressure to do so, especially since the (KFC) lawsuit." Jacobson said Starbucks may have been spared the scrutiny fast-food chains received recently because of its health-conscious image. "People expect foods from Dunkin' Donuts to be unhealthy, but Starbucks has more of an upper middle class, healthy, hip, politically correct facade," Jacobson said. "But the food is just as harmful to your arteries." © Reuters 2006. All Rights Reserved.
This is out of control
People don't have to go to Starbucks. That having been said, I have no problems with making them give disclosures about content and fat so people can make an informed decision.
They can have my brownie bites and Vente Cafe Americano (with whole milk and one Equal) when they pry them from my cold dead hands.
IT'S CALLED FREEDOM OF CHOICE!
No one is forcing anyone to eat, drink, and be merry!
I guess when we have lawyers and the government to look after us, we don't need to worry about such things anymore.
I didn't know that. Good for Starbucks.
I'm surprised they didn't call it "Heart attack in a cup."
The food Nazis go berzerk!
Although there is kind of a poetic justice about the liberal Starbucks being attacked by their own kind.
I would rather pay $2.10 (incl.tax) for my Great One with Cream and Splenda from good ol' Dunkin Donuts than $5.00+ for anything from Starbuck's anyhow!
This an offshoot of two of Ralph Nader's communist disciples. Here's the skinny: http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/13
even one of the most left leaning corporations in this country is not immune from the socialist element that they befriended all these years.
||Not in a socialist, nanny state, it's not.|
All of this will come to pass if Democrats regain control of Congress this year.
Somebody needs to get the stones to countersue these quacks. Where are they getting the money to file lawsuits all over the place?
How many calories I put into my body is no more business of anyone else than whether or not I wear a seat belt.
I am for disclosure, I want to know what I am eating. if Starbucks would post what is in that banana drink on a chart in the store, no one would buy it.
ths issue is, how are you supposed to know if its not disclosed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.