Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Top 8 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Is a Weaker Candidate Than People Think
Human Events Online ^ | 14 June 2006 | John Hawkins

Posted on 06/13/2006 11:40:49 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

We’ve heard a lot about why Hillary Clinton will be a strong candidate in 2008. In fact, there are whole books on the subject.

However, Hillary Clinton is actually a much weaker candidate than many people seem to believe. Here’s a short, but sweet primer that may help explain why that is the case:

1. Likeability and Charisma

If you look back at the last eight presidential elections, at least, the more likeable candidate has won every time. That’s unfortunate for Hillary because unlike her slick, gregarious husband, she does not have the gift of gab or a warm personality. If Hillary has to pass the old, “Gee, would I rather go to a ball game, grab some pizza, or get a beer with Hillary or the Republican candidate,” test, she’s going to be in a lot of trouble unless the person asking the question is wearing a tinfoil hat or is such a radical lefty that she has a “I (heart) abortion” bumper sticker on her car.

2. Gaffes

Hillary not only lacks charisma and likeability, she’s more gaffe prone than most people seem to realize. For example, back in March she suggested that the illegal immigration bill in the House, “would literally criminalize the Good Samaritan and probably even Jesus himself.”

Then there were her wacky comments about school vouchers back in February:

“First family that comes and says ‘I want to send my daughter to St. Peter’s Roman Catholic School’ and you say ‘Great, wonderful school, here’s your voucher,’” Clinton said. “Next parent that comes and says, ‘I want to send my child to the school of the Church of the White Supremacist ...’ The parent says, ‘The way that I read Genesis, Cain was marked, therefore I believe in white supremacy. ... You gave it to a Catholic parent, you gave it to a Jewish parent, under the Constitution, you can’t discriminate against me.’”

As an adoring, if somewhat puzzled, audience of Bronx activists looked on, Clinton added, “So what if the next parent comes and says, ‘I want to send my child to the School of the Jihad? ... I won’t stand for it.”

Criminalizing Jesus? Cain and the Church of the White Supremacist? The School of Jihad? What?!? You put this woman in front of a camera for a year, in a presidential campaign, where every word the candidate utters is scrutinized like the Zapruder tape and she’ll give plenty of ammunition to her opponent.

3. She Can’t Win in the South

The only two Democratic candidates for the presidency who’ve won elections since Lyndon Johnson was in office have been two Southern governors, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. Why were they able to win? Because unlike John Kerry or Al Gore, they were able to win southern states. Northern liberals like Hillary? They don’t do well in the South and Hillary will have a lot of difficulty reversing that trend. After all, not only is she a liberal, from a liberal state, with a liberal voting record, she apparently disliked living in the South so much that she moved to New York. Good luck connecting with the NASCAR crowd after that Hillary, ’cause you’re going to need it!

4. Hillary’s Base Problem

Here’s a little secret: a lot of liberals don’t really want Hillary as their candidate in 2008. Some of them don’t like her stance on the war. Others don’t like her close relationship with the DLC, which is perceived as being too moderate. There are even some liberals that are probably unhappy with her, as much as anything, because she has been treated like the “chosen one” for the Democrats since the 2004 election.

The result of this is that some of the more hardcore liberal activists aren’t thrilled with Hillary’s candidacy and they’re not shy about saying so. In fact, it has gotten so bad that the more time Democrats spend reading liberal bloggers, the cooler they get to Hillary. That’s not exactly the kind of reaction a candidate hopes for from people who should be some of her biggest supporters.

5. Hillary Will Increase Turnout—for the GOP

Remember how the Democrats turned out in droves in 2004 so they could vote against President Bush? Well, the same thing would happen on the Republican side if Hillary were the Democratic nominee. There are few words in the English language more terrifying to Republicans than, “President Hillary Clinton,” and it’s almost guaranteed that they will turn out in record numbers to make sure it never happens.

6. Hillary as Commander in Chief?

In general, the Democrats have serious credibility problems on national security and Hillary is not going to be the one to reverse that trend. Unlike candidates like John Kerry and Jimmy Carter, she doesn’t have a military background to fall back on. Moreover, her husband’s administration was lackadaisical about fighting terrorism and although Hillary did vote for the war in Afghanistan and Iraq, she certainly hasn’t developed a reputation as a hawk, like say Zell Miller or Joe Lieberman. Although at this point, it’s hard to know exactly what the foreign policy landscape will look like in November of 2008, it’s unlikely to be tranquil and that will be a major strike against Hillary.

7. Her Polling Numbers Aren’t Very Good

Since Hillary has been the frontrunner on the Democratic side from the moment that John Kerry conceded, she has been the subject of a lot of 2008 related polls. Unfortunately for her, those numbers haven’t looked particularly good.

For example, In mid-May of this year, Rasmussen Reports had Hillary’s unfavorable rating among adults at 39%. Another mid-May poll, from the New York Times, had 34% of Americans viewing her favorably and 35% viewing her unfavorably.

Perhaps that sort of soft support explains the results of a January 2006, CNN/Gallup poll which found that, “By a margin of three to one, Americans say they would “definitely” vote against Hillary Clinton for president.”

Given that Hillary already has extremely high name recognition, these bad numbers don’t bode well for her chances to win the presidency.

8. Baggage

Hillary is carrying around as much baggage as any of the other five candidates combined, starting with her philandering husband. In fact, there are so many controversies that have swirled around Bill and Hill than you can hardly list them all: Gennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broderick, Whitewater, selling the Lincoln bedroom, using the IRS against political enemies, selling pardons, taking the White House furniture, shady cattle futures deals, impeachment, firing the travel office staff to make room for cronies, it goes on and on and on. Discount these scandals as old news if you like, but the American people are going to think long and hard before they vote to turn the White House into the sort of sleazy circus sideshow that it was during Bill Clinton’s tenure as President.

Conclusion

Although Hillary Clinton would be far from a pushover, she’s not an unstoppable juggernaut either. To the contrary, Hillary is a deeply flawed candidate who would have great difficulty beating a credible, conservative Republican. So while it’s important not to get overconfident about a potential race against Hillary Clinton, we shouldn’t minimize her numerous weaknesses either.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; hildebeaste; hillary2008; hitlery; mrsbj; witchofwashington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: catholicfreeper
These scare me more than Hillary.
21 posted on 06/14/2006 12:26:01 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
LOL. At least I have the Ash with chainsaw bobblehead for support.

"Who's the King, baby?"

22 posted on 06/14/2006 12:29:07 AM PDT by NewRomeTacitus (respect the boomstick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

ping


23 posted on 06/14/2006 12:31:13 AM PDT by SR 50 (Larry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
Until that witch is utterly defeated I'll fear her.

You can say that again!

Add to the list #9) She bought votes in NYC. But even so, CNY counties that are typically Republican had a run for their money, and Hitlery took a few of those counties too.

I will not rest easy until she is defeated and gives up trying.

24 posted on 06/14/2006 12:32:28 AM PDT by WellsFargo94 (graduation = freedom from liberal hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: catholicfreeper

The Clinton's own the Democratic party. They'll dish dirt and reek havoc against ANYONE that gets in her way. They've done it before and they will do it again...with more deadly force. No one likes her in D.C., but they won't cross her either. BIG mistake for anyone.


25 posted on 06/14/2006 12:42:17 AM PDT by WellsFargo94 (graduation = freedom from liberal hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Reason No. 9: Her grating nasal monotone. Just the thought of hearing that voice makes me cringe.


26 posted on 06/14/2006 12:56:39 AM PDT by Huntress (Possession really is nine tenths of the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Hill's got the nomination. It's hers. The question is who do we have?


27 posted on 06/14/2006 1:01:47 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
9. She's big, fat and ugly

10. Old crusty

11. Lying lesbian

12. Big, fat and ugly. Oh, sorry, see # 9

13. Phony bug eyed, open mouth act of surprise. At everything!!!
14. Lying, America hating, commie loving bitch. Oh, excuse me, that just slipped out.

