Skip to comments.
North American Union to Replace USA? ("is this the plan?" alert!)
HumanEventsOnline.com ^
| 5/19/2006
| Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on 05/19/2006 6:56:03 AM PDT by Dark Skies
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,421-1,427 next last
To: Dark Skies
WTH? I'm not sure if I should search for my tinfoil or duck from the looming black helicopter across from my lawn.
2
posted on
05/19/2006 6:59:07 AM PDT
by
dagar
To: Dark Skies
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada
Uh . . . NAFTA already DOES include Canada.
3
posted on
05/19/2006 6:59:14 AM PDT
by
sittnick
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: Dark Skies

He'd have a helluva lot of work to do with only two years left in his term (barring John Conyers).
4
posted on
05/19/2006 7:00:22 AM PDT
by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: Dark Skies
Exactly. And the fact that Bush has been pursuing this agenda without telling the US people, is worse than despicable.
5
posted on
05/19/2006 7:01:22 AM PDT
by
hershey
To: dagar
same thing is happening here in Europe -->>> European Union
seems, there are more moves on the globe to create similar kinds of regional 'authorities'
soon, all that is needed is a world government on top of all these regional 'Unions', and we just happen to have a UN about... world government might not be far away, think 15-20 years, tops.
how about that for a conspiracy theory?
6
posted on
05/19/2006 7:01:29 AM PDT
by
Palpatine
(The lesson of modern politics is that no class is less fit to govern than that which governs us now.)
To: Dark Skies
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the hell kind of goofball, tin foil nonsense is this??? NAFTA has always included Canada. That's why it's called NAFTA...as in North America.
7
posted on
05/19/2006 7:02:27 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
To: Dark Skies
Interesting. It connects some of the dots for a clearer picture. The question is can we stop it?
8
posted on
05/19/2006 7:03:20 AM PDT
by
maxter
To: Dark Skies
I will not reject this out of hand, but when it comes to multi-government conspiracies, I set the bar high.
Links to a .pdf of an authentic CFR document would have been appreciated. That, and proper spelling of Fox's first name. Sloppy.
9
posted on
05/19/2006 7:03:48 AM PDT
by
L.N. Smithee
(Religious Persecution is ALWAYS wrong. Unless Chinese or Muslims are doing it. </sarcasm>)
To: hershey
Exactly. And the fact that Bush has been pursuing this agenda without telling the US people, is worse than despicable.You cannot believe everything you read. That's Dan Rathers job...
To: Dark Skies
If this were true, George W Bush would be the biggest, worst traitor of them all, and we have a splendid array of them these days. This would outdo Jimmah Cawtuh and the Demons from Dogpatch.
I hope it isn't true. But I don't want to put my head in the sand. So, if it is true, I say, "Come, Lord Jesus!".
11
posted on
05/19/2006 7:04:42 AM PDT
by
RoadTest
(The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? (Jer. 17:9))
To: Dark Skies
Good morning,
i am not sure what to think about this article...It looks like bull sh*t...Too much subjective words and the fact that canada has been long ago included in Nafta...Looks like a blend of the past and the present...Will wait and see.
Best regards.
To: dagar
No joke, no tinfoil. Every word of this is true. Ever wonder why, despite 9/11, Bush did nothing about the southern border? Why he and Fox are so buddy/buddy, why he's ignored the wishes of the American people? (Oh, well, you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs.)
13
posted on
05/19/2006 7:05:18 AM PDT
by
hershey
To: Dark Skies
This is from Jerome R. Corsi the same guy who wrote "Unfit for Command"?
14
posted on
05/19/2006 7:05:34 AM PDT
by
trashcanbred
(Anti-social and anti-socialist)
To: Dark Skies
Evidence that this writer is talking through his hat is in this article itself. The writer claims that Bush intends to "expand NAFTA to include Canada." Helloooo. NAFTA already INCLUDES Canada.
We do not have a problem with "free trade" across the Canadian border because Canada is a developed country with a high standard of living. Canadians are not lined up by the thousands trying to sneak across the border into the US.
The problem is that Mexico, unlike Canada, is a badly-run, third-world country which is deliberately using the US to outsource its poverty problem. That's why we need to slam the Mexican border shut, and need to worry far less about the Canadian border.
Any fool can see the difference between Canada and Mexico, except the writer of this article, apparently.
P.S. My primary is over, but because of certain legal and ethical problems, the incumbent, Charles Taylor may withdraw/be forced out, and I am in the running to be chosen as the replacement nominee for Congress in the 11th District of NC. For more information, see the article below, and my website. I still need your help.
Congressman Billybob
Latest article: "What a Week! What a Week!"
To: Dark Skies
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments.OK. Research time. Who are the members of the U.S working group? Is this group now meeting with it's Mexican counterpart? Has the group issued any public reports or press releases?
16
posted on
05/19/2006 7:08:28 AM PDT
by
RodgerD
(Reject the Amnesty and Immigration Explosion Bill of 2006. No to 100 million new aliens.)
To: Dark Skies; All
No comment ( yet ) but here are the borders links:
For "Thunder on the Border," click the picture:
17
posted on
05/19/2006 7:08:56 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: Dark Skies
This sounds like Bircher B.S. to me. I'm not buying it.
To: Dark Skies
19
posted on
05/19/2006 7:10:16 AM PDT
by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: Dark Skies
I think that a North American Confederation of states is inevitable. When it will happen is a little hard to call, but say within 25 years. Read it and weep.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,421-1,427 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson