Freep This O'Reilly Poll: Do you approve of the personal attacks used in Ann Coulter's new book?

O'Reilly Factor ^ | Bill O'reilly

[adorno]

Freep thsi Oreilly Poll

Do you approve of the personal attacks used in Ann Coulter's new book?

Y, N

[stephenjohnbanker]

She is a SATIRIST, for God's sakes.........WTF????

[pookie18]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1645935/posts

[Bahbah]

What a slanted and distorted way to ask the question.

[adorno]

Oops! Sorry.

Just saw him announce the poll on the show. Didn't know it was already being Freeped..

My thread can be removed if mods so desire.

[popdonnelly]

Are they any worse than Bill's personal attacks?

[OldFriend]

Ann was too kind to those witches.

[keithtoo]

What is most amazing to me is that Ann is nothing if not smart, but she is also obvious as all get out. These are ALWAYS over-the-top comments - rooted in truth - to drive the Lib's nuts. And it ALWAYS works.

One of her favorite comments of mine about her easy manipulation of Lib's is this one:

"Liberals are like pets. You can make them do tricks!"

[spanalot]

typical oreilly shtick

[adorno]

These are ALWAYS over-the-top comments - rooted in truth - to drive the Lib's nuts. And it ALWAYS works.

O'reilly had Michelle Malkin and some other lady on. He asked them about whether they approved of the way Ann characterized the left. I was slightly disappointed with Michelle Malkin when she said thet she wouldn't have used the same harsh language (I'm paraphrasing).

[pookie18]

No...the more the merrier...just thought you'e enjoy reading the comments!

[ml/nj]

What personal attacks? Is pointing out that someone is wrong a personal attack?

ML/NJ

[i_dont_chat]

I voted.

Where can I view the results of the poll?

Thank you.

[rlmorel]

No kidding. Just what I thought.

That said, I have been involved in some very contentious threads over the past couple of days, and a lot of people take exception.

I do not, but I have come to the conclusion that her way of saying what is absolutely, positively true has given ammunition to her enemies, and not only allows them to avoid the real point of what she said, but also allows them to paint her as a lunatic kook fringe in a believable way to the general public.

I wish she had made her point with some minor alterations of her statement. I do not feel that way out of any deference to the "Jersey Girls" who have, in my opinion, surrendered their right to deference, pity and privacy with their active, over the top involvement in bitter partisan politics.

I simply feel that way because there are some who will not listen to her vitally important, truthful and valid point because of the way she said it.

[adorno]

What personal attacks? Is pointing out that someone is wrong a personal attack?

When liberals are confronted with the cold hard facts and they can't find the words or means to dispute them, then it must really be hurtfull to them.

[Nuc1]

"Do you approve of the personal attacks used in Ann Coulter's new book?"

Bill is a Harvard post grad. He is challenged on a number of fronts, why do you think he phrased the question in this way? Because Ann wins every argument she has with him and she scratched him up pretty good last week. He is petulant. You go girl!!!

[Loyal Buckeye]

Larry King and Charlie Rangel are going to figure things out tonight. I'm sure Charlie will not make any personal attacks on Ann.

[reaganandme]

I was slightly disappointed with Michelle Malkin when she said thet she wouldn't have used the same harsh language (I'm paraphrasing).

I wouldn't have used that language either. It was over the top and inappropriate.

[Old Professer]

I sent an e-mail and told them I was too busy beating my wife and would have to get back to them later.

[RGSpincich]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1647802/posts

I also approve of the personal attacks on the Jersey Cows made by a fellow 9/11 family member.