15. Fat ankles, thighs, calves like an Elephant.

16. Refuses to stay home and bake cookies for poor starving "minority" orphans.

17. N.Y. Yankees fan! Really,...I mean it.

18. Hubba Bubba.

19. See No. 9

I could go on and on. I got a million of em.
28 posted on 06/14/2006 1:14:17 AM PDT by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Let's see... which candidate should I go out for pizza and a beer with... which would be more fun... decisions, decisions.

                 

29 posted on 06/14/2006 1:20:50 AM PDT by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Also, there's her "Jew bastard" remark. For the life of me, I don't know why it doesn't get more play. Imagine Dubya saying something like that.

30 posted on 06/14/2006 1:21:26 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

"Here’s a little secret: a lot of liberals don’t really want Hillary as their candidate in 2008."

I don't think it's a secret. In the past few weeks, more libnut pundits are turning on her, which surprised me. When little chrissie matthews disses her, she's in trouble. Frankly, I think the entire country is sick and tired of the clintoons. Even the libnuts have had it with them. Her hubby is really shaking it up for her, to her eventual undoing. I don't think his bloated ego could handle being only the spouse.

All in all, the libnuts talk a lot about "equal rights" but they would not vote for a woman and they damn sure won't be voting for her. And neither will anyone else.


31 posted on 06/14/2006 1:24:49 AM PDT by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

Yes..makes me nauseous hearing that voice, and 9 out of 10 times she is reading whatever she says, gets to me about as bad as Gore's way of talking did. errrrrrrrrrrr


32 posted on 06/14/2006 2:10:41 AM PDT by tina07 (In Memory of my Father - WWII Army Air Force Veteran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
CORRECTION

Also, there's her "'effin Jew bastard" remark.......

33 posted on 06/14/2006 2:15:34 AM PDT by Las Vegas Dave ("Liberals out of power are comical-Liberals in power are dangerous!"-Rush Limbaugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

Did you ever hear or see Mikulski? Ugly to look at, obnoxious to listen to, but voted in every time.

The Democratic voters are morally bankrupt, ignorant, and very negative. They have been taught by the MSM, their school teachers, liberal judges, hollywood elites, and liberal advocacy groups to mistrust and scorn anything perceived as white, Christian, capitalist, male, heterosexual, 2nd Amendment, and Unabashedly pro-American.

Have you ever seen the hero of a tv movie as a white, Christian, male, heterosexual, conservative, or capitalist? No, on tv those types of people are always the villains, with poor powerless people being persecuted. Just look at the tv movies some time. The democratic voters are completely brainwashed.


The Democrats have gone along with preventing every type of reliable energy development, ie. oil drilling, coal mining, and nuclear reactor building.

There is nothing logical about their push for welfare, privileges in law based on race and sex, homosexual supremacy, criminalization of political opposition, destroying our borders, environmental extremism, big government solutions, retreat in time of war, etc.

Hillary can win. She is not the biggest danger, it is all her followers.




34 posted on 06/14/2006 2:32:43 AM PDT by 2ndClassCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

I just love it when FReepers start on Hildebeaste!


35 posted on 06/14/2006 2:54:47 AM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Until that witch is utterly defeated I'll fear her.
I agree with you . She is VERY dangerous and we slight her at our own peril.


36 posted on 06/14/2006 3:08:48 AM PDT by Tiberius109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

"ingratiating"

Not to nitpick, but that means `seeking to gain the favor of others'. Does Hillary's "grating" voice do that?


37 posted on 06/14/2006 3:12:09 AM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndClassCitizen

There is nothing logical about their push for welfare,
Yes there is , thats how they "buy" votes and voters,She will be nominated and that scares the hell out of me. It's naive to not think the Klintoons don't control the Dem party and have MASSIVE $$$ backing .


38 posted on 06/14/2006 3:23:06 AM PDT by Tiberius109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Achtung Mein Hillary!.....


39 posted on 06/14/2006 3:27:02 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

A little off-subject, but my 16 y.o. son is in Australia right now. On the 20, 21, and 22nd, he'll be in Melbourne.


40 posted on 06/14/2006 3:56:44 AM PDT by mozarky2 (Ya never stand so tall as when ya stoop to stomp a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson