This furor is about nada, zilch. This book of Judas has been known for centuries. For those interested here's a link to Early Christian Writings, some of value,some not.
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/
There's no way to know
if the version getting press
is real or contrived.
So many 'experts'
involved with the project have
such passionate views
against the 'classic'
Christian view of Jesus Christ,
any document
they give support to
should be called questionable.
They may overlook
blatant forgeries,
or their 'zeal' might persuade them
to forge things themselves,
using their knowledge
to create very good fakes.
(And this attention
to the strong bias
among so-called experts might
call into question
other high profile
revisionist Christian finds . . .
Should we really trust
all the 'Dead Sea' scrolls?
Even today the story
of their 'discovery'
is just that, story.
Two generations ago,
we hadn't wised up . . .)