Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sessions Unveils Massive Numerical Impact Of Senate Immigration Bill
Sessions' website ^ | May 15, 2006 | Unknown

Posted on 05/15/2006 8:37:59 AM PDT by 3AngelaD

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) today unveiled an impact analysis that shows the Senate immigration bill – should it become law – would permit up to 217.1 million new legal immigrants into the United States over the next 20 years, a number equal to 66 percent of the total current population of the United States.

Even if the maximum levels are not reached, the increase to the U.S. population caused by S. 2611 will be at least 78.7 million in 20 years, just over 25 percent of the total current population. This lower estimate assumes that the bill's escalating caps on certain visas will not increase at all over the next 20 years; if the bill's caps are hit each year, the total number will be the higher estimate.

“Until now, most of us have focused on securing the border and deciding how to treat the illegal alien population already in the United States,” Sessions said. “Few, if any, of us have looked ahead to see what the long-term numerical impact of the bill would be. My staff and I have just completed such a study, and the results are shocking.”

Sessions discussed his findings at a news conference today, along with Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, who released his own analysis showing similar numbers.

“As we begin debate today on the floor, my goal is to get these numbers before my colleagues so that they can appreciate just how breath-takingly unsatisfactory this 614-page Senate bill is,” Sessions said. “We know that this country is going to treat the illegal alien population fairly. However, if the Senate wants to be successful in passing immigration reform, it should produce a bill that secures the borders and the workplace and establishes a commonsense, carefully thought out, legally enforceable policy for legal immigration in the future. For our immigration system to work, the Senate bill must guarantee that today’s facade of enforcement and illegal immigration flows won’t exist in the future.”

If the current legal immigration level (950,000 a year for 20 years or 18.9 million over 20 years) is excluded from the total, according to Sessions, the Senate bill could be described as increasing legal immigration by 59 million to 198.2 million over 20 years.

“These are actually very conservative estimates,” Sessions said. “For example, for the low end, we assumed the caps would never escalate, and we only added an average of 1.2 immediate family members coming in with each alien worker. Additionally, our numerical analysis did not add in estimates of future illegal immigration flows, or include any estimates for chain-migration – the parents, brothers and sisters that new citizens can bring in on a permanent basis.”

Chain-migration occurs when an immigrant becomes a citizen. Citizens have a legal right to bring in family members other than spouses and children. They can bring in their parents, their adult siblings and the spouses and children of their adult siblings.

“You can see how the potential exponential growth impact of the Senate legislation will cause consternation on the part of Congress and the American people ,” Sessions said.

The Senate bill would increase permanent future immigration into the United States in several ways.

LOW SKILLED PERMANENT IMMIGRATION:

H-2C Workers: By creating a new (H-2C) visa category for “temporary guest workers” (low skilled workers) with an annual “cap” of 325,000 that increases up to 20 percent each year the cap is met, the bill allows at least 6.5 million, and up to 60.7 million new guest workers to come to the United States over the next 20 years. There is nothing “temporary” about these workers. Employers may file a green card application on their behalf as soon as they arrive in the United States, or the worker may self-petition for a green card after four years of work.

H-4 Family Members of H-2C Workers: By creating a new visa category (H-4) for the immediate family members of the future low-skilled workers (H-2C), and allowing them to also receive green cards, the bill would allow at least 7.8 million, and up to 72.8 million immediate family members of low-skilled workers to come to the United States over the next 20 years.

HIGH SKILLED PERMANENT IMMIGRATION:

H-1B: The bill would essentially open the borders to high-skilled workers, as well as low-skilled workers. By increasing the annual cap of 65,000 to 115,000, automatically increasing the new cap by 20 percent each year the cap is hit, and creating a new exemption to new cap for anyone who has an “advanced degree in science, technology, engineering, or math” from any foreign university, the number of H-1B workers coming into the United States would undoubtedly escalate. The 20-year impact of this escalation could be anywhere from 1 million to 20.1 million. H-1B workers are eligible for green cards and would be allowed to stay and work in the United States for as long as it takes to process the green card application.

STEEP INCREASES TO ANNUAL GREEN CARD LIMITS:

Family Based Green Cards: The bill would increase the annual cap on family based green cards available to non-immediate family members (adult sons and daughters, adults siblings, and the spouses and children of adult siblings) by more than 100 percent, upping the current cap of 226,000 to 480,000 a year. Immediate family members are already able to immigrate without regard to the family based green card caps. The 20-year impact of this change would be an increase of 5.1 million non-immediate family member green cards.

Employment Based Green Cards The bill would increase the annual cap on employment-based green cards by more than 500 percent, upping the current cap of 140,000 to 450,000 until 2016 and to 290,000 thereafter and exempting all immediate family members that currently count against the cap today (spouses, children and parents) from the newly escalated cap. The new exemption would result in an average of 540,000 family members receiving green cards each year of the first 10 years, and an average of 348,000 family members receiving green cards each year of the second 10 years. The 20-year impact of this change would be an increase of 13.5 million employment-based green cards, for a total of 16.3 million employment-based green cards issued over the course of the next 20 years.

-30-


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; demographicgiant; govwatch; population; s2611
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-188 next last
To: Joe Boucher

yah, RATs are and will definitely be better. Uh-huh.


61 posted on 05/15/2006 9:50:57 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (DemocRATs- the CULTURE OF TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Seems like a huge opportunity of the Black community is being ignored. Wonder how long it will take for one of them to see the pontential.


62 posted on 05/15/2006 9:56:34 AM PDT by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

bump, and maybe Sessions for the Republican nomination in 2008?


63 posted on 05/15/2006 9:57:18 AM PDT by ConservativeBamaFan (Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than Dick Cheney's quail gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

If we had just 51 like him we could run this country the way it should be run. God bless you Jeff!


64 posted on 05/15/2006 9:57:32 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (John Spencer: Fighting to save America from Hilllary Clinton..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Never truer words spoken. Bravo.


65 posted on 05/15/2006 9:57:38 AM PDT by RetiredArmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

She compared this to the SS Debacle -- her words.


66 posted on 05/15/2006 9:57:50 AM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeBamaFan

A ground swell movement would be nice.


67 posted on 05/15/2006 9:58:28 AM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: lone star annie; JustPiper; All
"Cornyn and Hutchison from Texas are opposing amnesty."

I don't trust ANY of them. I want them to come out and say very CLEARLY what their intentions are and STICK with them.
I am sick of these politicians saying one thing to appease us and then they turn around and do the opposite to gain VOTES. What they are too stupid to realize is that they are now going to lose more votes from us [the citizens who have worked their entire life to make a good life for their families LEGALLY] As far as I'm concerned they can all take a permanent retirement from politics.

If you watch the news in the larger cities of Texas all you see are lawyer ads with hispanic accents telling people how to sue each other and/or collect social securtity disability. It's so pathetic....... even the grocery stores are now pandering to the mexican community. Many products have larger mexican print than english describing the item. In Walmart there are overhead TV's with ads blaring in spanish!

I really wish my children would decide not to have any more children, I don't see a very good future here any more.

68 posted on 05/15/2006 9:58:45 AM PDT by WestCoastGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
By increasing the annual cap of 65,000 to 115,000, automatically increasing the new cap by 20 percent each year the cap is hit, and creating a new exemption to new cap for anyone who has an “advanced degree in science, technology, engineering, or math” from any foreign university, the number of H-1B workers coming into the United States would undoubtedly escalate.

This will destroy the sciences in this country and wipe out every high tech, high wage field we've got.

Management, doctors (soon to be replaced by foreigners), and lawyers will be the only fields protected.

This is bullsh!t!! WTF did I serve and defend my country for so I could watch a bunch of political b@#ches sell the middle class out !?!?!?!

69 posted on 05/15/2006 9:58:47 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (The social contract is breaking down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

I posted this on the duplicate thread that has been pulled.....If accurate, my poor poor grandchildren will not be living in the United States of America anymore.


70 posted on 05/15/2006 9:58:47 AM PDT by processing please hold (Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Kinda like trading Park Place for Marvin Gardens.


71 posted on 05/15/2006 10:00:00 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doc30

Maybe that works where thay count noses...


72 posted on 05/15/2006 10:04:08 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

The current Congress, Executive Branch and Corporate fat cats are hell-bent on turning the U.S. into a 3rd World country with a massive gulf between the haves and the have nots. They are happy to be on top, with a massive under-class. The middle class is viewed as a threat to the life-style of the elite. This is a very dangerous time for ordinary Americans striving to maintain or grow their quality of life. Like massive tax increases, the threat will not impact those who want to make the decisions. The middle-class must rise up and be heard.


73 posted on 05/15/2006 10:04:35 AM PDT by bluefish (Holding out for worthy tagline...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluefish

BTW - above was my first real post on immigration. Those who were ambivalent and even some of the apologists are going to be waking up real soon. Those who recognize the threat need to keep hammering on this.


74 posted on 05/15/2006 10:06:36 AM PDT by bluefish (Holding out for worthy tagline...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Senator Sessions is on FoxNews noon right now.


75 posted on 05/15/2006 10:11:04 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
This represents either the wave of immigrants crossing the border or the wave of opposition to any half-baked administration/Senate proposal:


76 posted on 05/15/2006 10:11:28 AM PDT by CedarDave (Sleeper trolls are like cicadas - emerge in the heat and contribute nothing but loud annoying noise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: bluefish
Jeff Sessions was just on Fox.

The numbers are almost to staggering to comprehend.

77 posted on 05/15/2006 10:14:19 AM PDT by processing please hold (Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

"Rush is being VERY critical of the possible speech tonight. He is saying the Public isn't going to be fooled..."

And the reply is:

"There's an old saying . . . 'Fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. [Pause.] Fool me -- you can't get fooled again.' "


78 posted on 05/15/2006 10:24:14 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

the pubbies have a problem. their choices like those of the people on flight 73 are between certain death and near certain death.

If they allow the illegals citizenship--the illegal/legals will do what they did after 1986: vote democratic and tip the country to a democratic majority as they have done in california and that because after 1993 in California many mexicans began voting in california to preserve gov bennies--for which the dems excel. There won't be social security benefit for Americans of retirement age from the illegals/legals because they will suck up what ever they put into the economy--as they are now. They won't yield a net gain. ie they won't pay for anyone's social security.

Everyone but everyone who has ever been to any government building that dispenses anything from health care to drivers lisences can't help but notice that the place is swamped with foreigners. Basically the welfare state system set up in the 1960's is being totally gamed by foreigners.

What the president looks like he is about to do will demoralize the republicans bringing on the effects of the 1992 & 1996 elections. There may not even be a third party but when W builds in a reversal of the fortunes of the war of 1848--it creates a kind of passivity in people when they see their leaders commit them to the status of world historical losers.

If Bush decides to put up a wall and expel the illegals then there is a chance to preserve Republican majorities. It would be helpful to promise that the USA will kill the cost of water desalination and transport so as to make it economically possible to turn the deserts 1000 miles from any desert seacoast -- green. (this would increase the habitable size of the USA by a third and double the habitable size of Mexico.)This work is already ongoing and will be accomplished in five years or so--or in about the same time frame that GM promises to have a cost effective fuel cell car. For GM as it is for the GOP its do or die time.

The chief difference between the pubbies current predicament and flight 93 is that they are currently in the cockpit. (if you presume that bush is a republican or at least more of a republican than a bilderburger.)

The point here is that if these guys cannot act like loyal americans at least they can act like republicans. ie people who have a stake in the continuity of the republican party.

Since they are not doing this the republicans in the white house and senate all need to be smacked on both sides of the face and kicked in the but.


79 posted on 05/15/2006 10:30:06 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
"For some reason this article also seems to be kryptonite to a certain group of posters."

Yeah, not a peep.

80 posted on 05/15/2006 10:30:52 AM PDT by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson