Skip to comments.
'Tangible proof' al-Qaida deploying nukes (Bombshell presentation)
WorldNetDaily ^
| 4/25/06
| WorldNetDaily.com
Posted on 04/25/2006 6:50:43 AM PDT by demkicker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-272 next last
I would love to go to this. Hopefully some of our DC FReepers will attend and give us a report.
1
posted on
04/25/2006 6:50:45 AM PDT
by
demkicker
To: demkicker
2
posted on
04/25/2006 6:54:31 AM PDT
by
rellimpank
(Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
To: demkicker
If they had them, they would have used them.
I've read Paul Williams' books and I think he's got too much time on his hands. If any of this information he's revealing is true, he's be in a dark dungeon somewhere, courtesy of Langley.
To: Rutles4Ever
I hope you're right, but I'd still be interested in attending the 'debate'.
4
posted on
04/25/2006 6:58:58 AM PDT
by
demkicker
(democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
To: Rutles4Ever
--Richard Miniter should have some wise words, also--
5
posted on
04/25/2006 7:00:14 AM PDT
by
rellimpank
(Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
To: demkicker
"...the failure of our government to secure the borders and our country's fledgling, incomprehensive effort at homeland security.""
a BIG yup on this one-hope DC presentation on fri. is 'a goodun'!!!
6
posted on
04/25/2006 7:05:54 AM PDT
by
1234
(Border Control or IMPEACHMENT NOW)
To: 1234
7
posted on
04/25/2006 7:08:54 AM PDT
by
demkicker
(democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
To: demkicker
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=64421
Al Qaeda's Suitcase Nukes: A Monumental Debate at the National Press Club, Sponsored by America's Truth Forum
A debate between Richard Miniter, Fox News commentator and author of "Disinformation: 22 Media Myths That Undermine the War on Terror, and Paul L. Williams, Ph.D., award-winning journalist and author of "The Al Qaeda Connection," and "The Dunces of Doomsday," on the subject of al Qaeda's possession of suitcase nuclear weapons will take place on Friday, April 28, at 10 a.m. in the Murrow Room of the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.
The debate will be monitored by Fred Barnes, executive editor of The Weekly Standard and co-host of "The Beltway Boys."
The importance of the debate has been heightened by Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and other al Qaeda operatives in custody who testify to Osama bin Laden's plan for an American Hiroshima, an event that calls for the detonation of seven tactical nuclear weapons in seven major American cities in the near future. These plans have resulted in bin Laden's acquisition of a fatwa from Saudi clerics that permit the terrorist group to kill ten million American civilians.
The clash between these two leading counter-terrorism experts is sponsored by Dr. Hugh Cort, a physician and prominent political activist, and Jeffrey Epstein, president of America's Truth Forum.
Following the debate, there will be a brief press conference in which Dr. Paul Williams will release startling, newly discovered information concerning al Qaeda's nuclear arsenal.
The debate will be held in conjunction with the Truth Forum's Symposium on the Roots of Terrorism at the Doubletree Hotel in Arlington, Va. The two-day event also includes a Friday night VIP reception with former CIA chief James Woolsey at 7 p.m., and a line-up on Saturday of such noted speakers, authors, and terrorism experts as Dr. Harvey Kushner, Robert Spencer, Ken Timmerman, David Horowitz, and many others.
8
posted on
04/25/2006 7:09:27 AM PDT
by
IrishMike
(Dry Powder is a plus)
To: Rutles4Ever
you are wrong,
they had the ability to hijack an airplane years ago, but they waited and planned, I believe documented five years or more to carry it out at the right time, so they could hijack multiple planes and drash into multiple targets simultaneously.
One small tactical nuke in one major city, big problem; but the US would survive.
Three or four tactical nukes set off one day (one week, etc)at a time would effectively end the US as we know it.
Never underestimate the enemy.
Lurking'
To: LurkingSince'98
Concur. This just brightens my day :(
To: LurkingSince'98
The response to this would be multiple air bursts (ie. one thousand times larger than the tac nukes) over Pakistan, North Korea and anyone else even suspected of supplying the materials to Al-Qaeda. It would be the end of the world as we know it. The death toll would be over one hundred million.
To: demkicker
Following the debate, there will be a brief press conference in which Dr. Paul Williams will release startling, newly discovered information concerning al Qaeda's nuclear arsenal. Why following the debate?
12
posted on
04/25/2006 7:37:27 AM PDT
by
M. Dodge Thomas
(More of the same, only with more zeros at the end.)
To: TrebleRebel
SO WHAT? with the US economy devastated and the country in chaos.
In case you missed it, it is the avowed intention of the Islamofascists to see the US economy devastated and the country in chaos.
So what if they then get nuked, don't you see they still win. What you think rationally as them losing, they see as winning. They have NOTHING to lose we have EVERYTHING to lose.
If it ever happens it will be game set and match to them.
Lurking'
To: LurkingSince'98
Three or four tactical nukes set off one day (one week, etc)at a time would effectively end the US as we know it.
General Tommy Franks is on record as stating that in the event of a WMD attack on the United States by terrorists, that the most likely and immediate result would be an imposition of martial law, suspension of the Constitution, and we would have a military government for the duration.
Now there is a silver lining to that, and one needs only to think about Mary McCarthy and her ilk to figure out what that means.
14
posted on
04/25/2006 7:46:57 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: Rutles4Ever
If they had them, they would have used themI would say, "If they had them, they would have used them, IF they had a way to deliver the payload to US soil."
Could be he hasn't yet figured out a way to deploy them, but I heartily agree with you that THEY WILL.............
15
posted on
04/25/2006 7:49:01 AM PDT
by
PISANO
(We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
To: LurkingSince'98
You have studied this situation well and yes I too believe this is their plan, and with the help of our beloved elected having done little to stop the enemy advance into our nation, I too see this as a very real possibility.
I would like to be more optomistic but I believe our beloved elected have underestimated the enemy.
16
posted on
04/25/2006 7:49:42 AM PDT
by
From One - Many
(Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
To: mkjessup
yes it would have a silver lining, but the a$$holes like McCarthy that contributed to us getting there, will also in a way get what they were aiming for.
Anyone, and I mean anyone, freeper or otherwise that does not think that it is a very real and distinct probability that they us nukes on us in the US - is in for a very rude awakening.
Lurking'
To: LurkingSince'98
It is time to reinstate MAD...mutually assured destruction...
18
posted on
04/25/2006 7:53:39 AM PDT
by
thinking
To: All
If Bin Laden pulled off something like multiple nuclear bombs going off it would be the end of the USA as we know it. In that case I would hope that enough of the country remains intact long enough to completely and totally eradicate our enemies off the face of the earth.
19
posted on
04/25/2006 7:54:22 AM PDT
by
Shaun_MD
(In God We Trust. In might we remain free.)
To: thinking
the problem is the arabs want just that.... MAD
is the arab desire.
20
posted on
04/25/2006 7:55:43 AM PDT
by
From One - Many
(Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-272 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson