I reject your reality and substitute my own.
Posted on 05/15/2006 9:56:49 AM PDT by polizoo
There's a famous joke that goes like this:
What's the difference between a Rottweiler and a Jewish mother? Eventually, the Rottweiler lets go.
Now, some Jews may find that joke offensive. I don't. But if you're insulted, and you live in Boulder, you're in luck. Soon enough, you may be able to report me to the authorities.
Tuesday, the Boulder City Council will take up the matter of allocating public funding for a "hate hotline," which would give residents an opportunity to report incidents in which Boulderites use tactless language.
"Our concern - and there are many - is that there is no confidentiality, no legal confidentiality," explains Judd Golden, chairman of the Boulder American Civil Liberties Union, which has not yet taken an official position on the hate-line. "So it's potentially chilling if people think they are providing this information in confidence and then that information were provided to the government or the government sought access to it. That would chill free speech."
Golden says the agenda item on the hotline is "extensive" and a "real dilemma" for the ACLU. There are some very "broad standards" laid out in the resolution.
There is, for instance, the policy statement condemning the usual individual or collective acts of racism and bigotry. Great. But it also condemns those who attack "personal beliefs and values."
"Well, for the ACLU, that goes over the line," Golden says. "You can object to free speech just because someone is a Republican or a Democrat."
What would happen to the bumper- sticker industry?
So, it seems that since purifying our thoughts is still beyond technology's reach, Boulder will now attempt to achieve politically correct speech codes in other ways.
The council should realize, however ugly it may be, Americans still have the constitutional right to be racist, homophobic, Jew-hating or even to make bad jokes - as anyone who's heard the one about the redneck who invented the ejection seat on the helicopter can tell you.
The most serious question, however, is will the hate-line folks forward their files to the Boulder police or City Council?
"The devil's in the details," says Golden. "That's the question. There is no present indication that they intend to do anything like that in
the future." Intention? Sorry, that's not good enough. But that's not even the worst part of it. You could - possibly - rationalize this if it weren't utterly useless.
Phillip Martinez beat up a 22-year-old African-American mechanical-engineering student named Andrew Sterling last year in Boulder. He was sentenced to the maximum of 16 years in prison. The jury wisely decided to drop "ethnic intimidation" charges.
Would a hate-line have helped Sterling? Martinez was from Lafayette, not Boulder. He was drunk. He may not have even cared that Sterling was black.
Should everyone keep the hate-line number on their cellphone speed dial from now on? And remember, only call if your attacker uses racist or insensitive language while beating you to a pulp. After all, according to hate-law advocates, it's not genuine hate unless the perpetrator makes fun of your heritage.
Now, Coloradans don't always consider Boulder a reality-based community. But we all betray a serious lack of confidence in our system of freedoms when we take these sorts of measures.
When that incomparable dope the Rev. Fred Phelps and his hate-mongering brood hit town mocking dead soldiers and gays, we handed them their biggest victory: curbing free speech through legislation to shut them up.
"These things have come up with attempts to criminalize hate speech on campus, those kinds of situations," explains Golden. "Certainly, if it just provides an opportunity to call and have a welcome voice and some kinds of soothing response to their concerns, that would be fine. Speech is good."
Speech is good? Well, not always. But it should generally be free.
David Harsanyi's column appears Monday and Thursday. He can be reached at 303-820-1255 or dharsanyi@denverpost.com.
(s)
HOW DARE you use the word "mother" how incensitive to those who are not non-child bearing
(/s)
(s)
HOW DARE you use the word "mother" how incensitive to those who are not non-child bearing
(/s)
Durn-Now I won't be able to call 'em the Peoples Republic of " no more. Won't be able to point out they have more
people on drugs than anywhere in th eformer US of A.(and
drugs prescribed by the godless spawn of the likes of Freud.) Won't be able to cite Scripture (except as the
leftists do -out of context and only as a weapon against the reasonable folk.
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
There's a chill wind blowing...
Well, how many non-children did YOU bear?
;->
No, this tattle-line is what would be chilling free speech, you GD commie!
A: After you die, the tick drops off...
>>>How can you agree with the ACLU on this? They don't even have a stance...>>>
Ok, beg pardon. I agree with the mutterings of the ACLU on this.
Oddly enough, if it were someone calling Jesus a pig or something, they would sue for 'freedom of speech'. But now that it's 'hate speech', that freedom is suspended. ACLU, the hypocritic society.
misc ping!
I just reported you for post niggardly. ;^)
OK. Now what?
Maybe Focus on the Family should move their headquarters to Boulder. Whoya, talk about a clash of civilizations...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.