Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"The willingness of today's National Guardsmen to continue in combat is courageous and admirable, but cannot be expected to last indefinitely, and the political cost of returning to the draft system would be incalculable."

The MSM and Roger Ebert, lefty and notorious gay-friendly movie reviewer continue to hype anything anti-war or anti-military.

I will be skipping this pile of horse dung, so-called film.

1 posted on 06/10/2006 11:26:51 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: KeyLargo

What a wet dream. Any soldier who admired Jane Fonda was a traitor, just like that POS Kerry. they deserved to be lined up and shot.


2 posted on 06/10/2006 11:30:49 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

The article is correct that American military morale declined dramatically towards the end of the war.

Among other things, who wants to be the last soldier to die in a lost war?

There was also a huge drug problem in the military during this period.


3 posted on 06/10/2006 11:33:15 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

I remember that one of the big 3 abcnbccbs caught an army patrol, on film, in VietNam, near the end, refusing to go down a path. the MSM was calling it mutiny.


4 posted on 06/10/2006 11:34:34 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
Cancerbutt has gone off the deep end. That's all there is to it.

He's stopped reviewing movies and devolved into a mere huckster; and like so many other Libs lately, he is willfully squandering what little good will he had built up over the years.

I wonder how his sponsors will feel about it.

5 posted on 06/10/2006 11:36:57 AM PDT by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

Are any of these troops at the Fonda gatherings like the 'troops' that John Kerry brought along on his anti-war whistle stops?


6 posted on 06/10/2006 11:37:07 AM PDT by ChuckShick (He's clerking for me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

Ask Roger Fatbert why are enlistment levels surpassing expectations. I stopped reading his reviews. He was at U of Va
hosting a film series. I remeber him saying that european voters were much more sophisticated than americans. After that I avoided his reviews. It was at that time when Siskel was ill
and Michael Medeved appeared on Chicago radio... a breath of fresh air.

I found Michael Medeved's reviews to be more insightful and
agreeable.


7 posted on 06/10/2006 11:38:13 AM PDT by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

this guy's supposed to be a film critic? yet he doesn't know that the line concerning civilians spitting on soldiers is to be found near the end of "First Blood" - the FIRST Rambo movie (the actual title of the second movie is "Rambo: First Blood PART TWO")?

As this guy doesn't even know the subject of his own field of specialty, why the hell should anyone heed his other assertions of "fact"?

For the record, the spitting-on-soldiers story was well established in my youth in the 1970's, to the point that I recall "sensitive" hippie types BRAGGING that they had DONE this.


8 posted on 06/10/2006 11:39:45 AM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
"After the turning point of the Tet offensive in 1968"

I was there for the Tet offensive and witnessed what a disaster it was for the North -- as verified after the war by Gen. Giap. Of course, the traitorous Cronkite reported it all as a major U.S. loss and, effectively, and simultaneously, started the serious growth of the American anti-war movement and convinced the North, which was very close to suing for peace before the Cronkite reports, that they could, in fact, win with the help of America's "enemies from within." (again verified by their Gen. Giap)

The American left can and will happily lead us to defeat at every opportunity. They hate this country and all it stands for every bit as much as do the Islamo-fascists.
9 posted on 06/10/2006 11:40:10 AM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

"The Swift Boat Veterans incredibly tried to deny John Kerry's patriotism."

Ebert: liberal leftist.

Your honor, I rest my case.


10 posted on 06/10/2006 11:42:36 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

Rog, your side won that war. Get over it.


11 posted on 06/10/2006 11:43:08 AM PDT by RichInOC (Jane Fonda likes it long and hard. Just ask the Vietnamese Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

"The Swift Boat Veterans incredibly tried to deny John Kerry's patriotism."
Typical Lefty misrepresentation. The SBV rightfully questioned his veracity about his own conduct, and his accusations against US troops. And there wasn't anything "incredible" in doing so.


12 posted on 06/10/2006 11:43:46 AM PDT by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
"The willingness of today's National Guardsmen to continue in combat is courageous and admirable, but cannot be expected to last indefinitely, and the political cost of returning to the draft system would be incalculable."

That's not an untrue statement, though. And the long-term effects on recruitment are evident, as many people who would have signed up as only a Home Guard (without overseas deployment except following military attack by another nation) no longer have a place to enlist.

If we are going to be an active participant in overseas nation-building/interventionism, then we need a larger active-duty regular military, not the current alignment of National Guardsmen for offensive combat. Besides, the current regulations have limits on redeployment of Guardsmen, such that we are having to dig deeply into inactive reservists, like the 70-year-old sent to Afghanistan in 2004.

14 posted on 06/10/2006 11:47:48 AM PDT by Gondring (If "Conservatives" now wants to "conserve" our Constitution away, then I must be a Preservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

He gave the Gore movie 4 stars. Nuff said.


15 posted on 06/10/2006 11:47:56 AM PDT by altura (Bushbot No. 1 - get in line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo; All
“Is chow allowed in the barracks, Private Ebert?”

“Sir! No Sir!”

“Are you allowed to eat jelly doughnuts, Private Ebert?”

“Sir! No Sir!”

“And why not, Private Ebert?”

“Sir, because I’m too heavy, Sir.”

“Because you are a disgusting fatbody, Private Ebert!”

17 posted on 06/10/2006 12:02:07 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
The willingness of today's National Guardsmen to continue in combat is courageous and admirable, but cannot be expected to last indefinitely

Not if Fatso has anything to say about it.

19 posted on 06/10/2006 12:06:35 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
featuring Edward Asner, Jane Fonda, Donald Sutherland

Boy, there's three winners. I can't wait to see that film.

22 posted on 06/10/2006 12:12:08 PM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
Hollywood and the MSM bring us another "unbiased" and "factual" documentary like Fahrenheit 911? Gee - I'm surprised!

I'll go see this right after I watch TransAmerica, Syriana and Broke Back Mountain, all movies critics rave over.
25 posted on 06/10/2006 12:17:47 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
It's also said there were a few Air Force B-52 crews that refused to bomb North Vietnam.

Analyzed by Marshall Michel in his book The Eleven Days of Christmas, and proven not true. There were a few guys who went DNIF for questionable reasons, but they were fewer in number or percentage of aircrew that did so during the great bomber slaughter over Germany in 1943.

And in San Diego, sailors on an aircraft carrier tried to promote a local vote on whether their ship should be allowed to sail for Vietnam.

I was in San Diego for that: they were confused young men with some disciplinary action pending against them who got played for idiots by the local antiwar activists.

28 posted on 06/10/2006 12:21:25 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
It's also said there were a few Air Force B-52 crews that refused to bomb North Vietnam.

I think the situation was that they flew the same flight plan at the same time every night and the North Vietnamese were shooting down more and more planes. They objected to not having any flexibility. The pilots won and no missions were canceled... from what I have read.

32 posted on 06/10/2006 12:31:09 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

Roger Ebert eats ----.


40 posted on 06/10/2006 1:53:45 PM PDT by MrCruncher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson