Posted on 04/24/2006 1:25:05 PM PDT by NYer
Washington DC, Apr. 24, 2006 (CNA) - Questions have arisen about the group of scholars who collaborated with National Geographic in its recent T.V. special about the “discovery” and contents of the alleged Gospel of Judas, which attempts to portray Jesus’ betrayer in a positive light.
Elaine Pagels is a feminist who has written several books against the Catholic Church, such as “The Origin of Satan,” written with the initial help of her colleagues at the Hebrew University of Tel Aviv. With the assistance of the openly pro-abortion MacArthur Foundation, she researched and wrote “Adam, Eve and the Serpent,” in which she accused Christianity of offering a distorted image of women.
Pagels admits she was raised an atheist and that her father taught her that religion was “a children’s fantasy.” Her opinion, which was posted on the National Geographic website, is that texts like the Gospel of Judas are “changing the way in which we understand the beginnings of Christianity.” According to Pagels, the story of the betrayal of Judas gave birth to an anti-Semitic sentiment among Christians.
Pagels support for the exhibit “Art, Religion and Resistance,” which featured Andres Serrano’s blasphemous “Piss Christ,” is well known. In an interview, she defended Serrano in the wake of a scandal in the U.S. Senate over the use of public funds for art exhibits, saying, “Any person who studies what I study is doing that (same kind of work) also.” “Serrano comes from a devout Catholic family,” she claimed.
Christians as anti-Semites
Another of the scholars sought out by National Geographic was Amy Jill Levine, a member of pro-abortion feminist groups as well as the Anti-Defamation League. She believes Christians have been generally anti-Semitic since the time of Jesus, as evidenced in a talk she gave entitled, “Christians say the craziest things (about Jews).”
She participated in an analysis of Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ”—before the movie was actually filmed—in which she claimed the movie was anti-Semitic. Levine, who calls herself a “Jewish feminist Yankee,” said at that time that “Hollywood can easily change the truth,” in reference to Gibson’s film.
Levine claimed that those who composed and copied the Gospel of Judas “challenged the traditional characterization of Judas as a villain, espoused a stricter sexual ethic than the canonical gospels, and offered an alternative theology to both the proto-Orthodox church and the Synagogue.
Judas, the closest friend of Jesus
Another expert for the project was Bart Ehrman, head of the Religious Studies Department at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In works such as “Does Historical Evidence for the Resurrection Exist?” and “Lost Christianities,” which present information from the Gnostic sects of the first centuries, Ehrman casts doubt on the very existence of Jesus.
He has also written “Truths and Myths of the Da Vinci Code” in which he attributes some truthfulness to the Dan Brown novel. He exempts Jews from guilt for the crucifixion of Jesus and blames the Romans alone because he says Jesus represented a threat for the empire.
Ehrman told National Geographic that the text portrays Judas as “not the evil, corrupt, devil-inspired follower of Jesus who betrayed his master; he is instead Jesus' closest intimate and friend, the one who understood Jesus better than anyone else, who turned Jesus over to the authorities because Jesus wanted him to do so.”
Marvin Meyer is another scholar who collaborated with National Geographic. Several of his works, including “The Gnostic Discoveries”, “The Gnostic Gospels of Jesus”, “The Unknown Sayings of Jesus”, “The Gospels of Mary and Secret Gospels: Essays on Thomas” and “The Secret Gospel of Mark”, were used by Dan Brown as an influence for “The Da Vinci Code”.
Meyer is Griset Professor of Biblical and Christian Studies at Chapman University in Orange, California, and director of the Chapman University Albert Schweitzer Institute.
Stephen Emmel, another expert, contradicted himself regarding the age of the Gospel of Judas during a National Geographic press conference. Initially he said the text dated to 400 A.D., but later he said it was written in 300 A.D. The program however, claims the text was penned in 200 A.D.
Emmel is a professor of Coptology at the Institute of Egyptology and Coptology at the University of Münster in Germany. “We can all be grateful to the National Geographic Society for its effort to rescue this unique artifact for the good of science and for posterity," he said.
Craig Evans and Francois Gaudard are two other experts who collaborated with National Geographic. Evans, who has taught a various universities, denies that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist, does not believe in the resurrection of Jesus or in his miracles and has written several works on the Gnostic sects in which he refers to the supposed anti-Semitism of Christians.
Gaudard, an Egyptologist and research associate at the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, told National Geographic, “This text not only seriously challenges one of the most firmly rooted beliefs in Christian tradition, but also reduces one of the favorite themes of anti-Semitism to nothing."
More MSM whining "We're talking about Christianity, why aren't you Christians watching us?"
Sooo, she admits that anti-Semitism is a bad thing. Alright, so far so good. You'd assume that the next step is denouncing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, right? Wrong. Christians are the enemy of Jews! Muslims are peaceful and would never seek to wipe Israel off the map. Nor do they wish to convert or kill every Jew on the face of the planet.
I have listened to Ehrman he is a Christianity debunker.
This furor is about nada, zilch. This book of Judas has been known for centuries. For those interested here's a link to Early Christian Writings, some of value,some not.
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/
Ad hominem arguments are fellatious. To argue with their output, one needs to pick apart their logic, lingustics and textology, not their biographies. What was the name of that islamic professor whose best argument was "you are a heretic"?
I doubt you are going to find many "pro-canonical" Biblical scholars who are going to be interested in participating with a TV special that hypes a work that contradicts the traditional Bible.
Hey, hey, hey.... my favorite guy in the NT (next to Jesus) is finally getting a fair shake! Quit nit-picking!
Ill need to do Penance for it, but I sat down to watch it the other night. I shut it off halfway through. Not because I questioned the science, but because of the arrogance of the Coptic Scholars. I was really struck by their attitudes..
There's no way to know
if the version getting press
is real or contrived.
So many 'experts'
involved with the project have
such passionate views
against the 'classic'
Christian view of Jesus Christ,
any document
they give support to
should be called questionable.
They may overlook
blatant forgeries,
or their 'zeal' might persuade them
to forge things themselves,
using their knowledge
to create very good fakes.
(And this attention
to the strong bias
among so-called experts might
call into question
other high profile
revisionist Christian finds . . .
Should we really trust
all the 'Dead Sea' scrolls?
Even today the story
of their 'discovery'
is just that, story.
Two generations ago,
we hadn't wised up . . .)
You might want to reconsider the spelling of that...
Precisely.
"The Davinci Code" and "The Gospel of Judas" are mainstream attempts to undermine the importance of the Gospel. They target Jesus Christ's divinity by insisting that He was just a regular man. A regular man who married a woman and also knowingly asked people to sin.
By defiling Christ's wonderful message (and subsequently deceiving mankind), they serve the interests of Satan.
Ignore these dishonest films, and keep your faith strong in the Lord. There is no other path to grace, peace and truth without belief in the Gospel.
No, Judas does not count as a Gospel!!!
I'm not sure what, if anything, ad hominem argument has to do with oral sodomy.
To argue with their output, one needs to pick apart their logic, lingustics and textology, not their biographies.
I'm not sure what "textology" is, either.
The author of the article is not mentioning their biases in order to refute their arguments - he is mentioning their biases to demonstrate that the media is obssessively one-sided in their coverage.
His point is that we have seven so-called experts who all take a view antithetical to that of orthodox Christianity while not one scholar is there to take the other side of the argument.
What was the name of that islamic professor whose best argument was "you are a heretic"?
You realize, of course, that this itself is a form of the ad hominem argument?
This wouldnt be the first time NG put their agenda ahead of accuracy.
You would be able to find plenty.
The reason why they were not included was that they are not invited - because any Christian scholar would be able to blow holes in these heterodox arguments wide enough to drive a Mack truck through.
I'm not a scholar, although I have a far superior theological background to Pagels' and also am more knowledgeable about the source languages than she is. I would have loved to have been able to get a few zingers in, and I doubt that I am alone.
They couldn't wait to bring this and the Mary Magdelene was Jesus' wife and they had children stuff out at Eastertime. Big slap in the face. It's all about destroying Christianity, the Roman Catholic Church/religion. Secular humanism triumphant. PC multiculturalism/moral relativism, communism the list is endless and disgusting.
Like what?... I have been a Catholic Christian all my life and I don't recall anyone who is devout in their faith say anything that disparages the Jewish people.
But I guess Amy can call Christians anything she'd like. Sounds like a double standard to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.