Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dull Hillary stumbles and the memory of Bill lingers on
The Daily Telegraph ^ | May 24, 2006 | Francis Harris

Posted on 05/24/2006 12:24:18 AM PDT by MadIvan

Hillary Clinton may be the Democratic front-runner for the presidency but she seems to have a lot to learn about campaigning for the White House.

In a weighty speech to journalists at the National Press Club in Washington yesterday, the senator squandered an opportunity to shine before a critically important audience - the journalists who will present her to the public if, as expected, she declares her candidacy for the 2008 nomination.

It began well enough. Resplendent in a lemon yellow two-piece and expensively bejewelled, her star power was plain the moment she entered the room. Everywhere, necks craned for a sight of the immaculately coiffured New York senator.

But then she lost it. The half-hour speech was achingly dull, a meandering lecture on energy policy which left the audience stifling yawns.

It was hard not to recall the charisma of her husband, Bill, the former president, and Mrs Clinton seemed to sense things had not gone well.

As she droned towards the finish, she looked out at a silent, glassy-eyed audience and acknowledged that her speech was a little unusual. "I know this is probably more wonkish than many of you had anticipated," she said, moments after offering her plans for something called geologic carbon sequestration. "But I feel very strongly about it."

There was a murmur of laughter but only minutes earlier some of those at the breakfast meeting appeared to have slumped into unconsciousness.

Others stifled yawns, held their chins in their hands or stared at the carpet or ceiling. By the time two women peace protesters made their predictable intervention on Iraq (and were predictably carried out by Mrs Clinton's burly secret servicemen) the assembled journalists had largely stopped listening.

The melee did at least open the way for questions. Mrs Clinton was asked: "You're here to talk about energy, but most people are here because they think you will run for president." She affected surprise before offering a cautious and well-rehearsed answer, claiming that she didn't think about such things.

However preposterous her response (she has raised more than £10 million for a senate re-election battle which will cost far less), there was a respectful silence. But everyone laughed when she was asked what she would like to be remembered for if her career ended now. "I don't want it to end now," she said.

That sort of ambiguity feeds America's fascination with Mrs Clinton.

Yesterday a 2,000-word examination of the Clinton marriage in the New York Times, produced no firm conclusion other than Mr Clinton remained by far the better public performer while she was "starchy". Her performance yesterday did nothing to overturn that notion.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: New York
KEYWORDS: boredom; hillary; politics; us; weirdbill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last
To: MadIvan

As she droned towards the finish, she looked out at a silent, glassy-eyed audience and acknowledged that her speech was a little unusual. "I know this is probably more wonkish than many of you had anticipated," she said, moments after offering her plans for something called geologic carbon sequestration. "But I feel very strongly about it."

LOL


81 posted on 05/25/2006 10:24:19 AM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

82 posted on 05/25/2006 2:22:18 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Hillary had actually auditioned for that part, but was beat out at the last second by the lovely Linda Blair. Here's her test shot...


83 posted on 05/25/2006 2:54:42 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Support American sovereignty - boycott employers of illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
There is no way someone who polarizes the electorate as much as she does will ever be elected to the nation's highest office. No way.

The bent one dies tragically and his grieving widow runs for President.

84 posted on 05/26/2006 7:08:57 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Back in '93, I was at a health care meeting in Washington (about 250 people) and Hillary came in and spoke to us for about 45 minutes. She had no notes and just looked us all in the eye. I detested her then as I do now, but I was impressed with the linearity of her reasoning and the fact that she seemed to believe in what she was saying. Her delivery was dull, but it was not as bad as what this report suggests.

Basically, she's just passable when speaking about something she believes in and fails miserably when she spouts her nonsense.

85 posted on 05/26/2006 7:18:47 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson