Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctor, consumer group sue KFC
Mercury News ^ | June 13, 2006 | BRETT BARROUQUERE

Posted on 06/13/2006 5:51:16 PM PDT by FairOpinion

A doctor and a consumer group have sued KFC in an effort to stop the chicken chain from cooking with high-fat partially hydrogenated oil.

Dr. Arthur Hoyte, a retired physician from Rockville, Md., and the Center for Science in the Public Interest, want a judge to order Kentucky Fried Chicken to use other types of cooking oils or make sure customers know about trans fat content immediately before they make a purchase.

KFC spokeswoman Laurie Schalow called the lawsuit frivolous and said the company will fight it in court. Schalow said KFC is looking at using other types of oil for cooking, but it is committed to maintaining "KFC's unique taste and flavor."

KFC provides nutrition and fat information to consumers online and in restaurants, Schalow said.

"We have for a very long time," she said.

Michael Jacobsen, the executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said Louisville-based KFC parent company Yum Brands Inc. knows that other, healthier cooking products are available.

"KFC knows this, yet it recklessly puts its customers at risk of a Kentucky Fried Coronary," Jacobsen said.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foodnazis; foodpolice; frivoloussuits; health; kfc; lawsuit; libertarians; nannystate; peta; sendalllawyerstomars; tortreform; tortreformnow; transfats; willstopwithsmoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: lesser_satan

Thuh peeth clath? Is it called that cuth if I go I get a peeth of ath?


101 posted on 06/14/2006 10:10:08 AM PDT by Still Thinking (I love you, you love me, I'm a stone age wuhhhnuhhhbeeeee....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Yeth! Buth don'th go thu the Greenpeeth meething unleth you wanth a green peeth of ath!


102 posted on 06/14/2006 10:18:29 AM PDT by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Well...your analogy is not a good one. There is a difference between accidents and slowly killing yourself through lack of control and laziness. Gluttony is a sin ya know.
103 posted on 06/14/2006 10:58:46 AM PDT by Fawn (BUILD A LONG TALL WALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

So is health insurance.


104 posted on 06/14/2006 11:07:16 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Stayingawayfromthedarkside

You're right. Home cooked meals ARE cheaper, tastier and more nutritious than take out. I don't get why people don't cook much any more. Yeah, it's a little work, but worth the effort (mmmmm, leftovers!) I know people who eat fast food three or four times a week. I go maybe every two months. I chalk it up to laziness. A lot of Americans have become such spoiled and lazy gluttons. But it's their own choice to make.


105 posted on 06/14/2006 11:08:19 AM PDT by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
Well...your analogy is not a good one.

Nah, I think it's a good one.

There is a difference between accidents and slowly killing yourself through lack of control and laziness.

No one makes you participate in sports. No one makes you have kids. The only thing actually out of your control is infections, and even those are somewhat in your control.

Gluttony is a sin ya know.

So is selfishness and pride.

106 posted on 06/14/2006 11:18:00 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I don't think there will be a problem with fried chicken soon, avian flu will kill all the birds in the world.

Something to do with Global Warming.


107 posted on 06/14/2006 11:18:22 AM PDT by razorback-bert (Kooks For Kinky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

Little brother is just as bad....


108 posted on 06/14/2006 11:58:49 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I've got bad news for the guy. They just love fried chicken in china!!!


109 posted on 06/14/2006 12:03:14 PM PDT by Cheapskate (Guest tagline,doing jobs lazy american taglines won't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
How would moving to China or North Korea help? They force you to eat right and exercise?

Yes.

Did your parents ever force you to go outside and play or eat your vegetables?

Yes, but now that I'm all grown up, I don't want the government to start acting like surrogate parents to each of its subjects, er, citizens.

110 posted on 06/14/2006 12:05:38 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
.. I don't want the government to start acting like surrogate parents to each of its subjects, er, citizens.

Must get you a little upset seeing GWBush, Laura and Condi push a healthy lifestyle. How do you feel about them taking pizza and soda pop out of schools?

111 posted on 06/14/2006 1:28:20 PM PDT by Fawn (BUILD A LONG TALL WALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody; Fawn
I kind-of agree with both of you. It's unfair to allow those who accept higher levels of risk, whether through sporting activities or gluttony and laziness, to do so at others' expense. If one chooses to accept risk, one should bear the increased cost of that risk through higher premiums. For parents, this is indeed the case: people with children pay much higher premiums (in most cases).

On the other hand, in a free society, people have to right to assume personal risk, such as smoking, drinking, mountain-climbing, or eating lard. They also have the obligation to pay the consequences for assuming said risks.

112 posted on 06/14/2006 2:58:15 PM PDT by LibertarianSchmoe ("...yeah, but, that's different!" - mating call of the North American Ten-Toed Hypocrite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
How do you feel about them taking pizza and soda pop out of schools?

It's a massive nanny state intrusion that will be one of many things that will eventually lead to blood in the streets.

113 posted on 06/14/2006 3:03:57 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
I have a theory.

Maybe I was a little hard on you with my last post.

Don't worry, whenever you get to the section on the U.S. Constitution at your school (4th grade at a good private school - before the end of Jr. High at a decent public school - never at most public schools, in which case you will need to take it upon yourself to study it), you will understand.

114 posted on 06/14/2006 6:01:41 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

"Smokers warned fast food eaters. Fast food eaters didn't listen. You broke the dam"

Exactly. We knew this was coming.
Did they think it would stop at smokers?

Fools, fools, fools.


115 posted on 06/15/2006 8:54:44 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Gabz

"Will that open a precedent window to come after parents for having a stick of margarine on the table?"

It would seem so.
They say smokers are the equivalent to child-abusers, so following that lgic, you could come to the conclusion that anyone who allows their children to consume unhealthy foods would also be "abusing", or en-dangering them.

Welcome to 1984.


116 posted on 06/15/2006 8:59:16 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 383rr

lgic=logic
Duh!


117 posted on 06/15/2006 9:00:18 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Oh, brother.

I rarely eat KFC, or any other fast food for that matter. But when I do, it's because I have a wild, insane craving for something deliciously BAD for me. Original recipe chicken is just DRIPPING in bad stuff. Everybody knows that.


118 posted on 06/15/2006 9:00:51 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 383rr

I didn't understand the `1984' reference.


119 posted on 06/15/2006 10:06:43 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

It is a reference to the book 1984, where big brother is always watching you, and the thought police rule the land.


120 posted on 06/15/2006 10:22:02 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson