North American Union to Replace USA? ("is this the plan?" alert!)

HumanEventsOnline.com ^ | 5/19/2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

[F.J. Mitchell]

That sounds bizarre as hell, but on the other hand the bizarre is becoming more and more to represent the norm in this twisted world of ours.

I'm witholding judgment on this until Rush has a chance to analyze it and give us a report.

[hedgetrimmer]

Building a North American Community

A North American Approach to Security

[atomicpossum]

I suppose it's time for a herd of man-eating robots to descend upon Corsi now, formerly a FR hero of SwiftVets fame.

We thank him for his service to our country (torpedoing the USS John F'ing Kerry), but that doesn't mean we have to follow him anywhere.

[George W. Bush]

We thank him for his service to our country (torpedoing the USS John F'ing Kerry), but that doesn't mean we have to follow him anywhere.

Of course not. But many enlightened thinkers consider a hobby of cannabilism to be unhealthy.

[processing please hold]

Directive 10-289 ends economic and personal freedom in the United States. The government now controls every aspect of an individual’s economic life; it is a dictatorship.

This?

[Malesherbes]

Right. Canada's Mulroney, Mexico's Salinas, and the USA's Bush 41 came up with the original treaty - and Bubba Clinton got the thing through a reluctant Congress. Clinton and Rubin bailed Mexico out of bankruptcy with $ 40 billion, and we were told that NAFTA would put Mexico on the road to prosperity. Instead it just put Mexico on the road north.

Economic marriage between the USA and Canada made economic sense, but hitching the American economy to a corrupt third-world narco-state like Mexico was simply stupid. It also had the effect of destroying Mexican agriculture which could not compete in a free market with efficient American agribusinesses - so the peasants facing starvation head al norte.

[Red Badger]

Yes.......

[alnick]

I've never thought of Phyllis Schlafly as a tin foil hat kook. Do you?

Well, I had to wonder about her when she wrote an article that claimed that since Barbara and Laura Bush are pro-choice, Harriet Miers must be also. After all, they're all women in GWB's life.

That's crazy.

At the very least, the woman is fallible.

[Dark Skies]

That sounds bizarre as hell, but on the other hand the bizarre is becoming more and more to represent the norm in this twisted world of ours.

That's exactly what I thought and the very reason I posted it.

[L,TOWM]

cannabilism to be unhealthy

And frowned on in MOST societies...

[hedgetrimmer]

He'd have a helluva lot of work to do with only two years left in his term (barring John Conyers).

Since this started with Bush senior, and Clinton was also fully on board, it appears that GWB is merely tying up loose ends, for which 2 years should be about enough.

If you go here you'll see numerous references to "working groups". Thats UN speak for government. You'll see that "working groups" comprised of businesses and NGOs are making the decisions about security, trade, standards. Things that our citizens and our elected representatives used to do.

[B4Ranch]

Documenting the Rush To Globalism

[Getready]

Seems like the urge to merge is everlasting...unfortunately
the drive to divide kicks in after everyone realizes they
just can't get along.

[hedgetrimmer]

Don't forget this article: Globalization: The Final Demise of National Security

[ckilmer]

[processing please hold]

Thanks.

Bookmarked.

[ckilmer]

[The_Reader_David]

Oh, not! Not the Coucil on Foreign Relations! Why they're a front for the Freemasons, and the CIA, and the Queen of England. /LaRouch paranoid mode.

[ckilmer]

Trans-Texas Corridor as close as five years
Durant Daily Democrat ^ | May 12, 2006 | Margie Bull
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1631477/posts
Posted on 05/12/2006 7:21:53 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The Trans-Texas Corridor project, proposing four to six toll truck lanes and four to six toll passenger lanes from Laredo to Oklahoma, may be as near as five years.

Greg Massey, a member of the Oklahoma Highway Authority, recently met with the Texas Department of Transportation. “We really didn't get any new information. The project is still proposed to cross over and connect with I-35 to come into Oklahoma. TxDOT did say they are five years out on the project,” Massey said.

Ten different routes are proposed for the corridor. The major variations in the routes follow the three represented on the map in light blue and dark blue.

Oklahomans are pushing for the widening of U.S. 69/75 to bring the traffic through Durant and up to Tulsa. Proposed routes 9, 10, 11 and 12 on the map represent the ones that may come our way. At the Texas border, these routes go south on U.S. 75 to U.S. 380 and connect with the other routes to Laredo.

Route number 5 on the map is TxDOT's recommended preferred alternative as described in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement document. This route has a centerline length of approximately 521 miles and an area of approximately 5,307 square miles. The northern point is at the Texas/Oklahoma border at I-35. The corridor heads southeast across US 75 near McKinney to US 380 where it curves southwest across I-30, I-20, I-45 and continues southwest near Temple, around Austin and ends at the Texas/Mexico border near Laredo.

This preferred alternative is subject to change pending the public hearing process, tentatively scheduled for Summer 2006.

The Texas Department of Transportation will take public comments by writing to: TxDOT Turnpike Authority Division, TTC-35 Comments, P.O. Box 14707, Austin, TX 78761-4704. More information on the proposal and another place for on-line public comments is at keeptexasmoving.com. Maps, population and traffic data are available on the Web site as well as the environmental impact study.

Some groups are for the proposal and others are against it. One group has formed to oppose the proposed route and established their own Web site at corridorwatch.org.