Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canon to stop making single-lens camera
AP (via Yahoo) ^ | 25 May 06

Posted on 05/25/2006 10:08:01 AM PDT by Drew68

Canon to stop making single-lens camera

TOKYO - Japan's top camera maker, Canon Inc., will stop developing new single-lens reflex film cameras as more people abandon film for digital, company officials said Thursday.

The Tokyo-based Canon's move followed a similar move by its closest Japanese rival, Nikon Corp., which announced earlier this year it would stop making seven of its nine film cameras and concentrate on digital models.

Canon will continue making film cameras already on the market as long as their demand remains. Whether to withdraw from the film camera business will be "decided appropriately by judging the market situation," said Canon spokesman Hiroshi Yoshinaga.

Japanese camera makers sold a combined total 64.77 million digital cameras last year globally, compared with 5.38 million film cameras, according to industry figures. Yoshinaga said his company could not disclose the number of cameras sold.

Meanwhile, Tsuneji Uchida, president of Canon, told reporters that demand for film cameras will be limited to "special needs" like camera buffs, Kyodo News agency said.

In January, Konica Minolta Holdings Inc., another Japanese optical manufacturer, said it was quitting the camera business altogether — digital and film — and selling its digital assets to rival Sony Corp.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 35mmcameras; cameras; canon; digitalcameras; kodak; photography
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
Can't blame them. I know with absolute certainty that I will never own anything but a digital camera again. Mine is a 5.5 megapixel model that is two years old. It is outdated by know but it still takes photos that print out just as perfect (to my eyes) as a film camera --and I even use the low resolution settings.
1 posted on 05/25/2006 10:08:03 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Canon makes fine digital cameras too. Their revenues won't be hurting. Ditto for Kodak. I like my Sony F717. It will be my camera of choice for many years.
2 posted on 05/25/2006 10:10:46 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I think I'll go shoot some Velvia.

3 posted on 05/25/2006 10:11:47 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Why did Allah create free will and then demand submission? Wouldn't robots have been easier?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Mine is a 5.5 megapixel model that is two years old. It is outdated by know

Hey, I'm still schleppin' along with this mutt (2.3 MP), complete with duct tape holding the memory card door shut.

4 posted on 05/25/2006 10:12:49 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
My Dad worked for 37 years at Polaroid.In the last few years of his life,he was heartbroken to see what was happening to Polaroid...and Kodak.I often think that his attitde was similar to the one that a guy who helped design and/or build the WTC might have had on 9/11.
5 posted on 05/25/2006 10:14:09 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Canon will continue making film cameras already on the market as long as their demand remains.

The title and article don't match.

6 posted on 05/25/2006 10:15:42 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I've got a Vivitar 8.1 megapixel digital camera myself. Very easy to use and takes fantastic pictures. Not to mention I can upload the pictures on-line to Walgreens and pick them up later the same day.


7 posted on 05/25/2006 10:15:55 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Support American sovereignty - boycott employers of illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Hey, I'm still schleppin' along with this mutt (2.3 MP), complete with duct tape holding the memory card door shut.

That is still really all you need for personal photography. Mine will shoot photos in .tif format but I've never once shot a photo with that much resolution. For obvious reasons, I use lower resoultion so that I can send my photos via email. When I print them out on paper, they look just fine.

I haven't even checked to see what resolution cameras today are capable of shooting.

8 posted on 05/25/2006 10:17:08 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I still take great shots with my CANON AE-1 Program.

I like to shoot pix of high speed objects, like race cars and airplanes. Digital cameras haven't met my needs yet in the same price range.

But, casual pix are all digital-- a old Kodak point and shoot, and a Fujifilm S5200 5.5MP SLR. 0.01 shutter lag is pretty good.


9 posted on 05/25/2006 10:17:31 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

I bought the Canon 20 D for Christmas. Got the 1.4 lens. My old Pentax ME is officially retired.


10 posted on 05/25/2006 10:18:53 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Well, a digital back [if made modular] could be always attached to an SLR instead of the film back, like they could do with Hasselblads. Lens, viewfinder with exposure metering and the shutter are the same anyway.


11 posted on 05/25/2006 10:18:56 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Interesting how many technologies that dominated the 20th century are dying or have died in front of our eyes: film photography, analog audio recordings, land-line telephones. Lots of changes, mostly for the good.


12 posted on 05/25/2006 10:19:22 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
Not to mention I can upload the pictures on-line to Walgreens and pick them up later the same day.

I spent under $80 on an HP Deskjet 5440 and I use their software to edit my photos. I used to use yahoo to print my digital pictures and mail them back to me. I had pretty good results from them. Now I just do it myself (admittedly, it is a little more labor-intensive but the results are just the same).

13 posted on 05/25/2006 10:20:27 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
My Dad worked for 37 years at Polaroid.In the last few years of his life,he was heartbroken to see what was happening to Polaroid...and Kodak.I often think that his attitde was similar to the one that a guy who helped design and/or build the WTC might have had on 9/11.

With all due respect to your father, I don't think the two emotions would be that similar.

His attitude would be more similar to what I experienced when the A-12 and F-23 programs were canceled at McDonnell Douglas.

Great products that will never be used again.

14 posted on 05/25/2006 10:20:34 AM PDT by Dr._Joseph_Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I can recall saying this would happen several years ago and being shouted down. At the time I said it a six megapixel camera seemed like a dream. Now I would say that consumer grade cmeras will reach 20 megapixels by the end of the decade.

Semi-pro cameras like the Rebel will have, by the end of the decade, more resolution and more exposure lattitude than Kodachrome, and good noise specs at ISO 1600.

There are theoretical cameras that can be focused after the exposure, a kind of hologram. The crystal ball is cloudy five years from now. But film will disappear from consumer channels.


15 posted on 05/25/2006 10:22:08 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Digital cameras are fine for general usage, but I haven't seen a reasonable price one which can do 1/1000 second or better stop action photography. A cheap 35mm camera just required a roll of high speed film to handle that (at the price of some extra film grain). I also haven't been all that happy with digital's on low light, long exposure shots.

I would love to see a high speed 5+ MPix SLR digital camera for less than $500 so I can change lenses. I also want a pony. :-)

16 posted on 05/25/2006 10:22:42 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Never ask a Kennedy if he'll have another drink. It's nobody's business how much he's had already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
I be schleppin' along wid my Olympus 3.0 and it do just fine.

It runs on bat trees so I not be tied to a dock when I want to cruise.

17 posted on 05/25/2006 10:23:14 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

My wife's brother lives in Rochester, NY, hometown to Kodak. The HQ's a ghostown. Prices will drop, new features will emerge, but silver film is going the way of the buggy whip and lead type.


18 posted on 05/25/2006 10:24:54 AM PDT by 50sDad (ST3d: Real Star Trek 3d Chess: http://my.ohio.voyager.net/~abartmes/tactical.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

The buggy whip is making a comeback.


19 posted on 05/25/2006 10:26:29 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
Interesting how many technologies that dominated the 20th century are dying or have died in front of our eyes: film photography, analog audio recordings, land-line telephones. Lots of changes, mostly for the good.

And it is happening so fast! The last time I had a land-line telephone was specifically so that I could use dial-up internet service. Now I don't even have that. I just can't foresee a need for a land-line phone anymore.

AS far as the other technologies you mentioned, I think of the music and movie industries. People can already record studio quality music in their bedrooms with inexpensive software and recording equipment. Soon, people will be making studio-quality, feature-length films complete with high-tech special effects and downloading them on the internet for people to burn onto a dvd.

The entertainment industry will need to be radically overhauled to deal with these new challenges to their hegemony.

20 posted on 05/25/2006 10:26:58 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson