Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dull Hillary stumbles and the memory of Bill lingers on
The Daily Telegraph ^ | May 24, 2006 | Francis Harris

Posted on 05/24/2006 12:24:18 AM PDT by MadIvan

Hillary Clinton may be the Democratic front-runner for the presidency but she seems to have a lot to learn about campaigning for the White House.

In a weighty speech to journalists at the National Press Club in Washington yesterday, the senator squandered an opportunity to shine before a critically important audience - the journalists who will present her to the public if, as expected, she declares her candidacy for the 2008 nomination.

It began well enough. Resplendent in a lemon yellow two-piece and expensively bejewelled, her star power was plain the moment she entered the room. Everywhere, necks craned for a sight of the immaculately coiffured New York senator.

But then she lost it. The half-hour speech was achingly dull, a meandering lecture on energy policy which left the audience stifling yawns.

It was hard not to recall the charisma of her husband, Bill, the former president, and Mrs Clinton seemed to sense things had not gone well.

As she droned towards the finish, she looked out at a silent, glassy-eyed audience and acknowledged that her speech was a little unusual. "I know this is probably more wonkish than many of you had anticipated," she said, moments after offering her plans for something called geologic carbon sequestration. "But I feel very strongly about it."

There was a murmur of laughter but only minutes earlier some of those at the breakfast meeting appeared to have slumped into unconsciousness.

Others stifled yawns, held their chins in their hands or stared at the carpet or ceiling. By the time two women peace protesters made their predictable intervention on Iraq (and were predictably carried out by Mrs Clinton's burly secret servicemen) the assembled journalists had largely stopped listening.

The melee did at least open the way for questions. Mrs Clinton was asked: "You're here to talk about energy, but most people are here because they think you will run for president." She affected surprise before offering a cautious and well-rehearsed answer, claiming that she didn't think about such things.

However preposterous her response (she has raised more than £10 million for a senate re-election battle which will cost far less), there was a respectful silence. But everyone laughed when she was asked what she would like to be remembered for if her career ended now. "I don't want it to end now," she said.

That sort of ambiguity feeds America's fascination with Mrs Clinton.

Yesterday a 2,000-word examination of the Clinton marriage in the New York Times, produced no firm conclusion other than Mr Clinton remained by far the better public performer while she was "starchy". Her performance yesterday did nothing to overturn that notion.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: New York
KEYWORDS: boredom; hillary; politics; us; weirdbill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
Excellent. This may encourage Gore to make a run for it, and we will have a Democrat civil war.

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 05/24/2006 12:24:18 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Texican; Watery Tart; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; pax_et_bonum; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 05/24/2006 12:24:52 AM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

"...the senator squandered an opportunity to shine before a critically important audience..." Excuse me if I chuckle at the idea they are "critical" of Hillary in any way.


3 posted on 05/24/2006 12:34:44 AM PDT by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
.... who will present her to the public if, as expected, she declares her candidacy for the 2008 nomination.

Which I predict she will declare on 6/6/06.

4 posted on 05/24/2006 12:38:47 AM PDT by Screamname (By God, pray for me, someone help me please! Hillary is my Senator! HELP MEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

should be "who will represent her to the public.."


5 posted on 05/24/2006 12:56:07 AM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I flipped into C-Span just as the event was ending and saw Hillary wearing that "lemon yellow" silk pantsuit. I swear, an exact replica of what she wore standing behind Clinton when he did his finger wagging, "I did not have sex with that woman...Ms Lewinsky" declaration.

She often wears pastel colored, silk pants suits reminiscent of what she sported as First Lady. Turquoise, peach, but you think she'd avoid that yellow one.




6 posted on 05/24/2006 1:05:48 AM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Screamname
Mrs. Clinton will not run. She lives by the polls, and if they are the same as today, she will stay in her present position.
7 posted on 05/24/2006 1:16:10 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"That sort of ambiguity feeds America's fascination with Mrs Clinton."

****

"America's fascination with Mrs Clinton" --- "fascination"? --- where was the BARF ALERT?

;-)

8 posted on 05/24/2006 1:21:35 AM PDT by beyond the sea ("If you see strange men lurking about in groups of three - especially in North Carolina, RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
...the journalists who will present her to the public if, as expected, she declares her candidacy for the 2008 nomination...

Bunk. The leftwingnut "journalists" (aka propaganda practitioners) and the lunatic base will come out in full force for Hitlery.

Oh, they might stage some very public "spats" or critiques of Clinton (like the "marriage" story on the front of the NY Slimes earlier this week) but make no mistake...the left's utter contempt for traditional values and conservatism, for strength in foreign policy and freedom from government confiscation of your labor will drive them to promote the junior senator from New York to the Oval Office.

I don't think they'll succeed--but they will definitely try.

9 posted on 05/24/2006 2:00:14 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Looks like the circus may come to town. As I recall Algore and Hitlary don't particularly like each other. Can we use the word hate in the same sentence with them? LOL. Amen.
10 posted on 05/24/2006 2:38:19 AM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
As she droned towards the finish, she looked out at a silent, glassy-eyed audience and acknowledged that her speech was a little unusual. "I know this is probably more wonkish than many of you had anticipated," she said, moments after offering her plans for something called geologic carbon sequestration. "But I feel very strongly about it."

This report is merely a precursor of what we can expect if Hillary when annouces she is running for the presidency. The report is mildly critical of her delivery of the speech, but, by and large, is laudatory of Hillary.

I boldfaced "wonkish" in the cited passage because I think Hillary appears to be laying the groundwork and signaling the media that she is indeed the "smartest woman" in the universe. This ploy is exactly what has transpired in too many elections in the past. The only Republican candidate that I can recall as being considered reasonably bright by the media is Richard Nixon. On the other hand, the media has made a list of inellectual giants out of the likes of Adlai Stevenson, Jimmy Carter, Michael Dukakis, Bill Clinton, Al Gore and John Kerry.

11 posted on 05/24/2006 3:11:17 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gakrak
As I recall Algore and Hitlary don't particularly like each other

Ya think Dodd is going to slide through while these two phonies fight each other to death?

12 posted on 05/24/2006 3:12:03 AM PDT by leadhead (It’s a duty and a responsibility to defeat them. But it's also a pleasure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
By the time two women peace protesters made their predictable intervention on Iraq (and were predictably carried out by Mrs Clinton's burly secret servicemen) the assembled journalists had largely stopped listening.

Sheesh. When some wacko protester confronts Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, it is front page news.

Numerous front page stories about Rumsfeld's protester

Hillary's boring speech gets protested, and the reporters still yawn and hardly bothered to tell us.

13 posted on 05/24/2006 3:16:27 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
If you remember, Bubba got his "serious" ticket punched at the 1988 Democrat National Convention. His achingly long speech was so dull, some delegates have still not woken up, 18 years later. From that day on, he was labeled as a "serious thinker" and "policy wonk". After that he could parade down Main Street in a clown costume with his penis hanging out and the MSM would still intone seriously about his "intellectual credentials".

I submit to you that Hillary! is pulling the same move here. This speech was aimed at the Press Corps, and meant to convince them that she was a serious thinker about policy. It accomplished that mission. From now on, whenever she makes a really stupid statement (which she does, on average, every 18 minutes) the MSM will scratch it's collective head and wonder how such an intelligent woman could say such idiotic things.

The Clintons have only one playbook, and they keep running the same plays over and over again. Eventually the Cowboys figured out how to stop the Redskin's Counter Trey. We 'Pubbies have to learn how to stop these plays.

Look for Hillary! to stage her own "Sistah Souljah" moment sometime within the next two months.

14 posted on 05/24/2006 3:21:21 AM PDT by jebeier (AKA gridlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

What's worse is this is written in a suposedly right wing paper.

They should be ripping into her, instead of giving her a pass.


15 posted on 05/24/2006 3:46:20 AM PDT by crazycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

One of the big media dudes said that if Hillary WAS SMART, she'd just stay in the Senate for 20 years. Sounded like a BIG "No Confidence" in winning the Presidency.


16 posted on 05/24/2006 4:08:51 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
I certainly do not think that Mrs. Clinton is the smartest woman in the World, but she certainly is political savvy!!
17 posted on 05/24/2006 4:26:34 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
should be "who will represent her to the public.."

I marvel at peoples' politeness. Being a classless clod, I would have said,

"who will pimp her to the public.."

18 posted on 05/24/2006 4:31:44 AM PDT by Gorzaloon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robwin

But, but, but, ...

This is the unbiased, CRITICAL national press corpse. (Er, corps.)


19 posted on 05/24/2006 4:31:59 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jebeier
Hillary doesn't know sh** about her subject. She got on the ethanol wagon as if she has invented it. It's been around for years just like wind and solar power. It's getting people like the Kennedy's to permit such uses.

Our "snob" town didn't want a windmill in their back yard either. "Unsightly" they said.

We have a windmill down the road a bit. Very cool and I have yet to see a bird be attacked by the windmill. I have seen a robin deadbreast laid out under my patio door!!

20 posted on 05/24/2006 4:33:57 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson