Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wedding pics for the brides who don't blush
The Sunday Times ^ | June 11, 2006 | John Harlow

Posted on 06/11/2006 3:14:42 AM PDT by MadIvan

WEDDING photography, once a restrained art, is becoming a risqué business. A growing number of American brides are marking their big day by commissioning portraits of themselves in raunchy poses and lingerie, writes John Harlow.

This month, when a quarter of America’s annual 2m weddings take place, brides’ parents are paying up to £6,000 for an “action photographer”, whose brief is to capture their daughter “accidentally” exposing sexy garters or her knickers.

The American wedding is changing fast. Traditionalists have already lamented a switch to homemade vows, such as “to stay together so long as we make each other laugh”, and a large-scale abandonment of white since Sarah Jessica Parker, the star of Sex and the City, got married in black.

The paparazzi-style wedding photographs are the latest shock to the establishment, although some clerics are going along with it.

Frank Ray, a Baptist minister in Tennessee, was the target of outrage when his bride published nuptial snaps of herself and her maids of honour dressed in plunging black leather bustiers on the internet. “It was fabulous fun, and something we shall always remember,” said the 58-year-old minister.

Wedding photographers say such pictures are becoming the rage across all sections of US society. Steven Gross, a Chicago photographer, said he had taken nearly 8,000 shots at a recent £100,000 wedding, but the most prominent one in the album was a close-up of bridal cleavage.

“Brides, and sometimes the groom, want to show off their gym-fit bodies,” said a spokesman for Equinox, a gym chain that offers a “wedding boot camp”.

Richard Albans, a photographer in Los Angeles, turned to wedding work after being punched by a Hollywood bodyguard.

“But I did not realise what today’s bride really wants: a true evocation of that moment when she was at her most sexually and socially powerful,” he said.

“She wants to remind her spouse why he married her. It was not just because she looked radiant in white — underneath she was downright dirty and dangerous in a black garter or red-sequinned bra.

“It’s more Las Vegas showgirl than blushing bride.”

One of his clients, who is marrying later this year, said she was planning on opening the doors to her bridal boudoir for three days before the main event. “I want a big book of photographs, showing everything from me flashing my boobs as I get dressed to my boyfriend having his chest waxed,” she said.

“It’s about intimacy, the real story, as well as silly fun.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: photos; risque; wedding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last
To: cdbear

ping


121 posted on 06/11/2006 7:01:27 PM PDT by NerdDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

Ping


122 posted on 06/11/2006 7:04:19 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sully777

The photo you posted is a gorgeous couple. I checked the properties of the photo to see if it would tell me who they were. I didn't learn who they were but I did find an interesting contradiction. The photo comes from a place called Jewels by Jessica but there are absolutely no jewels visible in the photo.

That is, except for the outline of the stiff nipples that are plainly visible. Apologies to you or anyone else on the forum to whom these folks may be kin, but the "pointer sisters" clearly create another contradiction -- this one with the concept of the white dress.

But still, they are a very attractive couple.


123 posted on 06/11/2006 7:33:12 PM PDT by NerdDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: NerdDad
The photo you posted is a gorgeous couple

There is a guy in the photo???

All seriousness aside, the "jewelry" is the "wrist ornament" which the woman in the picture seems to prefer wearing on her upper arm.

It seems this is the way the artist sees them being worn:

I don't think this is wedding dress, I think it is a honeymoon dress.



Oh, there's the guy!

124 posted on 06/11/2006 8:41:56 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
You sir have an exceptional eye; great work/beautiful photos. As a former wedding/portrait photographer I know how much work goes into the quality of your photos.

Thanks for providing proof that women can be totally alluring without being naked ;o)

125 posted on 06/11/2006 8:54:58 PM PDT by Jmouse007 (Convert, Slavery or Death = "Islam the Religion of Peace tm" "It's time to play Cowboys and Muslims")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

Thanks, I'm flattered, especially coming from someone who's done weddings.


126 posted on 06/11/2006 10:04:20 PM PDT by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Stop that, stop that, it's silly!

“It’s more Las Vegas showgirl than blushing bride.”

Look at it this way -- she'll have something to look back on in her old age.


127 posted on 06/11/2006 11:15:26 PM PDT by Watery Tart (We apologise for the fault in the taglines. Those responsible have been sacked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia; sully777; The_Victor; uglybiker; King Prout
*sigh*

What this thread lacks is nice white trash engagement photos, both "casual" and "posed"


128 posted on 06/11/2006 11:38:04 PM PDT by Watery Tart (We apologise for the fault in the taglines. Those responsible have been sacked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
For discussion purposes.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

And there is no competition for most extreme wedding video.
Woofing Wedding Video

Claim: Friends gathered to view the video record of a newly-married couple's special day were instead treated to a literal episode of I Love Lassie.

Status: True. http://www.snopes.com/risque/animals/woofing.asp

129 posted on 06/11/2006 11:52:06 PM PDT by gondramB (We may have done a lill' bit of fightin amongst ourselves but you outside people best leave us alone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

It ended badly, to say the least......


130 posted on 06/12/2006 8:03:17 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Why do the man and boy to the left of this photo have their hands in their pockets. I don't get it?
131 posted on 06/12/2006 8:05:13 AM PDT by Candor7 ((Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

Oh my!


132 posted on 06/12/2006 9:20:00 PM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Why do the man and boy to the left of this photo have their hands in their pockets. I don't get it?

Because the bouquet toss is for the girls only. The guys are just standing around watching.

133 posted on 06/13/2006 8:36:05 AM PDT by Steve0113 (Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. -A.L.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson