Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Not looking good...for Hollywood that is, film otherwise will thrive.

Regards, Ivan

The Sietch Banner

1 posted on 05/05/2006 11:06:26 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; pax_et_bonum; Alkhin; agrace; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 05/05/2006 11:06:51 PM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
WHAT can save Hollywood from another summer of dire sequels and box office catastrophes?

Decent scripts, decent direction, and decent acting. Good luck finding any of that in Mission Impossible:3 and the other explosion laden dreck out there. The best movie of the summer is likely to be one that features no live actors - Pixar's animated feature "Cars".
3 posted on 05/05/2006 11:10:31 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

***and 28 years since the the first Superman film,***???

The first Superman film was made in the 1940's and in the 1950's George Reeves made one about little men from inside the earth.


4 posted on 05/05/2006 11:16:39 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (ISLAM is STILL the religion of the criminally insane!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

ANOTHER REMAKE.

Yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn.

We know the origin of Superman. It isn't that great a story. You want to tell a Superman story, tell a story about this guy. But not THAT story again.


5 posted on 05/05/2006 11:23:36 PM PDT by weegee ("Season's Greetings and Happy Holidays")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
This is the monthly "Can Hollywood be saved?" story. The exagerrations in this piece--driving a car through a theater and not hitting anybody, i.e. nobody going to the movies--is such bunk. They make it sound like the Hollywood economy is in the toilet.

It's not making as many megabucks as before, but it comes and goes, and always has since TV came along.

This movie won't "save" Hollywood anymore than the last movie to "Save Hollywood" did, be it Star Wars, King Kong, The Passion, etc. etc.

I won't see this movie because Superman, simply put, is boring; the movies I saw about him were boring, Superman 1 being one of the great schizo movies ever: epic and beautiful up to the point where Reeves shows up, then dominated by boring TV show characters and a silly villain. Also, it's directed by Bryan Singer, whose X-Men movies are among the most overrated genre exercises in years.

I'm looking forward to Mission Impossible 3, which I've heard from people who've seen it has a good story and characters; The Fountain, because it is genuinely weird; and X-Men 3, because I read the comics as a kid and need SOMEthing big and epic-looking.

The problem with Hollywood is not with the direction or acting, which are both fine generally, or with the craftsmen and women, who are at their most polished. It's with the producers, who are back in the driver's seat with more power than ever, their roles more like those of television producers rather than just financial officers; the writers, who go along with the dictates of these people because they get paid buckets of cash to write crap and that's what they deliver, polished crap with snappy comebacks and little character interest; and yes, the audience, which keeps this crap at the top of the box office.

I get bored with people bitching about Hollywood because if we didn't pay to see this stuff, they wouldn't make it.

7 posted on 05/05/2006 11:26:02 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (If you flame me I'll ignore you. Assume that to mean I think you're an idiot not worth my time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

Poseidon

They're chiseling at the bottom of the barrel.

Superman 43?


8 posted on 05/05/2006 11:28:16 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (Illegal immigration 24/7, the GOP ain't making it 24/7, Oil 24/7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
That, at least, is the hope in Hollywood, which collected only $3.6 billion (£2 billion) from American moviegoers last summer, its worst performance since 2001. Yet with summer releases accounting for up to 40 per cent of annual sales Hollywood is desperate for a caped hero to save the day.

Stop putting out liberal, pudding-eating gay cowboy movies and start with some fresh APOLITICAL or conservative ideas and you will get record crowds.

9 posted on 05/05/2006 11:29:12 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Before I refuse to take your questions, I have an opening statement. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
I'm tired of remakes and wish the high paid writers and studio heads could actually be creative instead of constantly remaking old flicks. That said, I adore Brandon Routh and hope the film succeeds for his sake.
10 posted on 05/05/2006 11:30:31 PM PDT by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

Is Hollywood even worth saving?


13 posted on 05/05/2006 11:41:48 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
Superman Returns is expected to cost north of a quarter of a billion dollars. ...which has taken ten years and multiple writers to make

It's a bird, it's a plane, no it is the biggest box office bomb ever.

16 posted on 05/06/2006 12:05:06 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

Hollywood is asleep at the wheel. They have grown comfortable and take us "peons" for granted and figure we will fork out the bucks for their remakes and sequels. They have grown lazy and are more involved in political matters than film making. What a shame for us and them.


22 posted on 05/06/2006 12:14:23 AM PDT by Vicki (Washington State where anyone can vote .... illegals, non-residents or anyone just passing through)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
He soon finds out that Ms Lane is in a relationship and has a son.

Huh? Is this a parody piece or were they really stupid enough to do that?

I mean, if they wanted to take fundamental liberties with core characters, how about a gay Superman? That's the ticket -- and then throw in a long, complicated-but-touching relationship with Batman and sit back for the Oscars to roll in ....

39 posted on 05/06/2006 3:22:41 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

When you have a faggy looking 5'6" pretty boy like Tom Cruise kicking hell out of peopl in MI3 its no wonder people just dont believe it.


41 posted on 05/06/2006 3:36:56 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
Sequels and franchises will dominate this summer as Tinseltown fights to lure people away from their DVDs and back to the cinema

Hollywood can't help itself. The cinema exists as a platform to slander anything that is even marginally pro-American or for decent family values.

This summer, look for :


42 posted on 05/06/2006 3:42:00 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
“Superman is much larger than any actor. I wanted him to come just with the baggage of the superhero — that's enough history to contend with.” It was reported that James Caviezel was turned down by Mr Singer for the role of Superman because he was too famous after appearing as the Son of God in The Passion of the Christ.

That kind of tells me all I need to know about the director.

I would have gone to see Caviezel in a flat second. He's a wonderful actor and from what I can tell a great guy. At least that's what's come across through his acting and interviews.

Is there also the fact that Caviezel played Jesus and the director is afraid he might combust at the sight of Caviezel on the set? Caviezel knew that his part in the awesome "Passion" would mark him for the rest of his career. This is just one sample.

At any rate, it's now a promise I won't put a "red cent" into this film.

44 posted on 05/06/2006 3:54:26 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
Mission: Impossible III (opened yesterday) Tom Cruise returns to the screen as everyone’s second-favourite secret agent, Ethan Hunt

Ah hem: David Callan, (and his daughter, Nikita Jones), Max Smart, John Steed, Charley balitomre, and numerous others.

45 posted on 05/06/2006 5:53:19 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Natural Selection is the Free Market : Intelligent Design is the Centrally Planned Economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

This year has a few more probable fat blockbusters than last year. Starting this week with MI:3, then X-Men 3 later this month, Superman Returns, Pirates of the Caribean 2, Da Vinci Code, plus a couple others. This will not be like last summer, last March I looked at the summer schedule and spotted at best 3 probable blockbusters, this years I counted 7 or 8 and most of the will probably be bigger than any from last summer.


49 posted on 05/06/2006 7:39:00 AM PDT by discostu (raise your glass of beer on high, and seal your fate forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

How about movies that are not about liberal cause celeb.


55 posted on 05/06/2006 8:51:00 AM PDT by Porterville (I gave at the State Franchise Board; leave me alone you blood sucking liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
There are many other familiar-sounding summer releases, including remakes of sequels to Miami Vice

Miami Vice? Whats next, The Flintstones, Dukes of Hazard, The Brady Bunch??? Oh... never mind.

60 posted on 05/06/2006 9:10:06 AM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

I'll probably skip this one. A gay Superman is too much for me.


69 posted on 05/06/2006 11:00:43 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (I like to make everyone's day a little more surreal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson