Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teacher’s assistant facing sex charge surrenders(student is 18 years old)
http://www.citizen-times.com | 4 14 06 | Jordan Schrader,

Posted on 04/15/2006 7:44:28 AM PDT by freepatriot32

article cant be posted link only

http://www.citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060414/NEWS01/60413075/1010


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: 18; assistant; charge; donutwatch; facing; govwatch; hitit; is; libertarians; naughtyteacherlist; northcarolina; old; sex; student; surrenders; teachers; weaverville; years
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: cripplecreek
That's my point. She's not his teacher...

The law is the law. It's the same in Texas. Doesn't matter if the student is in the teacher's class or not. No teacher should be messing around with any student even if they are a Senior and of legal age.

41 posted on 04/15/2006 9:40:47 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
It's clearly an unconstitutional law. You just can't tell adults who they can and cannot have consensual sex with.
42 posted on 04/15/2006 9:43:12 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
She is the third school employee this year to face charges of having sex with a Buncombe County high school senior.

Didn't she watch the local news and learn that other teachers had gotten caught for exactly the same thing that she was about to do?

43 posted on 04/15/2006 9:48:31 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny. "--Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Wow, I must have the abridged version of the constitution...


44 posted on 04/15/2006 9:49:16 AM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Orlando

"Can't these women teachers find men their own age these days ? This is a daily/weekly thing now"

Only 4 years? Try thinking for yourself instead of repeating that "clickish" line. I am not advocating the sex, but the age is not the issue.


45 posted on 04/15/2006 10:05:14 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

And she was engaged to another teacher at the same high school. Imagine what hell he's going through. Everyone for miles around will know his soon-to-be-wife chose an 18 year old kid and ruining her fledgling career over being faithful to him. Poor bastard.


46 posted on 04/15/2006 10:33:37 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: jasoncann

Make sure you add the one at the link in post #38.


48 posted on 04/15/2006 11:14:04 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha; connectthedots; cripplecreek
Read the law.

North Carolina law states: “If a defendant, who is a teacher, school administrator, student teacher, school safety officer, or coach, at any age … engages in intercourse or a sexual act with a victim who is a student, at any time during or after the time the defendant and victim were present together in the same school, but before the victim ceases to be a student, the defendant is guilty of a Class G felony, except when the defendant is lawfully married to the student.”

I agree, there may be a good chance she didn't know the exact age of the guy(19 or 18) and was probably clueless to the law(that's not an excuse), but I almost guarantee she knew the guy through school. She's pretty cute and I'm sure it was probably some popular kid in the school.

If you read what the law is, it's obvious the lawmakers didn't want any faculty member involved sexually with any of their school's schools. That isn't too draconian considering the fluid nature which faculty is given responsibility over students. Plus every faculty member has some authority over the students.

Now here s more pictures.
Image hosting by Photobucket
Image hosting by Photobucket
Image hosting by Photobucket
Image hosting by Photobucket
Image hosting by Photobucket

49 posted on 04/15/2006 11:17:48 AM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
North Carolina law states: “If a defendant, who is a teacher, school administrator, student teacher, school safety officer, or coach, at any age … engages in intercourse or a sexual act with a victim who is a student, at any time during or after the time the defendant and victim were present together in the same school, but before the victim ceases to be a student, the defendant is guilty of a Class G felony, except when the defendant is lawfully married to the student.”

If that is a correct reading of the law, what crime did she commit? He was of legal age and they were not at the same school.

50 posted on 04/15/2006 11:26:17 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Grow up.

Just for you I'll get right on that. It will be just one small step toward getting the whole world to grow up and be refined so as to meet your standards.

51 posted on 04/15/2006 11:26:30 AM PDT by Minn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
The law is the law. It's the same in Texas. Doesn't matter if the student is in the teacher's class or not. No teacher should be messing around with any student even if they are a Senior and of legal age.

Oh, please. It's called legislative intent. Their idea that this is an ethical issue, where a student in the class could be perceived or obtain favorable treatment.

This woman needs a good lawyer to have this case dismissed. She's not a teacher, she's a teacher assistant. Big Difference. That ALONE should avoid prosecution..

52 posted on 04/15/2006 11:26:57 AM PDT by Experiment 6-2-6 (Admn Mods: tiny, malicious things that glare and gibber from dark corners.They have pins and dolls..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Here's another one.


53 posted on 04/15/2006 11:28:45 AM PDT by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Experiment 6-2-6

Check out post #50.

Appears the law doesn't cover her position; and even if it did, she was not at the same school; and he was 18.


54 posted on 04/15/2006 11:30:04 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

This is the guy she was engaged to.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=32118450

These are some pretty funny comments.

Ryan's comment to Heather:
2/28/2006 5:40 PM

Just wanted to tell you I loved you babe. Can you believe we're buying a house, such a blessing from God!

Ryan to Heather on valentines day:
2/14/2006 12:42 PM

Thank you baybee for your sweet comment. I can't imagine spending this Valentine's Day with anyone else!!! I can't believe this is our FIFTH Valentine's Day together!!! I can't wait to go look at that house today with you! Just think, this may really be our house.
I love you soooooooo much!!!
Ryan


Then from a girl named amber to ryan

3/29/2006 10:15 AM

Hey...I heard a rumor that there is a wedding in your future...who's the lucky lady? Keep me posted... have a great day! Love you!

Then ryan responds to amber:
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=38882034
3/30/2006 5:57 PM

Hey girl. Why yes there is a future wedding; remember, you promised to marry me! I'm just kidding, I guess you're already taken. Ya, we're planning on getting married next summer, 777. God's lucky number July 7 2007. How have you been? Great talking to you!!


55 posted on 04/15/2006 11:30:11 AM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Springman
After carefully reviewing the photos I've come to the conclusion that I'd do her if need be.

Sacrifices have to be made sometimes....

56 posted on 04/15/2006 11:31:40 AM PDT by null and void (Pay no attention to the imam behind the curtain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Experiment 6-2-6

GG, read the law already folks.

"teacher, school administrator, student teacher, school safety officer, or coach, at any age"

There. It says student teacher(which is essentially the same).


57 posted on 04/15/2006 11:35:45 AM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

What's the idea? If he wasn't under her direct supervision, And he was 18, Where's the crime?


58 posted on 04/15/2006 11:37:33 AM PDT by desherwood7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

Yes the law covers her position and how do you know he didn't go to the same school she taught?


59 posted on 04/15/2006 11:37:59 AM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: desherwood7

What is direct supervision in a high school? It changes mutltiple times per day let alone between semesters. And ever member of the faculty has some authority over the students.


60 posted on 04/15/2006 11:39:10 AM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson