1 posted on
05/22/2006 12:55:40 AM PDT by
SUSSA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: SUSSA
to create by 2010 a redefinition of boundaries such that the primary immigration control will be around the three countries of the North American Union, not between the three countries. We have argued that a likely reason President Bush has not secured our border with Mexico is that the administration is pushing for the establishment of the North American Union.
Was that why I'll need a passport to visit Canada starting in a few years?
2 posted on
05/22/2006 1:04:55 AM PDT by
RWR8189
(George Allen for President)
To: Grampa Dave; Mo1; Peach; sinkspur; McGavin999; Texasforever; CWOJackson; BigSkyFreeper; ...
4 posted on
05/22/2006 1:07:17 AM PDT by
onyx
(Deport the trolls --- send them back to DU)
To: SUSSA
The American people will not allow the loss of the American dollars.
Any politician wanting to step forward to put their political necks on the chopping block should come forward on this.
6 posted on
05/22/2006 1:08:50 AM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: SUSSA
Not while I'm still sucking in air ...
8 posted on
05/22/2006 1:11:27 AM PDT by
tx_eggman
(Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
To: SUSSA
This would be politically impossible in all three countries. Especially Canada.
9 posted on
05/22/2006 1:12:17 AM PDT by
Energy Alley
("War on Christians" = just another professional victim group.)
To: SUSSA
Holy moly! Everything I can think of to say in respone to this is cause to get me banned. So I will only say that I am not pleased that the POTUS would participate.
15 posted on
05/22/2006 1:16:43 AM PDT by
LK44-40
To: SUSSA
oh please....we don't need no Euro style bs round here....
To: SUSSA
The idea to form the North American Union as a super-NAFTA knitting together Canada, the United States and Mexico into a super-regional political and economic entity
Should read, "The idea to create the North American Union as a super-NAFTA having Canada and Mexico drag off of the coat tails of The United States to form into a super-regional political and economic entity---"
18 posted on
05/22/2006 1:17:42 AM PDT by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: SUSSA
We will establish a common approach to security to protect North America from external threats, prevent and respond to threats within North America, and further streamline the secure and efficient movement of legitimate, low-risk traffic across our borders. Tell me exactly what advantage Meico and Canada would give the US in protecting North America. We have all the fire power needed, thank you.
21 posted on
05/22/2006 1:22:11 AM PDT by
Ruth A.
(we might as well fight in the first ditch as the last)
To: SUSSA
Why?
Canada's GDP is less than 1/12 that of the US. Mexico is similar.
In 5 years we will likely have grown economically as much as Canada and Mexico combined would add...
And I don't see any upside to having our currency tied to Canada's much less Mexico's.
22 posted on
05/22/2006 1:22:16 AM PDT by
DB
(©)
To: SUSSA
To: SUSSA
Heavens, Having insomnia this past week has least been instructive. I think the folks that push this illegal issue must work in shifts and stuff like this is marketed to engage the Art Bell crowd that is on the computer at this time.
Really does anyone actually believe this. The Amero? Human events is getting more wacky everyday
32 posted on
05/22/2006 1:35:55 AM PDT by
catholicfreeper
(White Chocalate is Nagin liciouses Geaux Nagin)
To: SUSSA
[Robert]
Pastor was a vice chairman of the CFR task force that produced the report Building a North American Union.Pastor also proposed the creation of a Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment with the view that a permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law. The intent is for this North American Union Tribunal would have supremacy over the U.S. Supreme Court on issues affecting the North American Union, to prevent U.S. power from irritating and retarding the progress of uniting Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. into a new 21st century super-regional governing body.
OK folks, can you say "New World Order" yet?
Remember whose daddy said it first!
If this "Tribunal" has authority over the USSC, just where do you think that will leave the RKBA in the long run?
The USSC is bad enough without world and regional courts to warp, twist, and discard our Constitution.
If we are to survive as a nation, this has to be stopped.
This is more CFR crap, and they have been pulling strings in D.C. for too d@mned long.
33 posted on
05/22/2006 1:36:57 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: SUSSA
This makes me think of a commercial suggsesting a harsh penalty for some some slicks from NEW YORK CITY who were marketing an inadequate sauce for dipping your corn chips in. It would not be prudent to quote here what those angry cowboys said.
36 posted on
05/22/2006 1:38:26 AM PDT by
LK44-40
To: SUSSA
Memo to Tony Snow
Subject: Compensation
Yo, Tony!
I am sure you have a good package. BUT, I hope you have some kind of deal to be compensated for OT, even though you are salaried.
The OT in this job could be a killer.
40 posted on
05/22/2006 1:42:33 AM PDT by
LK44-40
To: SUSSA
I don't know why we would go to the "Amero". For all intents and purposes, the U.S. dollar is the universal currency for North America, including the Caribbean already.
42 posted on
05/22/2006 1:48:29 AM PDT by
cincinnati65
(Lucky participant in 189 different Nigerian business deals......still waiting on payment.)
To: SUSSA
44 posted on
05/22/2006 2:14:01 AM PDT by
MinorityRepublican
(everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
To: SUSSA
Does the piece also contain news about the Trilateral Commission, the Masons, the Bilderbergers and chemtrails? ...or anything about Area 51?
46 posted on
05/22/2006 2:35:41 AM PDT by
familyop
("he died for rodeo horse on Jul 25, 1987." --skanamaru)
To: SUSSA
Ah--the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations). That's another one.
47 posted on
05/22/2006 2:40:22 AM PDT by
familyop
("he died for rodeo horse on Jul 25, 1987." --skanamaru)
To: SUSSA
The dollar was replaced in 1933, when the provision of the Constitution which says that nothing can be legal tender except gold and silver coin was suspended by executive order.
50 posted on
05/22/2006 3:04:55 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson