Yes the law covers her position and how do you know he didn't go to the same school she taught?
Um, I would argue that it does not. The law covers thouse TEACHING. She is only a teacher's assistant. Without the authority of the other parties. It might be semantics, but I would push it big time.
As for the attendence, the wording of the law has serious flaws in it's present form.
I stand corrected. The article does say she was a teaching assistant at the HS for special needs kids. I was thrown off by her degree in elementary education. The comment that the authorities aren't even sure they met at school also threw me off. I should have read closer.
Even with that, her position is not covered by the law. I'm not saying it shouldn't be; just that it isn't.